Article

Development and Validation of QuEChERS Method for Estimation of Chlorantraniliprole Residue in Vegetables.

Authors are with Pesticide Residue Analysis Laboratory, Dept. of Entomology, Punjab Agricultural Univ., Ludhiana-141004, Punjab, India. Direct inquires to author Mandal (E-mail: ).
Journal of Food Science (Impact Factor: 1.78). 07/2012; DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02801.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT   An easy, simple and efficient analytical method was standardized and validated for the estimation of residues of chlorantraniliprole in different vegetables comprising brinjal, cabbage, capsicum, cauliflower, okra, and tomato. QuEChERS method was used for the extraction and cleanup of chlorantraniliprole residues on these vegetables. Final clear extracts of ethyl acetate were concentrated under vacuum and reconstituted into high performance liquid chromatograph (HPLC) grade acetonitrile, and residues were estimated using HPLC equipped with PDA detector system, C(18) column and confirmed by liquid chromatograph mass spectrometer (LC-MS/MS), and high performance thin layer chromatograph (HPTLC). HPLC grade acetonitrile:water (80:20, v/v) was used as mobile phase @ 0.4 mL/min. Chlorantraniliprole presented distinct peak at retention time of 9.82 min. Consistent recoveries ranging from 85% to 96% for chlorantraniliprole were observed when samples were spiked at 0.10, 0.25, 0.50, and 1.00 mg/kg levels. The limit of quantification of this method was worked out to be 0.10 mg/kg. Practical Application:  The QuEChERS sample preparation is suitable for determination of chlorantraniliprole in brinjal, cabbage, capsicum, cauliflower, okra and tomato and thus demonstrating the great versatility of this method. The proposed analytical method using liquid chromatography techniques for the determination of chlorantraniliprole in different vegetable matrices has been demonstrated to be sensitive, fast, precise, accurate, and robust and can be used to monitor chlorantraniliprole residues in different vegetables.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
306 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The persistence pattern of chlorantraniliprole on berseem leaves and its risk assessment for the safety of cattle were studied. QuEChERS method was used for the extraction and cleanup of samples and the residues of chlorantraniliprole were estimated using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and confirmed by Liquid Chromatograph–Mass Spectrometer (LCMS–MS). The dissipation studies on berseem were carried out by application of chlorantraniliprole at five different dosages i.e. 11.6, 17.1, 23.1, 34.7 and 46.2 g a.i. ha−1. Average initial deposits of chlorantraniliprole were found to be 0.47, 0.61, 0.78, 1.15 and 1.31 mg kg−1, respectively. The residues reached below determination limit (BDL) of 0.01 mg kg−1 in 5, 7, 7, 10 and 10 days for 11.6, 17.1, 23.1, 34.7 and 46.2 g a.i. ha−1 dosages, respectively. Half-life (t1/2) of chlorantraniliprole on berseem was observed to be 0.93, 1.14, 1.06, 1.00 and 1.33 days, respectively, at 11.6, 17.1, 23.1, 34.7 and 46.2 g a.i. ha−1. It was found that the theoretical maximum residue contributions (TMRC) values reached below maximum permissible intake (MPI) on 0 day in berseem samples treated with chlorantraniliprole. These studies, therefore suggest that the use of chlorantraniliprole formulation at different dosages does not seem to pose any hazards to the consumers and a waiting period of one day is suggested to reduce the risk before consumption of berseem leaves. These data could provide guidance for the proper and safe use of this pesticide on berseem in India.
    Chemosphere 01/2014; 112:100–104. · 3.14 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Pollinators such as the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, fulfil a crucial role in agriculture. In this context, tests were conducted with the insecticide chlorantraniliprole (Coragen®) as a model compound active on the ryanodine receptor of insects. RESULTS: Chronic oral exposure via pollen induced lethargic behaviour in B. terrestris workers and their offspring (drones). Indeed, in nests exposed to 0.4 mg L(-1) , representing 1/100 of the concentration recommended for use in the field, workers and drones did not take their defensive position upon stimulation and they were less active than non-exposed insects. The different risk assessment tests used here demonstrated that contact and pollen exposure had no effect on bumblebee worker survival, whereas oral exposure via sugar water caused both acute (72 h LC50 = 13 mg L(-1) ) and chronic (7 week LC50 = 7 mg L(-1) ) toxicity. Severe sublethal effects on reproduction were recorded in nests orally exposed to pollen treated with chlorantraniliprole. CONCLUSION: The present study identified an important physiological endpoint of sublethal effects on reproduction, as this is associated with lethargic behaviour after oral intake. As such, this is a factor that should now be incorporated into future risk assessments. Secondly, it confirmed that the assessment of sublethal effects on behaviour is needed for adequate risk assessment of 'potentially deleterious' compounds with a neurogenic target, as is also pointed out in the recent European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) guidelines. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry.
    Pest Management Science 02/2013; · 2.74 Impact Factor