Article

Does a digital regional nerve block improve the accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring?

Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, 521 Parnassus Avenue, C317, San Francisco, CA, 94143-0648, USA, .
Journal of Anesthesia (Impact Factor: 1.12). 08/2012; DOI: 10.1007/s00540-012-1452-0
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Blood hemoglobin (Hb) can be continuously monitored utilizing noninvasive spectrophotometric finger sensors (Masimo SpHb). SpHb is not a consistently accurate guide to transfusion decisions when compared with laboratory Co-Oximetry (tHb). We evaluated whether a finger digital nerve block (DNB) would increase perfusion and, thereby, improve the accuracy of SpHb. METHODS: Twenty adult patients undergoing spinal surgery received a DNB with lidocaine to the finger used for the monitoring of SpHb. SpHb-tHb differences were determined immediately following the DNB and approximately every hour thereafter. These differences were compared with those in our previously reported patients (N = 20) with no DNB. The SpHb-tHb difference was defined as "very accurate" if <0.5 g/dL and "inaccurate" if >2.0 g/dL. Perfusion index (PI) values at the time of each SpHb-tHb measurement were compared. RESULTS: There were 57 and 78 data points in this and our previous study, respectively. The presence of a DNB resulted in 37 % of measurements having SpHb values in the "very accurate group" versus 12 % in patients without a DNB. When the PI value was >2.0, only 1 of 57 DNB values was in the "inaccurate" group. The PI values were both higher and less variable in the patients who received a DNB. CONCLUSIONS: A DNB significantly increased the number of "very accurate" SpHb values and decreased the number of "inaccurate" values. We conclude that a DNB may facilitate the use of SpHb as a guide to transfusion decisions, particularly when the PI is >2.0.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
148 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: /st>Various methods of haemoglobin (Hb) measurement are available to guide transfusion including several methods that allow for measurement at the bedside. This study directly compared their absolute and trend accuracy compared with values from the central lab (reference method). /st>Adult patients undergoing surgery with expected blood loss wore a rainbow ReSposable sensor connected to a Radical-7 Pulse CO-Oximeter (SpHb). Arterial samples were analysed with a haematology analyser (HbLab), a satellite CO-Oximeter (HbSat), and a point-of-care haemoglobinometer (HemoCue; HcueArt). Concomitantly, ear capillary blood was tested using the same haemoglobinometer (HcueCap). Absolute accuracy and the clinical significance of error were assessed with Bland-Altman plots and three-zone error grids. Trend analysis was performed using a modified polar plot, testing both directionality and magnitude of Hb changes compared with the reference. /st>Two hundred and nineteen measurements from 53 patients with HbLab ranging between 6.8 and 16.3 g dl(-1) (4.2 and 10.1 mmol litre(-1)) were recorded. Compared with the reference method, bias (precision) was 0.2 (0.2) g dl(-1) [0.1 (0.1) mmol litre(-1)] for HcueArt, 0.8 (0.3) g dl(-1) [0.5 (0.2) mmol litre(-1)] for HbSat, 0.5 (0.5) g dl(-1) [0.3 (0.3) mmol litre(-1)] for HcueCap and 1.0 (1.2) g dl(-1) [0.6 (0.7) mmol litre(-1)] for SpHb. None of the devices tested would have led to unnecessary or delayed transfusion according to 2006 ASA transfusion criteria. Trend accuracy was better for HcueArt and HbSat than for HcueCap and SpHb. /st>Bedside Hb measurement methods differ in their agreement to a laboratory haematology analyser but none would have led to transfusion errors.Trial Registry NumberRCB 2009-AO1144-53.
    BJA British Journal of Anaesthesia 07/2013; · 4.24 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the accuracy and trending ability of a four-wavelength pulse-total hemoglobinometer that continuously and noninvasively measures hemoglobin in surgical patients. With IRB approval and informed consent, spectrophotometric hemoglobin (SpHb) was measured with a pulse-total hemoglobinometer manufactured by Nihon Kohden Corp (Tokyo, Japan) and compared to the CO-oximeter equipped with blood gas analyzer. Two hundred twenty-five samples from 56 subjects underwent analysis. Bland-Altman analysis revealed that the bias ± precision of the current technology was 0.0 ± 1.4 g/dl and -0.2 ± 1.3 g/dl for total samples and samples with 8 < Hb < 11 g/dl, respectively. The percentages of samples with intermediate risk of therapeutic error in error grid analysis and the concordance rate of 4-quadrant trending assay was 17 % and 77 %, respectively. The Cohen kappa statistic for Hb < 10 g/dl was 0.38, suggesting that the agreement between SpHb and CO-oximeter-derived Hb was fair. Collectively, wide limits of agreement, especially at the critical level of hemoglobin, and less than moderate agreement against CO-oximeter-derived hemoglobin preclude the use of the pulse-total hemoglobinometer as a decision-making tool for transfusion.
    Journal of Anesthesia 10/2013; · 1.12 Impact Factor