A quantitative ultrastructural study of circulating (monocytic) cells interacting with endothelial cells in high oxygen-injured and spontaneously re-forming (FVB) mouse lung capillaries

Harvard Medical School, Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Ultrastructural Pathology (Impact Factor: 1.13). 08/2012; 36(4):260-79. DOI: 10.3109/01913123.2012.662820
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The present study demonstrates the fine structure of blood-borne (monocytic) circulating cells (CCs), and their interaction with endothelial cells, in a mouse model of lung capillary injury and repair. Quantitative analysis highlights the diversity of CC profiles entering the lung, where they form contact and adhesion/fusion sites to endothelial plasmalemmal membranes, and to complexes of endothelial/basement membrane remnants, as capillary networks reorganize over time. Temporal patterns of CC influx and efflux in the lung, changing CC phenotypes, and the range of CC interactions with endothelium, underscore the potential for a complex angiogenic/immunogenic response, as capillary networks stabilize and undergo expansion and growth.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract The present study provides new insight into structural processes remodeling pulmonary capillaries in adult lung. The data highlight mechanisms underlying the expansion and increased density of capillary segments on return to air breathing (FiO2 0.21) after injury in high oxygen (FiO2 0.75). As segments expand and increase in number, endothelial cells extend their processes to bridge the lumen and support the walls of developing interluminal structures (ILSs); endothelial-epithelial surfaces infold as a single unit (sheet) into the lumen, increasing the length of each surface and subdividing segments by loop formation and by the formation of ILSs; segments further increase in number as lumen subdivision proceeds by intussusceptive microvascular growth (IMG).
    Ultrastructural Pathology 10/2013; 38(1). DOI:10.3109/01913123.2013.833561 · 1.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract The present study demonstrates the fine structure of pulmonary capillaries first injured and then undergoing growth in response to a change in the ambient alveolar oxygen tension. Breathing a high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2 0.75) triggers restriction by endothelial cell injury and effacement leading to segment narrowing and shortening and segment loss as demonstrated by a fall in density. Subsequently, breathing a relatively low fraction (FiO2 0.21) triggers capillary assembly (angiogenesis), which reverses the changes. The data underscore the structural reprogramming (reduction and restoration) of pulmonary capillaries in response to significant shifts in oxygen tension.
    Ultrastructural Pathology 10/2013; 37(6). DOI:10.3109/01913123.2013.831156 · 1.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract The present study provides further insight into the structural processes that remodel pulmonary capillaries in the injured adult lung. Early in hyperoxia acute lung injury (HALI), many sub-dividing segments are present throughout the capillary network before segment occlusion and loss predominate and capillary density decreases later in the period. A second segment sub-division triggered in regenerating capillaries after air breathing (post-HALI) demonstrates a similar mechanism of organization at a time of contrasting change in the capillary density. As we have previously reported, the process of segment sub-division includes in-folding of the endothelial-epithelial surface (alveolar-capillary membrane) to form inter-luminal structures (ILSs) and loops, with loop separation increasing segment number. Unexpectedly, the findings support remodeling of the capillary density by wall in-folding in acute lung injury, demonstrating a similar mechanism in capillary regression as well as in regeneration in the adult lung.
    Ultrastructural Pathology 02/2014; 38(3). DOI:10.3109/01913123.2014.888113 · 1.13 Impact Factor
Show more