[State of emergency plans for massive influx of injured (PEMAF) in Italian hospitals. Pilot study]

Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile Edile Ambientale, Sapienza Università di Roma.
Annali di igiene: medicina preventiva e di comunità 07/2012; 24(3):229-39.
Source: PubMed


Aim of this study is to assess the level of implementation of plans for the massive influx of injured (PEMAF) in Italian hospitals. An anonymous questionnaire was administered to a sample of 100 hospitals selected through the network of the Italian Society of Emergency Medicine (SIMEU). Each answer of the questionnaire was assigned a score, then reported on a scale of compliance (maximum 65 points, threshold 35 points). The average scores were analyzed by hospital's venue, level of activity and previous experience of managing a real emergency. Student's t-test was used to compare means. Thirty-two hospitals sent the questionnaire, representing 33% of those selected. Five were excluded for incomplete data. The data analyzed refers to 27 hospitals of various levels of complexity, from all around the country: 55.6% from the Northern Section, 22.2% from the Centre and 22.2% from the Southern section and the Islands; and only 55.6% are above the minimum threshold of compliance. The weakest PEMAF's area is the one related to the specific training of health workers, therefore the percentage of hospitals complying the requirements in this field is down to 37%. Ten hospitals (37%) had managed a real maxi-emergence in the past: belonging to such group of hospitals is associated with an average level of compliance significantly higher than the others (p < 0.005). Due to a limited percentage of responders, the study involved so far a too small amount of hospitals; happily, they were evenly distributed in the different sections of the Country; therefore it will be appropriate to obtain a larger compliance before reaching clear-cut conclusions, but it already appears that the most critical point is the lack of specific education to maxi-emergencies in the hospital personnel.

Download full-text


Available from: Daniela D'Alessandro, Oct 09, 2015
177 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: During disasters, the public expects that emergency care will be available at a moment's notice. As such, an emergency medical services (EMS) workforce that is trained and prepared for disasters is imperative. The primary objectives of this study were to quantify the amount of individual-level training EMS professionals receive in terrorism and disaster-preparedness, as well as to assess EMS professionals' participation in multiagency disaster drills across the United States. Characteristics of those most likely to have received individual-level training or participated in multiagency disaster drills were explored. The secondary objectives were to assess EMS professional's perception of preparedness and to determine whether the amount of training individuals received was correlated with their perceptions of preparedness. A structured survey was administered to nationally certified EMT-Basics and paramedics as part of their 2008 recertification paperwork. Outcome variables included individual-level preparedness training, participation in multiagency disaster drills, and perception of preparedness. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression modeling were used to quantify the amount of training received. Spearman rank correlation coefficients were used to analyze whether training was correlated with an individual's perception of preparedness. There were 46,127 EMS professionals who had the opportunity to complete the recertification questionnaire; 30,570 (66.3%) responded. A complete case analysis was performed on 21,438 respondents. Overall, 19,551 respondents (91.2%) reported receiving at least 1 hour of individual-level preparedness training, and 12,828 respondents (59.8%) reported participating in multiagency disaster drills, in the prior 24 months. Spearman rank correlation coefficients revealed that hours of individual-level preparedness training were significantly correlated with the perception of preparedness. While areas where EMS should focus attention for improvement were identified, a majority of nationally certified EMT-Basics and paramedics reported participating in both individual and multiagency disaster-preparedness training. A large majority of respondents reported feeling adequately prepared to respond to man-made and natural disasters and the perception of preparedness correlated with hours of training.
    Academic Emergency Medicine 04/2011; 18(4):403-12. DOI:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01030.x · 2.01 Impact Factor
  • Disaster Management & Response 04/2007; 5(2):27. DOI:10.1016/j.dmr.2007.04.001
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There are no standardized measures of hospital disaster preparedness or hospital "surge capacity." To characterize disaster preparedness among a cohort of hospitals in Los Angeles County, focusing on practice variation, plan characteristics, and surge capacity. This was a descriptive, cross-sectional survey study, followed by on-site verification. Forty-five 9-1-1 receiving hospitals in Los Angeles County, CA, participated. Evaluations of hospital disaster plan structure, vendor agreements, modes of communication, medical and surgical supplies, involvement of law enforcement, mutual aid agreements with other facilities, drills and training, surge capacity (assessed by monthly emergency department diversion status, available beds, ventilators, and isolation rooms), decontamination capability, and pharmaceutical stockpiles were assessed by survey. Forty-three of 45 hospital plans (96%) were based on the Hospital Emergency Incident Command System, and the majority had protocols for hospital lockdown (100%), canceling elective surgeries (93%), early discharge (98%), day care for children of staff (88%), designating victim overflow areas (96%), and predisaster "preferred" vendor agreements (96%). All had emergency medical services-compatible radios and more than three days' worth of supplies. Fewer hospitals involved law enforcement (56%) or had mutual aid agreements with other hospitals (20%) or long-term care facilities (7%). Although the vast majority (96%) conducted multiagency drills, only 16% actually involved other agencies in their disaster training. Only 13 of 45 hospitals (29%) had a surge capacity of greater than 20 beds. Less than half (42%) had ten or more isolation rooms, and 27 hospitals (60%) were on diversion greater than 20% of the time. Thirteen hospitals (29%) had immediate access to six or more ventilators. Less than half had warm-water decontamination (42%), while approximately one half (51%) had a chemical antidote stockpile and 42% had an antibiotic stockpile. Among hospitals in Los Angeles County, disaster preparedness and surge capacity appear to be limited by a failure to fully integrate interagency training and planning and a severely limited surge capacity, although there is a generally high level of availability of equipment and supplies.
    Academic Emergency Medicine 12/2006; 13(11):1198-203. DOI:10.1197/j.aem.2006.05.007 · 2.01 Impact Factor
Show more