Working memory in patients with mild traumatic brain injury: functional MR imaging analysis.

Department of Radiology, Taipei Medical University/Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Radiology (Impact Factor: 6.34). 07/2012; 264(3):844-51. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112154
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To analyze brain activation patterns in response to tests of working memory after a mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI).
Research ethics committee approval and patient written informed consent were obtained. Brain activation patterns in response to n-back working memory tasks (n = 1, 2, 3) were assessed with functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in 20 patients with MTBI within 1 month after their injury and in 18 healthy control subjects. In n-back working memory tasks, participants monitored a series of number stimuli and were to indicate when the presented number was the same as that presented n back previously. Nine (45%) MTBI patients underwent follow-up functional MR imaging studies 6 weeks later. Digit span, a memory test for how many numbers a person can remember in sequence, and continuous performance test (CPT), a test that measures a person's sustained and selective attention and impulsivity, were also performed before functional MR imaging studies and outside the imager for each participant. Clinical data were analyzed by using t and χ(2) tests. Within-group, between-group, and initial and follow-up differences of functional MR imaging data were analyzed by using one-sample, two-sample, and paired t tests, respectively.
Groups were similar for sex (P = .75), years of education (P = .069), digit span (P = .37 for total score), CPT (P = .31, .27, and .43 for omission error, commission error, and hit reaction time, respectively), and accuracy of n-back working memory performance (P = .90, .11, and .39 for one-, two-, and three-back tasks, respectively). Brain activation patterns differed between MTBI patients and controls in response to increasing working memory loads (P < .01, uncorrected). Control subjects maintained their ability to increase activation in the working memory circuitry with each increase in working memory load. In contrast, MTBI patients were impaired in their ability to increase activation in working memory circuitry under both moderate and high working memory load conditions. However, MTBI patients did show cerebral plasticity, as evidenced by more activation in some areas outside and inside the working memory circuitry as compared with control subjects (P < .01, uncorrected). In the 6-week follow-up study, compared with baseline, MTBI patients showed an improvement of activation in response to increasing working memory loads (P < .05, uncorrected).
MTBI-induced differences in working memory functional activity were observed even though differences in behavioral performance between MTBI patients and controls were absent, which suggests that this approach may increase sensitivity to MTBI compared with neuropsychological evaluation alone.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reviewed herein are contemporary neuroimaging methods that detect abnormalities associated with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Despite advances in demonstrating underlying neuropathology in a subset of individuals who sustain mTBI, considerable disagreement persists in neuropsychology about mTBI outcome and metrics for evaluation. This review outlines a thesis for the select use of sensitive neuroimaging methods as potential biomarkers of brain injury recognizing that the majority of individuals who sustain an mTBI recover without neuroimaging signs or neuropsychological sequelae detected with methods currently applied. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides several measures that could serve as mTBI biomarkers including the detection of hemosiderin and white matter abnormalities, assessment of white matter integrity derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and quantitative measures that directly assess neuroanatomy. Improved prediction of neuropsychological outcomes in mTBI may be achieved with the use of targeted neuroimaging markers.
    Neuropsychology Review 08/2013; · 6.42 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background. Little research exists on acupuncture treatment's effect on patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods. Using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, we conducted a cohort study to compare the use of emergency care and hospitalization in TBI patients with and without acupuncture treatment in the first year after TBI. The adjusted relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of high use of emergency care and hospitalization associated with acupuncture treatment were calculated in multivariate Poisson regression models with generalized estimating equation. Results. The means of medical visits of emergency care and hospitalization were lower in TBI patients with acupuncture treatment than in those without acupuncture treatment. After adjustment, acupuncture treatment was associated with decreased risk of high emergency care visits (beta = -0.0611, P = 0.0452) and hospitalization (beta = -0.0989, P < 0.0001). The RRs of high medical visits and expenditure for hospitalization associated with acupuncture treatment were 0.62 (95% CI = 0.50-0.76) and 0.66 (95% CI = 0.53-0.83), respectively. Conclusion. Patients with TBI who receive acupuncture treatment have reduced the use of emergency care and hospitalization in the first year after injury. The mechanisms of effects of acupuncture on TBI warrant further investigations.
    Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 01/2013; 2013:262039. · 1.72 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The brain is highly plastic after stroke or epilepsy; however, there is a paucity of brain plasticity investigation after traumatic brain injury (TBI). This mini review summarizes the most recent evidence of brain plasticity in human TBI patients from the perspective of advanced magnetic resonance imaging. Similar to other forms of acquired brain injury, TBI patients also demonstrated both structural reorganization as well as functional compensation by the recruitment of other brain regions. However, the large scale brain network alterations after TBI are still unknown, and the field is still short of proper means on how to guide the choice of TBI rehabilitation or treatment plan to promote brain plasticity. The authors also point out the new direction of brain plasticity investigation.
    Neural Regeneration Research 01/2014; 9(7):693-700. · 0.14 Impact Factor


Available from
Jun 4, 2014