Globalisation and development: the relevance of classical “dependency” theory for the world today

International Social Science Journal 10/2011; 61(202):467 - 488. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2451.2011.01786.x

ABSTRACT The International Social Science Journal, founded by UNESCO in 1949, is published quarterly in six language editions: English, French, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese and Russian. Three decades ago, on the pages of this journal, the Swiss sociologist Volker Bornschier (1980), in a summary of path-breaking empirical investigations, which vindicated much of the thinking of the social sciences from Latin America, critical of the dependency relations of the global ‘South’ from the developed ‘North’, broke a long-standing taboo in the social sciences of the developed countries by predicting that the effects of multinational corporations on economic growth and social inequality in their host countries are not entirely positive. In the 103 countries, statistically investigated by Bornschier in the period 1960-1977, the short-term effect of fresh foreign direct investment for economic growth was found to be significantly positive; but the long-term effect of multinational corporations, especially in the poorer countries of Africa, Asian and Latin America, was significantly negative. Three decades of neo-liberalism ever since, of course, were characterized by the return to the old and up to the 1970s dominant belief that open markets, foreign direct investment, and non-intervention by governments are the ideal and only receipt for long-term stable economic growth and full employment. Is Bornschier’s message still valid, three decades later, in the middle of the biggest world economic recession since the 1930s? The aim of this article is to show the basic validity of the then research design and research question with the data of today. Should we in the global “North”, most seriously affected by the current crisis, finally learn the lessons offered by the experience of the periphery (i.e. the majority of the countries of Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean, and Oceania) and the semi-periphery (i.e. the countries which are positioned between the periphery and core countries, like China, India, and Mexico) in earlier periods of development in the world economy? And should especially Europe begin to study the experiences of Latin America and should it finally learn that dependence indeed has a critical impact on the overall long-term development trends of a nation and that it tends towards the polarization of social relations, which we now witness all over Europe? Now that dependency and penetration by the multinational corporations have risen in Europe to staggering proportions, as we will demonstrate in this article? The rediscovery of the radical ‘dependency’ perspective means a fundamental break with the existing dominant thinking on the subject during the current crisis in the global economy. The logic of European Union policy making, especially, is still geared towards the ‘internal market’ and the four ‘big’ freedoms of trade, capital, services and investment (Tausch, Ghymers, 2007).

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Our analysis, based on a variety of standard econometric techniques, aims to be a fairly comprehensive test of the hypotheses about long cycles, associated with the name of Kondratiev/Kondratieff. Our work tries to link the issue of long cycles with the issue of economic convergence and divergence in the world system, because there are very strong cyclical ups and downs of relative convergence in the world system, observable not just in the “national” growth rates and “national” economic cycles. Already the Japanese economist Kaname Akamatsu, who lived from August 7, 1896 to December 20, 1974, and who was a great admirer of Kondratiev/Kondratieff, hinted at this connection. His most well-known tribute to Kondratiev/Kondratieff (Akamatsu, 1961) specifically links the rise and decline of the global peripheries to the larger Kondratiev/Kondratieff cycle. His contribution, which is hardly ever mentioned nowadays in the framework of K-cycle research, is the starting point of our analysis. In fact, these “Akamatsu cycles”, analyzed in this work, are even stronger and seem to be more devastating than the “national Kondratiev/Kondratieff waves” and world systemic waves themselves, leading to the discovery of what might be even termed a “double-Tsunami wave structure”. Both our re-analysis of world industrial production growth data since 1741 as well as the global conflict data since 1495, presented in this article, cautiously support the earlier contentions of world system research with evidence, tested by spectral analysis and auto-correlation analysis. Using the well-known and now updated Maddison data base at, Kondratiev/Kondratieff cycles of around 60 years duration at a nation state level are most clearly visible in Argentina, Canada, and Russia, with evidence on the existence of longer cycles of more than 35 years also in Belgium; Chile; Greece; Netherlands; India; New Zealand; Spain; and USA; while for the other countries of the Maddison data set, earlier negative spectral density analysis results reported in the ample literature surveyed in this article could not be falsified. By contrast, the evidence about strong long term cycles of convergence seems to be very convincing. Future research is recommended to realize that convergence processes in most nations of the world are discontinuous and of a cyclical nature, thus supporting the pessimism inherent in the writings by the world systems scholar Giovanni Arrighi on the subject.


Available from
Jun 5, 2014