Henri Fayol: Administration Industrielle et G�n�rale ? a re-interpretation

The English translation of this book presents Fayol primarily as a writer on industrial management. In this paper, alternative translations of a number of key terms are proposed. Their acceptance would show Fayol to have been concerned with the development of a philosophy of administration in a much wider sense than the translation suggests. Mr. Brodie is on the staff of the Administrative Staff College, Henley.
Public Administration (Impact Factor: 1.57). 04/2007; 40(3):311 - 317. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1962.tb01288.x
404 Reads
  • Source
    • "However, the French word prevoyance had no precise meaning in English, so various authors (Coubrough, 1930; Storrs, 1949) translated it as planning. Brodie (1962) and current English dictionaries translate prevoyance as " foresight. " Various articles and papers about Fayol use the terms foresight and forecasting as well as planning when discussing Fayol's management functions (Breeze and Miner, 2002; Parker and Ritson, 2005b). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: Fayol's theories were the original foundation for management as a discipline and as a profession. Also Fayol was the first to advocate management education. Yet he has critics who revile him (or at least disparage his work) as well as followers who respect and revere him. This paper intends to enlighten today's practitioners and academicians about the relevance and value of Fayol's theories today. Design/methodology/approach: The paper addresses Fayol's contributions as well as the disparagement and the reverence. It compares Fayol's work with that of Follett, Mintzberg, Taylor, and Porter. In addition, it demonstrates the original and current interpretation and application of his theories. Finally, it indicates the alignment of Fayol's theories with strategic leadership and management. Findings: Fayol's theories are valuable and relevant for organizational leaders because Fayol was a practitioner who documented theories that worked best for him and his co-workers. While there are those who criticize Fayol's theories, there are many others who respect them and find them useful as academicians and as practitioners. The theory of management functions aligns well with strategic leadership and management models and theories. Originality/value: The paper is the first to integrate Fayol's theories with a strategic leadership model.
    Journal of Management History 09/2010; 16(4):489-503. DOI:10.1108/17511341011073960
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of Fayol's ideas on both British management thought and practice. Design/methodology/approach – The paper presents a schematic which seeks to illustrate the links between the various strands of scientific management theory, especially that of Fayol, in Britain between the 1920s and the 1960s/1970s and, for the same period, the links between the theory and practice of scientific management. The links indicated in the schematic are assessed first through an examination of the development of British management thought, in particular the exemplification of Fayol's ideas by Lyndall Fownes Urwick and the British neoclassical school. Using archival evidence from a small number of engineering companies, the impact on practice of the ideas of Fayol and other aspects of scientific management is then examined. Findings – The paper concludes that, while Fayol's theoretical influence has stood the test of time, his impact on practice was much more limited. Originality/value – By focusing on the historical impact on practice of management theory, this paper not only provides a basis for future research by business and management historians, but also throws light on the relevance for practice of theory, an issue of relevance for all theoreticians and management practitioners.
    Management Decision 11/2005; 43(10):1317-1334. DOI:10.1108/00251740510634895 · 1.42 Impact Factor