Article

Bisection of equine embryos

Animal Reproduction Laboratory, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA
Equine Veterinary Journal (Impact Factor: 2.37). 06/2010; 21(S8):129 - 133. DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1989.tb04697.x

ABSTRACT Three experiments were designed to evaluate methods of bisecting equine embryos. Viability of demi-embryos was compared to whole embryos in vitro and in vivo. In Experiment 1, Day 6 embryos were bisected either using a standard micromanipulation technique or a manual split of embryos that were adhered to a petri dish. Viability was assessed by culture in vitro. Bisected embryos in both groups increased in size during culture and developed normally. In general, manual bisection was accomplished with less difficulty and time than the micromanipulation method. Eleven additional embryos were bisected manually and both halves transferred surgically into the same recipient (Experiment 2). More pregnancies were obtained from transfer of twin whole embryos (16/22) compared to bisected, demi-embryos (5/22). In Experiment 3, 30 embryos were bisected manually; 15 were encapsulated in agar chip. Both halves were transferred non-surgically to each recipient. Fifteen whole embryos were transferred non-surgically to recipients as controls. The number of vesicles per original embryo was greater for whole embryos than for demi-embryos in agar chips.

0 Followers
 · 
148 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The development of methods to produce embryos in vitro in the horse has been delayed compared with other domestic species. Oocytes can be collected from excised ovaries or from the small or preovulatory follicles of live mares. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection is the only reliable method to fertilize equine oocytes in vitro. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection-produced embryos can be transferred into the oviducts of recipient mares or cultured to the morula or blastocyst stage of development for nonsurgical embryo transfers into recipients' uteri. Embryos cultured in vitro have some morphological differences compared with embryos collected from the mares' uteri. Most notably, the embryonic capsule does not form in culture, and the zona pellucida fails to expand completely. However, embryo produced in vitro can result in viable pregnancies and healthy offspring.
    Journal of Equine Veterinary Science 07/2012; 32(7):367-371. DOI:10.1016/j.jevs.2012.05.054 · 0.89 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Two 3-generation full-sibling reference families have been produced and form a unique resource for genetic linkage mapping studies in the horse. The F(2) generations, now comprising 61 individuals, consist of 28- to 32-day-old embryos removed nonsurgically from two pairs of identical twin mares. The same stallion sired all F(2)s such that the two full-sibling families are half-sibling with respect to each other. The families are crossbred to maximize levels of heterozygosity and include Arabian, Thoroughbred, Welsh Cob, and Icelandic Horse breeds. Milligram quantities of DNA have been isolated from each embryo and from blood samples of the parents and grandparents. The families have been genotyped with 353 equine microsatellites and 6 biallelic markers, and 42 linkage groups were formed. In addition, the physical location of 85 of the markers is known, and this has allowed 37 linkage groups to be anchored to the physical map. The inclusion of dams in the genotyping analysis has allowed the generation of a genetic map of the X chromosome. Markers have been assigned to all 31 autosomes and the X chromosome. The average interval between markers on the map is 10.5 cM, and the linkage groups collectively span 1780 cM. The results demonstrate the benefits for horse linkage mapping studies of genotyping on these unique full-sibling families, which comprise relatively few individuals, by the generation of a comprehensive low-density map of the horse genome.
    Genomics 07/2000; 66(2):123-34. DOI:10.1006/geno.2000.6207 · 2.79 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: München, Univ., Diss., 2003.