Applying mixed methods under the framework of theory‐driven evaluations
ABSTRACT The application of mixed methods under the framework of theory-driven evaluations can minimize the potential tension and conflict of mixing qualitative and quantitative methods, as well as compensate for each method's weaknesses. Mixed methods should not be applied indiscriminantly, however, but rather contingently under particular conditions as described in this chapter.
- SourceAvailable from: Nicholas Mutua09/2013;
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Abstract In this paper, we describe the use of a mixed method design to evaluate the impact of an integrated assessment system on science teachers’ assessment perceptions and practice. This design was selected to address the methodological challenges of multilevel and multisite evaluation presented by a complex innovation. We provide an example of a cross-level exploratory analysis, facilitated by the integration of quantitative and qualitative methods; this provides one solution to the interpretation of multilevel, multisite evaluation data when a purposive sample is too small to use sophisticated quantitative techniques. The findings indicate that aggregated results would be misleading and discrepant cases would be masked. 1 Evaluating the Effects of an Integrated Assessment System on Science Teachers’ Assessment Perceptions and Practice The Science Education for Public Understanding Program received funds from the National