The Development Manager's Advisory System: A Knowledge‐Based DSS Tool for Project Assessment*

Decision Sciences (Impact Factor: 1.36). 06/2007; 24(5):953 - 976. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1993.tb00498.x

ABSTRACT This research investigates whether the knowledge-based decision support system (KBDSS) paradigm provides the necessary supporting structure and developmental framework for product development evaluation. To address the research questions posed in this study, it is necessary to develop and implement KBDSS's at specific decision points along the product development cycle. This paper describes the design, development, and implementation of a KBDSS to support a product development manager's decision concerning full-scale development of a new product. From the systems design perspective, this paper addresses the integration and innovative use of a variety of techniques for knowledge acquisition, modeling, and processing. The approach utilized obtains the benefits of normative modeling as well as the flexibility and developmental advantages of knowledge-based systems. Since its implementation, the system has been successfully used by a development manager to support his recommendation for an ongoing project. His complete satisfaction with this system served as the impetus for the design and development of a multi-expert system which was implemented at the strategic level.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of this paper is to summarize the past and present literature on project portfolio selection. In particular, it highlights six groups of project portfolio selection methods. Based on the literature review, the content of this paper could be used as a basis for future study in this topic.
    Management of Innovation and Technology, 2008. ICMIT 2008. 4th IEEE International Conference on; 10/2008
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The article aims to build a model that can evaluate the various factors that contribute to the perceived risk of early mortality of Micro and Small Enterprises (MSE). The factors were extracted from a study conducted by Filardi (2006), with one hundred MSE provided by Junta Comercial de São Paulo (JUCESP), on which factors have contributed to the premature death of these companies. This exploratory work suggests Methodology Multicriteria Decision Aid Constructivist (MCDA-C) to identify the perceived risks of these factors. As a result the model can assist local entrepreneurs to avoid the possibility of his company to increase the mortality statistics of early MSE. O objetivo do artigo é construir um modelo que possa avaliar os diversos fatores que contribuem para o risco percebido de mortalidade precoce de Micro e Pequenas Empresas (MPE). Os fatores foram extraídos de uma pesquisa elaborada por Filardi (2006), com cem MPE disponibilizadas pela Junta Comercial de São Paulo (JUCESP), sobre quais fatores que contribuíram para a mortalidade prematura dessas empresas. Esse trabalho de caráter exploratório propõe a Metodologia Multicritério de Apoio à Decisão Construtivista (MCDAC) para identificar os riscos percebidos desses fatores. Como resultado o modelo pode auxiliar o empreendedor a se precaver da possibilidade de sua empresa aumentar as estatísticas de mortalidade precoce das MPE.
    Revista da Micro e Pequena Empresa, ISSN 1982-2537, Vol. 3, Nº. 3, 2010, pags. 111-126. 01/2010;
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper describes the development of a prototype expert system for the selection of design patterns that are used in object-oriented software. Design patterns provide one method of software reuse, which supports the goal of improved software development productivity. The prototype system represents an initial step towards providing an automated solution regarding the design pattern application problem, i.e. leading a designer to a suitable design pattern which is applicable to the problem at hand. The feasibility of using expert system technology to aid in the selection problem is demonstrated.
    Expert Systems 01/2006; 23:39-52. · 0.77 Impact Factor


Available from
May 28, 2014