Middle school classroom predictors of science persistence

International Center for the Advancement of Scientific Literacy, Chicago Academy of Science, Chicago, Illinois 60614
Journal of Research in Science Teaching (Impact Factor: 2.64). 08/2006; 31(7):721 - 734. DOI: 10.1002/tea.3660310705

ABSTRACT Very little research has been conducted to determine whether instructional practices experienced by young adolescents have lasting effects that can be connected to persistence in the study of science years later. The current study examined the question of whether variables associated with middle school classroom practices and instructional emphasis would contribute to a prediction of science course placement in the 11th grade. A LISREL analysis was performed to create a model that ties middle school classroom experiences to later course placement. Variables associated with a holistic approach to science and with clarity of presentation were retained in the final model.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Against a background of disappointing percentages of students choosing exact and technical studies and the academic choice research tradition, a study into the choice of physics in secondary education has been carried out. It focuses on the predictive value of certain characteristics of the curriculum, the differences between schools and the stability of the choice variable. Two cohorts of students in a representative sample of schools filled in written questionnaires, four times in two years. The data were analysed in several ways that complemented each other, including multilevel analysis. The main predictor of the choice of physics in secondary education is perceived future relevance and no significant differences between schools exist. The choice variable is not stable. Many students feel uncertain about their choice of study and profession. Academic choice processes should be more connected with career choice processes. Certain characteristics of the physics curriculum can be expected to further the possibilities for students to experience physics and physics-like contents and problems as being personally meaningful and interesting.
    International Journal of Science Education 01/2000; 22(12). · 1.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reflective thinking is important to young adolescents as they develop their thinking skills. Various instructional methods have been recommended to support reflective thinking, yet the nature of the underlying factors of these methods is unclear. Exploratory factor analysis was used to determine the factors prompting reflective thinking. Results of this study suggest that young students perceived three clusters of methods as supporting their reflection: reflective learning environments, reflective teaching methods, and reflective scaffolding tools. A one-way within subjects ANOVA showed that the most helpful factor was the reflective learning environment, with the most helpful elements being freedom and collaboration. Students' perceptions of concept- mapping and reflective-question prompts were found to differ significantly across gender. Recommendations are provided for designing learning environments that prompt reflective thinking.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The U.S. is investing millions of dollars each year on developing resources to inspire students to pursue science. To assure that these investments are meeting the educational systems' goals it is important to understand the strength of relationships among the types of resources used in middle school science and levels of student interest in pursuing science careers. Is using information from outside the classroom---through human and web resources---in science class related to middle school students' level of interest in science careers? Is using human and/or web resources predictive of boys' science career interest...of girls'? Is using web resources in the science predictive of science career interests for those students who are or are not pre-disposed to pursuing science? This study investigated the types of resources used regularly in the science based on their sociableness, providing supportive information through human and nonhuman resources, and webnicity, the interconnectedness of supportive information. There were four major findings. First, there was a significant relationship between the use of human and web resources and high science career interests for middle school students. Second, the use of human resources during science was predictive of both boys' and girls' science career interests. The use of web resources during science was only predictive of girls' science career interests. The use of both human and web resources together was predictive of high science career interests for girls', but not predictive for boys'. Third, when web resources were used there were stronger relationships among several student characteristics and science career interests. Fourth, in classrooms where teachers did not have science degrees, the use of web resources was predictive of higher student science career interest. Understanding these relationships can help educators develop and secure resources that empirically have been shown to be predictive of high science career interest. This may help reduce the risk that large investments in new educational resources will go unmatched in student outcomes. The results of this study confirmed that students in this sample who were exposed to resources high in sociableness and high in webnicity had higher interests in science careers.