Article

Evaluation of natural and synthetic compounds according to their antioxidant activity using a multivariate approach

European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology (impact factor: 1.73). 03/2009; 111(11):1090 - 1099. DOI:10.1002/ejlt.200800215 pp.1090 - 1099

ABSTRACT The antioxidant activity of natural and synthetic compounds was evaluated using five in vitro methods: ferric reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydradzyl (DPPH), oxygen radical absorption capacity (ORAC), oxidation of an aqueous dispersion of linoleic acid accelerated by azo-initiators (LAOX), and oxidation of a meat homogenate submitted to a thermal treatment (TBARS). All results were expressed as Trolox equivalents. The application of multivariate statistical techniques suggested that the phenolic compounds (caffeic acid, carnosic acid, genistein and resveratrol), beyond their high antioxidant activity measured by the DPPH, FRAP and TBARS methods, showed the highest ability to react with the radicals in the ORAC methodology, compared to the other compounds evaluated in this study (ascorbic acid, erythorbate, tocopherol, BHT, Trolox, tryptophan, citric acid, EDTA, glutathione, lecithin, methionine and tyrosine). This property was significantly correlated with the number of phenolic rings and catecholic structure present in the molecule. Based on a multivariate analysis, it is possible to select compounds from different clusters and explore their antioxidant activity interactions in food products.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
8 Views

Keywords

antioxidant activity
 
antioxidant activity interactions
 
ascorbic acid
 
caffeic acid
 
carnosic acid
 
citric acid
 
ferric reducing/antioxidant power
 
food products
 
highest ability
 
linoleic acid
 
meat homogenate
 
multivariate analysis
 
multivariate statistical techniques
 
ORAC methodology
 
oxygen radical absorption capacity
 
phenolic compounds
 
phenolic rings
 
synthetic compounds
 
Trolox equivalents
 
vitro methods
 

Caroline D. Capitani