Article

Posterior tibial nerve sensory blockade duration prolonged by adding dexmedetomidine to ropivacaine.

FRCPC,Université Laval, Département d'anesthésie 2705, boul Laurier, local 2206 Québec, Qc, Canada G1V 4G2. .
Anesthesia and analgesia (Impact Factor: 3.08). 07/2012; 115(4):958-62. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318265bab7
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Dexmedetomidine, an α(2)-receptor agonist, prolongs analgesia when used in neuraxial and IV blocks. We evaluated the effect of dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine for tibial nerve block on the duration of the sensory blockade.
For this prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, crossover trial, 14 healthy volunteers were allocated to 2 groups. All volunteers received an ultrasound-guided tibial nerve block 4 to 5 cm proximally to the medial malleolus. In group R, 10 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine was injected for the block; in group RD, 10 mL of a solution containing 0.5% ropivacaine with 1 μg/kg of dexmedetomidine was administered. After the injection, monitoring of vital signs, evaluation of onset and resolution of sensory block, and level of sedation (Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale) were performed. Three weeks later, the same procedure was repeated, but the study subjects were allocated to the other group in a crossover fashion. The primary end point was the duration of sensory blockade. The time and carryover effects were also evaluated. Secondary outcomes were the onset time and the presence of adverse effects such as hypotension, bradycardia, hypoxia, and sedation.
Sensory blocks lasted longer in group RD than in group R (21.5 vs 16.2 hours; mean pairwise difference 5.3 hours [95% confidence interval: 3.9-6.7 hours]; P < 0.0001). Onset times were similar between groups. The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels were stable throughout the study period in group R. In group RD, a noticeable decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure was observed between 60 and 480 minutes (P < 0.05); 2 volunteers experienced a 30% decrease in systolic blood pressure when compared with the baseline value as compared with none in group R. Heart rate was similar between groups except at 60 minutes (P < 0.01).
Dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine for tibial nerve block prolongs the duration of sensory blockade with similar onset time. However, patients should be monitored for potential adverse effects such as hypotension, bradycardia, and sedation.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
91 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dexmedetomidine is an alpha 2 adrenergic agonist, prolongs analgesia when used in neuraxial and peripheral nerve blocks. We studied the effect of addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine to perform transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block.
    Saudi journal of anaesthesia. 04/2014; 8(2):161-6.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Perineural dexamethasone has been investigated as an adjuvant for brachial plexus nerve blocks, but it is not known whether the beneficial effect of perineural dexamethasone on analgesia duration leads to a better quality of surgical recovery. We hypothesized that patients receiving dexamethasone would have a better quality of recovery than patients not receiving dexamethasone. We also sought to compare the effect of perineural with that of IV dexamethasone on block characteristics. Patients undergoing elective ankle and foot surgery were recruited over a 9-month period. Patients received ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve blocks by using 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:300,000 (0.45 mL/kg) and were randomized into 3 groups: group 1 = perineural dexamethasone 8 mg/2 mL with 50 mL IV normal saline, group 2 = perineural saline/2 mL with IV 8 mg dexamethasone in 50 mL normal saline, and group 3 = perineural saline/2 mL with 50 mL normal saline. The primary outcome was the global score in the quality of recovery (QoR-40). The secondary outcomes included analgesia duration, opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, numeric pain rating scores, and postoperative neurologic symptoms. Eighty patients were randomized, and 78 patients completed the study protocol. There was no improvement in the global QoR-40 score at 24 hours between the perineural dexamethasone and saline, median (97.5% CI) difference of -3 (-7 to 3); IV dexamethasone and saline, median difference of -1 (-8 to 5); or perineural dexamethasone and IV dexamethasone median difference of -2 (-6 to 5). Analgesia duration (P < 0.001) and time to first toe movement (P < 0.001) were prolonged by perineural dexamethasone compared with saline. IV dexamethasone prolonged time to first toe movement compared with saline (P = 0.008) but not analgesia duration (P = 0.18). There was no significant difference in the time to first toe movement or analgesia duration between the perineural and IV dexamethasone groups. Postoperative opioid consumption was not different among study groups. Self-reported neurologic symptoms at 24 hours were not different among perinueral dexamethasone (17, 63%), IV dexamethasone (10, 42%), or normal saline (8, 30%) (P = 0.31). All postoperative neurologic sequelae were resolved by 8 weeks. Preoperative administration of IV and perineural dexamethasone compared with saline did not improve overall QoR-40 or decrease opioid consumption but did prolong analgesic duration in patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery and receiving sciatic nerve block. Given the lack of clinical benefit and the concern of dexamethasone neurotoxicity as demonstrated in animal studies, the practice of perineural dexamethasone administration needs to be further evaluated.
    Anesthesia and analgesia 03/2014; · 3.08 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dexmedetomidine extends the duration of nerve block when administered perineurally together with local anesthetics by central and/or peripheral action. In this study, we compared the duration of nerve block between dexmedetomidine and epinephrine as an adjuvant to 1% mepivacaine in infraclavicular brachial plexus block.
    Korean journal of anesthesiology. 04/2014; 66(4):283-9.