Short-Term Outcomes after Combined Colon and Liver Resection for Synchronous Colon Cancer Liver Metastases: A Population Study

Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA, .
Annals of Surgical Oncology (Impact Factor: 3.94). 07/2012; 20(1). DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2515-z
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: The timing of surgical resection for stage IV colon cancer with liver metastasis and the safety of simultaneous colon and liver resection remains controversial. The purpose of our study was to evaluate short-term outcomes after combined colon and liver resection (CCLR) versus colon resection (CR) or liver resection alone (LR) using a population database. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample was used to select patients who had surgery for colon cancer from 2002 to 2006. We evaluated for in-hospital morbidity, mortality, and prolonged length of stay (PLOS). Our analysis was done using design-weighted unadjusted analysis and logistic regression. RESULTS: We identified 361,096 patients during our study period (CCLR 3,625; CR 322,286; LR 35,185). CCLR was not associated with an increased risk of complications (odds ratio (OR) 1.12; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.94-1.33; P = 0.21) or PLOS (OR 1.19; 95 % CI 0.99-1.4; P = 0.06) compared with CR. In-hospital mortality occurred in 3.5 % of patients who underwent CCLR and was not significantly associated with mortality compared with CR alone (OR 1.17; 95 % CI 0.79-1.74; P = 0.43). Liver lobectomy with CR was associated with a PLOS and a trend toward increased morbidity and mortality. Significant predictors of complications, mortality, and PLOS included: age >70 years, male gender, nonprivate health insurance, and Elixhauser score >1. CONCLUSIONS: CCLR with limited liver resection can be performed with similar morbidity and mortality to colectomy alone. For patients who require hepatic lobectomy, however, strong consideration should be given to a staged approach.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Transforming growth factor β (TGF-β)/Smad signaling is involved in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) development and progression. The frequent loss of SMAD4 is associated with liver metastasis and poor prognosis of CRC, but the underlying mechanism remains elusive. This study aimed to elucidate the role of Smad independent TGF-β signaling in CRC metastasis. Immunohistochemistry showed that Smad4 level was negatively correlated with TNM stage and phospho-ERK level in human CRCs and liver metastasis samples. Knockdown of Smad4 in CT26 and HCT116 cells activated ERK pathway, altered the expression of MMP2 and COX-2, promoted cell motility, migration and invasion in vitro, enhanced metastasis and shortened the survival of metastatic tumor-bearing mice. MEK inhibitor U0126 and GSK1120212 inhibited the motility, migration and invasion of Smad4 knockdown cells, inhibited metastasis and prolonged the survival of metastatic tumor-bearing mice. Furthermore, MEK inhibitor could reverse the changes of phospho-ERK, MMP2 and COX-2 levels. In conclusion, our results indicate that ERK pathway plays a key oncogenic role in CRC with SMAD4 inactivation mutations, and implicate ERK as a potential therapeutic target for CRC liver metastasis.
    Cancer biology & therapy 09/2013; 14(11). DOI:10.4161/cbt.26427 · 3.63 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It remains unclear whether primary colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases (SLMs) should be resected simultaneously or with a staged procedure. We reviewed the short-term outcomes of 127 patients who underwent simultaneous resection of primary colorectal cancer and SLM at our institution from January 1993 to December 2011. The proportion of simultaneous resections was 84.7% (127 of 150 patients). There was no postoperative mortality, and the postoperative complication rate was 61.4%. Major complications occurred in 23 (18.2%) patients, and anastomotic failure occurred in 2 (1.6%). The 3-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates were 74%, 64%, and 52%, respectively. The median recurrence-free survival period was 7.0 months (95% confidence interval, 4.5-9.5 months) and the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 17%. Simultaneous resection can be performed safely in patients with colorectal cancer and SLM.
    Surgery 10/2013; 155(3). DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.015 · 3.11 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Currently, resection criteria for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM) are only limited by remnant liver function. Morbidity and survival after a partial hepatectomy with limited or extended indication criteria were compared. Between 1991 and 2010, patients undergoing a liver resection for CRCLM with limited (n = 169) or extended indication criteria (n = 129) were retrospectively identified in a prospectively collected single-centre database. Limited indication criteria were defined as less than three unilateral, not centrally located liver metastases in the absence of extra hepatic metastases. The extended criteria were only limited by predicted remnant liver volume and patients fitness. Data on co-morbidity, resection margin, short- and long-term morbidity, disease-free (DFS) and overall survival were compared. Patients with limited indications had less major complications (19.5% vs. 33.1%, P < 0.01), longer overall survival of 68.8 months [confidence interval (CI) 46.5-91.1] vs. 41.4 months (CI 33.4-49.0, P ≤ 0.001) and longer median DFS of 22.0 months [confidence interval (CI) 15.8-28.2] vs 10.2 months (CI 8.4-11.9, P < 0.001) compared with the extended indication group. Cure rates, defined as 10-year DFS, were 35.5% and 15.8%, respectively. Fewer patients in the extended indication group underwent an R0 resection (92.9% vs. 77.5%, P < 0.001). Only 17% of all R1 resected patients had recurrences at the transection plane. A partial hepatectomy for CRCLM with extended indications seems justified but is associated with higher complication rates, earlier recurrence and lower overall survival compared with limited indications. However, the median 5-year survival was substantial and a cure was achieved in 15.8% of patients.
    HPB 11/2013; DOI:10.1111/hpb.12181 · 2.05 Impact Factor
Show more