Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas: Clinical and pathological features of 33 cases

Department of Surgical Oncology, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University College of Medicine, No. 88 Jiefang Road, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
Surgery Today (Impact Factor: 1.53). 07/2012; 43(2). DOI: 10.1007/s00595-012-0260-3
Source: PubMed


Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) are rare pancreatic tumors, with a low potential for malignancy. The clinical and pathological features of 33 SPNs were reviewed.

This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 33 patients who underwent surgery for a pathologically confirmed SPN from 2000 to 2011.

Thirty of the 33 patients (91 %) were female, and the median age at diagnosis was 29.2 years (range 12-59). The most common symptom was abdominal discomfort with dull pain (58 %). Others included asymptomatic lesions that were only detected incidentally during imaging (21 %), a palpable abdominal mass (15 %) and indigestion (6 %). All 33 patients underwent surgery with a curative intent and 3 (9 %) underwent laparoscopic surgery. The mean diameter of the tumors was 4.9 cm (range 2-15 cm), and they occurred in the head (9, 27 %), neck (5, 15 %), body or tail (19, 58 %) of the pancreas. One patient had lymph node metastases, one patient had portal venous invasion and 8 patients had perineural invasion. The patient follow-up ranged from 4 to 118 months, and 32 patients were alive and well without recurrence. One patient relapsed 10 months after distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy and underwent a second surgery via laparotomy. Unfortunately, the patient died of multiple organ failure 12 days after the second surgery.

SPNs are rare neoplasms with malignant potential but excellent prognosis. Adequate surgical resection, including laparoscopic surgery, may therefore be performed safely and is associated with a long-term survival, even in invasive cases.

9 Reads
  • Source
    • "To date, around 700 cases have been reported [1], more than two-thirds of them in the last 10 years [10] [11]. This probably reflects the increasing awareness of the clinicopathologic and radiographic features of SPN and the uniformity of the nomenclature used for SPN in the last years. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) of the pancreas is a rare tumor which typically affects young women without significant clinical symptoms. SPN usually shows an indolent behavior and only rare cases recur and/or metastasize after complete resection. We report our experience with four cases of SPN of the pancreas. All four patients were female with an age range of 15-42 years (mean age: 24.5 years). Two patients presented with abdominal pain, one with abdominal mass and one with acute abdominal signs following blunt trauma. Tumor's size ranged from 1 to 16 cm (mean size: 5.5 cm). Two tumors were diagnosed preoperatively through percutaneous core needle biopsy and two underwent surgery without preoperative diagnosis because of high suspicion of SPN based on clinical and radiological findings. By immunohistochemistry, all cases stained strongly for vimentin, progesterone-receptor and beta-catenin (nuclear) and variably with pankeratin and neuroendocrine markers. The proliferation index (Ki-67) was <2% in all cases. After a median follow-up of 40 months (range: 24-57 months), all patients were alive with no evidence of recurrence or metastatic disease. In conclusion, SPN of the pancreas should be considered in the differential diagnosis of any solid and partly cystic pancreatic or upper abdominal mass, particularly in young females. SPN possesses a low malignant potential and complete surgical resection with clear margins is the treatment of choice. Following R0 resection, SPN has an excellent prognosis.
    International journal of clinical and experimental pathology 05/2013; 6(6):1051-9. · 1.89 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "These laparoscopic procedures of enucleation and distal pancreatectomy have already been considered to be feasible [20] [21] [22] and have shown good indications for the low-grade malignant SPT [11] [21] [22]. It was mentioned that there were no statistically significant differences in the postoperative complications and the prognosis between laparoscopic surgery and ordinary surgery for SPT [20]. With regard to SPT, parenchyma preserving surgical procedure with laparoscopy should be considered if the tumor is small in size and located away from the main pancreatic duct. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) is an uncommon neoplasm of the pancreas. A rare case of spontaneous rupture of SPT is reported. A 13-year-old female felt acute abdominal pain without blunt abdominal trauma. Enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed a tumor in the pancreas tail with fluid collection around it. The tumor was diagnosed as SPT with hemoperitoneum associated with spontaneous rupture. The bleeding was stopped conservatively and she was referred for surgery at three months after the rupture. At that time, CT revealed a tumor 4 cm in diameter, which protruded from pancreas tail without distant metastases. Since peritoneal dissemination was not seen on intraoperative exploration, laparoscopic enucleation was performed. Pathologically, the tumor was diagnosed as SPT with rupture of the capsule of tumor, and complete resection was confirmed. The patient has been followed up for two years, and she is alive without recurrence.
    Case Reports in Medicine 04/2013; 2013:953240. DOI:10.1155/2013/953240
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) are low-grade malignancies with an excellent prognosis, albeit with the potential for metastatic disease. This study details our institution's experience with the diagnosis and treatment of SPN, including clinical presentation, multimodality imaging findings, and potential predictors of aggressive tumor behavior. The institutional pathology database was searched through for all cases of SPN since 1988, yielding 51 patients. The electronic medical record was searched for clinical and demographic information regarding these patients, including age, sex, presenting symptoms, type of surgery, postoperative length of stay, tumor markers, and postsurgical follow-up. All available imaging data were reviewed, including those of 30 patients who underwent multidetector computed tomography, those of 9 patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), those of 3 patients who underwent conventional ultrasound, and those of 11 patients who underwent endoscopic ultrasound. A total of 84% of patients were females, with a mean age of only 33 years. Prognosis was excellent, with a mean follow-up of 3 years without recurrence. Only 1 of the 51 patients developed metastatic disease to the liver 8 years after the surgery. On computed tomography, lesions tended to be large (5.3 cm), well circumscribed (29/30), round/oval (20/30), and encapsulated (23/30). The lesions often demonstrated calcification (14/30) and typically resulted in no biliary or pancreatic ductal dilatation. The lesions ranged from completely cystic to completely solid. On MRI, the lesions often demonstrated a T2 hypointense or enhancing capsule (6/9) and demonstrated internal blood products (5/9). The lesions tended to be devoid of vascularity on conventional ultrasound. Ten patients were found to have "aggressive" histology at presentation (T3 tumor, nodal involvement, perineural invasion, or vascular invasion). No demographic, clinical, or multidetector computed tomographic imaging features were found to correlate with aggressive histology. Certain imaging features (eg, well-circumscribed mass with calcification, peripheral capsule, internal blood products, and lack of biliary/pancreatic ductal obstruction) on computed tomography and MRI are highly suggestive of the diagnosis of SPN, particularly when visualized in young female patients. However, it is not possible to predict aggressive histology on the basis of imaging findings, clinical presentation, or patient demographic features.
    Journal of computer assisted tomography 09/2013; 37(5):824-33. DOI:10.1097/RCT.0b013e31829d44fa · 1.41 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications