Article

Destruction of public and governmental experiments of GMO in Europe

Laboratory Physiologie Cellulaire Végétale (CEA/CNRS/INRA/Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble)
GM crops & food 10/2012; 3(4):258-64. DOI: 10.4161/gmcr.21231
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The purpose of this article is to compile the destruction of GMO trials from academic or governmental research institutes in Europe, in a factual manner and to highlight their main characteristics. About 80 acts of vandalism against academic or governmental research on GMOs are identified, mainly in 4 countries; namely France, Germany, the United Kingdom and Switzerland. Examples are also provided for Italy and Belgium. The general conclusions that can be drawn from these acts are also discussed.

Full-text

Available from: Marcel Kuntz, Jun 09, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
96 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Food security is a global concern and substantial yield increases in crops are required to feed the growing world population. Mutagenesis is an important tool in crop improvement and is free of the regulatory restrictions imposed on genetically modified organisms. TILLING (Targeting Induced Local Lesions in Genomes), which combines traditional chemical mutagenesis with high-throughput genome-wide screening for point mutations in desired genes, offers a powerful way to create novel mutant alleles for both functional genomics and improvement of crops. TILLING is generally applicable to genomes whether small or large, diploid or even allohexaploid, and shows great potential to address the major challenge of linking sequence information to the function of genes and to modulate key traits for plant breeding. TILLING has been successfully applied in many crop species and recent progress in TILLING is summarized below, especially on the developments in mutation detection technology, application of TILLING in gene functional studies and crop breeding. The potential of TILLING/EcoTILLING for functional genetics and crop improvement is also discussed. Furthermore, a small scale forward strategy including backcross and selfing was conducted to release the potential mutant phenotypes masked in M2 (or M3 ) plants.
    Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 03/2014; DOI:10.1111/jipb.12192 · 3.45 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Molecular Plant Pathology 02/2014; 15(2):119-21. DOI:10.1111/mpp.12087 · 4.49 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article considers the protests through which a group of New Zealand women—MAdGE (Mothers Against Genetic Engineering in Food and the Environment)—enacted a campaign against genetic modification in food. Referring to the predominant visual/symbolic makeup of its efforts to communicate an alternative perspective on the research involved, the article examines the theatrics, posters, and disruptive protest of MAdGE’s campaign. A major feature of the analysis concerns a billboard that provoked outrage in some quarters and led to official deliberations concerning the advertising code of practice in which public morality and the epistemic authority of science were intertwined.
    Science Communication 08/2013; 35(4):502-527. DOI:10.1177/1075547012469116 · 2.08 Impact Factor