Article

Optimizing the safety and practice of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: The role of echogenic technology

aSchool of Medicine and Pharmacology, The University of Western Australia bSir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Current opinion in anaesthesiology (Impact Factor: 2.53). 07/2012; 25(5):603-9. DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328356b835
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Significant improvements have been made in the quality of ultrasound imaging, and it is now much easier to see nerves. However, the key to safe ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia is to be able to direct the needle to the target. This relies on good needle visibility. We review the recent advances that have been made in this crucial area.
Echogenic needles can improve shaft and tip visibility independent of experience level, compensate for suboptimal scanning technique, allow steeper insertion angles, reduce technical difficulty, and increase both confidence and satisfaction by anesthesiologists. An echogenic needle encourages holding the probe in one place on the patient, only advancing the needle when it can be seen, hence reducing the likelihood of quality-compromising behaviors. The poor visibility of nonechogenic needles when inserted at steeper angles commonly causes the observer to underestimate the insertion depth of the needle. Significant differences in echogenicity are found when comparing the currently available needles.
Good echogenic needles should increase safety, efficacy, and simplicity, and hopefully further drive the adoption of ultrasound-guided techniques, to the benefit of our patients.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Graham Hocking, Aug 17, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
104 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Needle visualization in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia can be improved by using needles of echogenic design with higher rate of reflection of ultrasound waves. Imaging solutions such as compound imaging might further improve imaging of both needle and tissue; these effects have not yet been studied. We hypothesized that compound imaging would significantly improve needle visibility, regardless of the insertion angle or needle type used. The effects of compound imaging on needle artifacts and tissue imaging were also investigated. METHODS: A total of 200 video clips of in-plane needle insertions were obtained in embalmed cadavers with a conventional needle and an echogenic needle at 5 different insertion angles, with both conventional B-mode ultrasound imaging and compound imaging technology. Visibility of the needle shaft and needle tip as well as the needle artifact rate were assessed by a blinded investigator on a 4-point ordinal scale. The effects on tissue image quality and speckle artifacts were also assessed. Stepwise linear regression was performed to differentiate effects on needle visibility scores. RESULTS: Imaging of the needle shaft and tip was significantly enhanced when compound imaging technology was used (P < 0.0001). Use of echogenically designed needles or shallow needle insertion angles improved visibility of both shaft and tip (both P < 0.0001). With compound imaging, there are fewer needle artifacts, and tissue imaging quality and speckle artifact rate are significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: Compound imaging technology enhances needle imaging with both echogenic and conventional needles. Tissue imaging and speckle artifacts are also optimized. Echogenic needle design results in better needle visibility scores in both B-mode and compound imaging.
    Regional anesthesia and pain medicine 06/2013; 38(5). DOI:10.1097/AAP.0b013e31829730d5 · 2.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Urologists are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of pre-treatment percutaneous renal biopsy of small renal cortical neoplasms. A barrier to the routine performance of ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy has been the technical challenges associated with the procedure. We evaluated a new modified needle, which incorporates an echogenic needle tip designed to improve the needle tip's visibility under ultrasound visualization. We evaluated and compared the ultrasonic imaging quality of the echogenic needle (EN) and a standard needle (SN). Forty-eight participants were recruited to perform ultrasound-guided needle targeting and drainage of a simulated cyst within a phantom model. The simulated cysts were embedded in an opaque gel mold. Each participant was blinded to the type of needle being deployed and was asked to identify and aspirate the simulated cyst with each needle under ultrasound guidance. Each needle was tested at three ultrasound-aiming angles, (0, 15, and 30 degrees). The quality of needle visibility under ultrasound imaging was assessed via a questionnaire, including needle preference and a visibility score (1-10) at each aiming angle. Participants were stratified by level of ultrasound experience. For each angle tested, the EN received higher visibility ratings. The mean visibility scores for the EN versus the SN were 6.44 vs. 5.52 at 0 degrees (p=0.001), 7.77 vs. 6.96 at 15 degrees (p=0.0004) and 8.33 vs. 7.54 at 30 degrees (p=0.0001). Participants reported significantly greater comfort using the EN needle compared to the SN (p= 0.001). These results held true regardless of the sequence of needle tested first. Also there was a significant difference in visibility scores by angle (p=0.0001). Larger angles (30>15>0) resulted in higher scores. In this in vitro trial, the application of the EN improved needle visibility for users of all levels of experience. Clinical correlation is pending.
    Journal of endourology / Endourological Society 06/2013; DOI:10.1089/end.2013.0292 · 2.10 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Optimum positioning of Peripheral Nerve catheter is vital for successful nerve block. There is incidence of secondary catheter failure in spite of good nerve localization on ultrasound, due to improper positioning around the nerve. One of the main reasons is difficulty to localize the tip of Peripheral nerve catheters in the desired field. We described a novel technique called Pumping maneuver that can really be helpful to achieve this goal. Discussion: One of the main reasons of malposition is difficult to identify the tip of these small peripheral nerve catheters around the nerve. So we used our novel technique called Pumping maneuver in a series of four patients who got ultrasound guided femoral, anterior sciatic, Popliteal and interscalene peripheral nerve catheters for postoperative pain relief to identify the location of the tip of the peripheral nerve catheter using color Doppler. After introduction of the catheter 5 cm beyond the needle tip in the desired field of block, the guide wire was re-introduced in the catheter and was moved back and forth. This movement produced color Doppler effect in the area around the nerve on using ultrasound color Doppler that helped us to identify the tip of peripheral nerve catheter. Postoperatively pain was well controlled in all these patients using continuous infusions with minimum requirement for opioids reflecting successful blocks. Pumping Maneuver Pumping the stylet in and out of a stationary needle shaft increases the echogenicity of the needle shaft and tip, thereby facilitating needle localization. We applied it to the catheters. The increased echogenicity has been attributed to the formation of micro bubbles inside and outside the catheter. It can be achieved using the color Doppler.Conclusion: Confirmation of catheter around the nerve can be difficult to visualize even with USG. Pumping maneuver along with color Doppler can help the user to identify the catheter and achieve successful block. This technique has not been studied before. It is based on our clinical experience, which requires future studies to establish its validity and reproducibility.
    Regional anesthesia and pain medicine 07/2013; 38(July 2013):a234. · 2.12 Impact Factor
Show more