Article

Assessing Intimacy: The Pair Inventory*

Journal of Marital and Family Therapy (Impact Factor: 1.01). 06/2007; 7(1):47 - 60. DOI:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1981.tb01351.x

ABSTRACT PAIR, acronym for Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationships, was developed as a tool for educators, researchers and therapists. PAIR provides systematic information on five types of intimacy: emotional, social, sexual, intellectual and recreational. Individuals, married or unmarried, describe their relationship in terms of how they currently perceive it (perceived) and how they would like it to be (expected). PAIR can be used with couples in marital therapy and enrichment groups.

1 0
 · 
5 Bookmarks
 · 
548 Views
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the present study was to examine the association between pornography use and aspects of socioemotional closeness in a non-clinical sample of 164 males. Participants' actual and ideal socioemotional closeness was measured by the Perceived Interpersonal Closeness Scale (PICS; Popovic et al., 2003) while their pornography use was examined by the Background and Pornography Use Information Questionnaire (Popovic, 2009). Potential effects of these variables on each other as well as various findings concerning pornography consumption and related attitudes are presented. The results showed that there was no significant difference between self-reported pornography users and non-users in terms of specific socioemotional closeness with the most significant adults in their lives (i.e., partners, closest friends, mothers, and fathers). However, pornography users had significantly higher total closeness scores than non-users, showing possibly a craving for intimacy among pornography users versus non-pornography users. This "intimacy motive" and relevant and controversial findings are discussed.
    Archives of Sexual Behavior 04/2011; 40(2):449-56. · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Individuals diagnosed with lung and head and neck (HN) cancers and their spouses are at increased risk for distress. This study assessed whether the way couples communicate about cancer and their perceptions of relationship intimacy influenced both partners' adjustment. One-hundred thirty-nine patients and their spouses [For purposes of clarity, we refer to the patients' intimate partner as the spouse, regardless of actual marital status and we reserve the term partner to refer to the other person in the couple (i.e., the patient's partner is the spouse and the spouse's partner is the patient)] completed measures of spousal communication, intimacy, and distress at three time points over 6 months. Using multilevel modeling, an over-time actor-partner interdependence model was specified that examined whether intimacy mediated associations between one's own and one's partner's reports of communication at baseline and later distress. Patients and spouses who reported greater baseline distress reported more negative baseline communication as well as lower levels of intimacy and greater distress over time. Mediation analyses showed patients' and spouses' reports of positive spousal communication were associated with less subsequent distress largely through their effects on intimacy. Clinicians working with head and neck or lung cancer patients should assess communication and intimacy because both impact couples' distress.
    Journal of Behavioral Medicine 05/2011; 35(3):334-46. · 3.10 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Extensive research has evaluated emotional abilities measures among individuals, but the validity of these constructs in a couples context has yet to be examined despite theoretical perspectives often highlighting the detrimental effects of poor emotional abilities on interpersonal functioning. The current study evaluates four measures of emotional abilities in a sample of 104 couples (emotional intelligence, self-rated alexithymia, partner-rated alexithymia, and couples’ emotional awareness). Results indicate emotional intelligence and alexithymia are significantly associated with mood and relationship functioning of both self and partner. These findings support the utility of brief measures of emotional abilities to inform clinical practice with couples.
    American Journal of Family Therapy 01/2012; 40:189-207. · 0.54 Impact Factor

Mark T. Schaefer