Article

Surgically retrieved spermatozoa versus ejaculated spermatozoa in modified natural IVF-ICSI cycles

OVO Clinic, 8000 boulevard Décarie, Montréal, Québec, Canada H4P 2S4.
Reproductive biomedicine online (Impact Factor: 2.98). 06/2012; 25(3):242-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.06.003
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate the outcome of modified natural IVF-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (mnIVF-ICSI) cycles to compare 81 mnIVF-ICSI first cycles using ejaculated spermatozoa with 44 mnIVF-ICSI first cycles using surgically retrieved spermatozoa. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of number of oocytes retrieved, oocyte maturity or female age. However, male age was significantly higher in the surgically retrieved compared with the ejaculated group (41.5 versus 36.5 years, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in fertilization rate or cleavage rate between the ejaculated and the surgically retrieved groups; however the prevalence of embryo transfer was higher in the surgically retrieved group (65.9% versus 45.7%, P = 0.03). Only single-embryo transfer was performed. Biochemical (34.5% versus 37.8%) and clinical (31.0% versus 35.1%) pregnancy rates per embryo transfer were similar between the ejaculated and the surgically retrieved groups. The data suggest that mnIVF-ICSI is an alternative treatment option in couples with severe male factor infertility where surgical sperm retrieval is required. RBM Online (c) 2012, Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

0 Followers
 · 
179 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess the effect of indomethacin (taken at defined times) on follicular rupture, indexes of intrafollicular blood flow, and steroidogenesis. Six healthy volunteers awaiting treatment for infertility by IVF-ET during subsequent natural cycles. All women were examined (at least every 8 hours) by transvaginal ultrasonography with color Doppler imaging and had samples of blood taken for hormone analysis. A self-test for urinary LH was performed before each scan. Indomethacin was first taken (50 mg three times per day) according to the maximum follicular diameter (first four women) or when the LH dipstick gave a positive result; the drug was taken for > or = 3 days. Follicular rupture was delayed in five of six cases (by 2 to 12 days). There was a reduction in intrafollicular peak systolic velocity before and after the positive urinary LH test compared with historical controls. Three follicles (50% of women) with the highest peak systolic velocity had an hemorrhagic appearance and persisted longer. There was no significant effect on menstrual cycle length or the levels of circulating FSH, E2, LH, or P. Indomethacin administered at the time of a positive self-test for urinary LH can delay follicular rupture with an associated reduction in intrafollicular blood flow but with no apparent effects on hormonal or menstrual status.
    Fertility and Sterility 04/1996; 65(3):556-60. · 4.59 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: When designing a clinical trial to show whether a new or experimental therapy is as effective as a standard therapy (but not necessarily more effective), the usual null hypothesis of equality is inappropriate and leads to logical difficulties. Since therapies cannot be shown to be literally equivalent, the appropriate null hypothesis is that the standard therapy is more effective than the experimental therapy by at least some specified amount. The problem is presented in terms of a trial in which the outcome of interest is dichotomous; test statistics, confidence intervals, and sample size calculations are discussed. The required sample size may be larger for either null hypothesis formulation than for the other, depending on the specific assumptions made. Reporting results in terms of confidence intervals is especially useful for this type of trial.
    Controlled Clinical Trials 01/1983; 3(4):345-53. DOI:10.1016/0197-2456(82)90024-1
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In August 2010, the provincial government of Québec, Canada introduced funding of assisted reproduction treatment through the provincial health programme. Alongside this benefit, legislation was introduced to control assisted reproduction treatment activities in the province, including restrictions on the number of embryos that could be transferred in any one cycle. The aim of the programme was to transfer a single embryo in every cycle; multiple embryos could be transferred under suboptimal conditions but required physician justification. In the first 3 months of this programme, 1353 cycles of IVF were performed in five Québec assisted reproduction centres, with an overall clinical pregnancy rate of 32% per embryo transfer and 50% of transfers used elective single-embryo transfer (eSET). The multiple-pregnancy rate was only 3.7% per clinical pregnancy. In 2009, prior to the introduction of the programme, eSET was used in only 1.6% of embryo transfers, resulting in a multiple-pregnancy rate of 25.6%. These data demonstrate that providing provincially funded assisted reproduction treatment created an environment in which the aggressive use of eSET was not only possible, but also rapidly implemented. The result was a dramatic drop in multiple-pregnancy rates, approaching those for natural pregnancies.
    Reproductive biomedicine online 07/2011; 23(4):500-4. DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.05.020 · 2.98 Impact Factor
Show more