Article

Systematic comparison of tissue fixation with alternative fixatives to conventional tissue fixation with buffered formalin in a xenograft-based model

University of Hohenheim, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany.
Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin (Impact Factor: 2.56). 07/2012; 461(3):259-69. DOI: 10.1007/s00428-012-1248-5
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In our study we systematically compared the alternative fixatives acidified formal alcohol (AFA), PAXgene®, HOPE®, and combinations of AFA or formalin with ultrasound treatment to standard (buffered) formalin fixation. We examined general morphology and detectability of protein structures by immunohistochemistry of the membrane receptors epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R), and phosphorylated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (phospho-HER2). In order to allow for stringent comparability of different fixation techniques, we used matched mouse xenograft tumor samples from three different human cancer cell lines (colon, ovarian, and non-small cell lung cancer), either fixed conventionally with formalin or an alternative fixative. Tissue morphology after fixation with AFA and PAXgene® was comparable to formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue (FFPET) morphology. Ultrasound fixations resulted in slightly inferior morphology and HOPE® fixation preserved morphology only poorly compared to FFPET in this system. None of the tested alternative fixatives enabled immunohistochemical detectability of all three targets in the same manner as FFPET. Pronounced staining was possible for EGFR and IGF-1R with all alternative fixatives but HOPE®, and phospho-HER2 staining was only noteworthy with formalin-ultrasound-fixed tissue. Therefore, the use of alternative fixatives comes with the need for careful validation of obtained IHC results individually for each target.

Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00428-012-1248-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Thorben Nietner, Mar 30, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
128 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Identifying targets for personalized targeted therapy is the pathologist's domain and a treasure. For decades, pathologists have had to learn, understand, adopt and implement many new laboratory techniques as they arrived on the scene. Pathologists successfully integrate the results of those tests into final pathology reports that were, and still are, the basis of clinical therapeutic decisions. The molecular methods are different but no more difficult to comprehend in the era of "kit procedures". In recent years, the development of targeted therapies has influenced routine practices in pathology laboratories because the use of molecular techniques is required to include clinically useful predictive information in the pathology report. Pathologists have the knowledge and expertise to identify particular gene mutations using the appropriate molecular tests currently available. This review focuses on the most important recent developments in KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), and shows that a pathologist is involved in 10 stages of this procedure. Recent studies have shown that highly sensitive, simple, reliable and rapid assays may significantly improve the identification of CRC patients resistant to anti-EGFR therapy. Thus, direct sequencing does not seem to be an optimal procedure of KRAS testing for clinical purposes. Twelve currently available high-sensitivity diagnostic assays (with the CE-IVD mark) for KRAS mutation testing are briefly described and compared. The suggested pathology report content for somatic mutation tests is described. In conclusion, evidence is presented that sending away paraffin blocks with tumor tissue for KRAS mutation testing may not be in the best interest of patients. Instead, an evidence-based approach indicates that KRAS mutation testing should be performed in pathology departments, only with the use of CE-IVD/FDA-approved KRAS tests, and with the obligatory, periodic participation in the KRAS EQA scheme organized by the European Society of Pathology as an independent international body.
    Polish journal of pathology: official journal of the Polish Society of Pathologists 01/2012; 63(3):145-64. DOI:10.5114/pjp.2012.31499 · 0.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent advances in molecular biology and pathology have opened new opportunities for refining our knowledge of pathophysiologic events and biomarkers. Particular interest in applying these novel methods to current and archived tissues collected in experimental and epidemiological/clinical studies is evident. Until now, it has not always been possible to use archived alcohol-fixed paraffin-embedded (AFPE) tissues for immunohistochemisty (IHC), because AFPE slices and blocks were not often amenable to standard IHC methods. In order to solve this problem, we developed a simple method of post-fixation, which allows to use, on AFPE slices, standard IHC protocols already used for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. For the assessment of post-fixation processing and to test the feasibility of IHC, we selected the spleen from Sprague-Dawley rats as a demonstrative tissue. Antibodies to PAX5, CD3, CD68 and Ki-67, were tested on FFPE, AFPE and AFPE post-fixed spleen samples. The specificity of antibodies to bind different epitopes expressed in spleen tissue was maintained in FFPE and AFPE post-fixed sections, according to anatomical localization. Post-fixation of AFPE samples did not affect tissue morphology and IHC results were comparable to the FFPE sections in terms of sensitivity, specificity and intensity of staining. In addition to providing an opportunity to use archived tissues, this new post-fixation method would dramatically reduce the use of formaldehyde during histopathology procedures, thus minimizing worker exposure to this dangerous carcinogenic substance.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diagnostic tests, based on nucleic acid extracts from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues, are now becoming increasingly common due to the introduction of biological agents for cancer therapy. Unfortunately, the formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissues are heterogeneous in terms of processing and tissue type, and this has an impact on downstream molecular techniques, especially RNA-based techniques. The present review deals with most of the variables connected to the extraction of nucleic acids from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues, ranging from tissue processing to quality control of extracts. The most recent peer-reviewed publications (mostly published in the past 5 years) and information provided by company websites have been analyzed to compile this review.
    Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics 04/2013; 13(3):271-82. DOI:10.1586/erm.13.14 · 4.27 Impact Factor
Show more