Current trends in α-helical membrane protein crystallization: an update.

Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, United Kingdom.
Protein Science (Impact Factor: 2.74). 07/2012; 21(9):1358-65. DOI: 10.1002/pro.2122
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT α-Helical membrane proteins (MPs) are the targets for many pharmaceutical drugs and play important roles in human physiology. In recent years, significant progress has been made in determining their atomic structure using X-ray crystallography. However, a major bottleneck in MP crystallography still remains, namely, the identification of conditions that give crystals that are suitable for structural determination. In 2008, we undertook an analysis of the crystallization conditions for 121 α-helical MPs to design a rationalized sparse matrix crystallization screen, MemGold. We now report an updated analysis that includes a further 133 conditions. The results reveal the current trends in α-helical MP crystallization with notable differences since 2008. The updated information has been used to design new crystallization and additive screens that should prove useful for both initial crystallization scouting and subsequent crystal optimization.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this report we highlight the latest trends in phasing methods used to solve alpha helical membrane protein structures and analyze the use of heavy atom metals for the purpose of experimental phasing. Our results reveal that molecular replacement is emerging as the most successful method for phasing alpha helical membrane proteins, with the notable exception of the transporter family, where experimentally derived phase information still remains the most effective method. To facilitate selection of heavy atoms salts for experimental phasing an analysis of these was undertaken and indicates that organic mercury salts are still the most successful heavy atoms reagents. Interestingly the use of seleno-L-methionine incorporated protein has increased since earlier studies into membrane protein phasing, so too the use of SAD and MAD as techniques for phase determination. Taken together this study provides a brief snapshot of phasing methods for alpha helical membrane proteins and suggests possible routes for heavy atom selection and phasing methods based on currently available data.
    Protein Science 08/2013; · 2.74 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As we appreciate the importance of stabilising membrane proteins, the barriers towards their structure determination are being broken down. This change in mindset comes hand-in-hand with more effort placed on developing methods focused at screening for membrane proteins which are naturally stable in detergent solution or improving those that are not so. In practice, however, it is not easy to decide the best strategy to monitor and improve detergent stability, requiring a decision-making process that can be even more difficult for those new to the field. In this review we outline the importance of membrane protein stability with discussions of the stabilisation strategies applied in context with the use of crystallisation scaffolds and the different types of crystallisation methods themselves. Where possible we also highlight areas that we think could push this field forward with emerging technologies, such as X-ray free electron lasers (X-feL), which could have a big impact on the membrane protein structural biology community. We hope this review will serve as a useful guide for those striving to solve structures of both pro- and eukaryotic membrane proteins.
    The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology 01/2013; · 4.89 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Protein crystallization is known since 1840 and can be straightforward but in most cases constitutes a real bottleneck. This stimulated the birth of the biocrystallogenesis field with both 'practical' and 'basic' science aims. In the early time of biochemistry, crystallization was a tool for the preparation of biological substances. Today biocrystallogenesis aims to provide efficient methods for crystal fabrication and means to optimize crystal quality for X-ray crystallography. The historical development of crystallization methods for structural biology occurred first in conjunction with that of biochemical and genetic methods for macromolecule production, then with the development of structure determination methodologies, and recently with the routine access to synchrotron X-ray sources. In the past the finding of conditions sustaining crystal growth occurred mostly empirically but in the last decades is moving progressively towards more rationality as a result of a deeper understanding of the physical-chemistry of protein crystal growth and the use of idea-driven screening and high-throughput procedures. Protein and nucleic acid engineering procedures to facilitate crystallization as well as crystallization methods in gelled-media or by counter-diffusion are recent important achievements, although the underlying concepts are old. The new nano-technologies brought significant improvement in the practice of protein crystallization. Today, the increasing number of crystal structures deposited in Protein Data Banks, could mean that crystallization no more is a bottleneck. This is not the case, since structural biology projects become more challenging and thereby require adapted methods to grow the appropriate crystals, notably of macromolecular assemblages. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    FEBS Journal 10/2013; · 4.25 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Oct 24, 2014