Article

Cardiovascular effects of GLP-1 and GLP-1-based therapies: implications for the cardiovascular continuum in diabetes?

Department of Internal Medicine I-Cardiology, University Hospital Aachen, RWTH Aachen, Germany.
Diabetic Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.24). 07/2012; DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03746.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Aims:  Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and inhibitors of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 that increase glucagon-like peptide-1 plasma concentrations are current treatment options for patients with diabetes mellitus. As patients with diabetes are a high-risk population for the development of a severe and diffuse atherosclerosis, we aim to review the potential action of these drugs on cardiovascular disease and to summarize the potential role of present glucagon-like peptide-1-based therapies from a cardiologist's point of view. Methods:  Using a PubMed/MEDLINE search without language restriction, studies were identified and evaluated in order to review the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1-based therapy on different stages of the cardiovascular continuum. Results:  Recent experimental as well as clinical data suggest that dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists-in addition to their metabolic effects-may have beneficial effects on the cardiovascular continuum at multiple stages, including: (1) cardiovascular risk factors; (2) molecular mechanisms involved in atherogenesis; (3) ischaemic heart disease; and (4) heart failure. Furthermore, retrospective analysis suggested decreased cardiovascular events in patients with glucagon-like peptide-1-based therapies. Conclusion:  There are ample data to suggest beneficial effects of glucagon-like peptide-1-based therapies on the cardiovascular continuum and large-scale clinical trials are warranted to determine whether these effects translate into improved cardiovascular endpoints in humans. © 2012 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine © 2012 Diabetes UK.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
73 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Liraglutide, a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analog, has several non- glycemic properties, but its effect on carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), a recognized marker of subclinical atherosclerosis, is still unknown. A prospective study of 8 months duration in 64 patients with type-2 diabetes and no prior history of coronary artery disease evaluated whether adding liraglutide to metformin affects carotid IMT, measured by color doppler ultrasound. After 8 months, fasting glucose decreased by 2.1 mmol/l and HbA1c by 1.9% (p < 0.01 for all). Liraglutide reduced total-cholesterol and triglycerides by 10%, and LDL-cholesterol by 19%, whereas HDL-cholesterol increased by 18% (p < 0.01 for all lipid changes). Carotid IMT decreased from 1.19 +/- 0.47 to 0.94 +/- 0.21 mm (p < 0.01). Yet, changes in carotid IMT did not correlate with changes in any other variable studied. Liraglutide decreases carotid IMT after 8 months treatment independently of its effect on plasma glucose and lipids concentrations.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01715428.
    Cardiovascular Diabetology 02/2014; 13(1):49. · 4.21 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sitagliptin (Januvia(®), Xelevia™, Glactiv(®), Tesavel(®)) is an orally administered, potent and highly selective inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) and was the first agent of its class to be approved for use in the management of adults with type 2 diabetes. Numerous randomized placebo- or active comparator-controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of sitagliptin in terms of improving glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, including its use as monotherapy, initial combination therapy (usually with fixed-dose combinations of sitagliptin/metformin), or add-on therapy to metformin or to other antihyperglycaemic drugs, with or without metformin. The primary endpoint of the clinical trials was the reduction from baseline in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), although sitagliptin also showed beneficial effects for other endpoints, such as the proportion of patients who achieved target HbA1c, and reductions from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels and 2-h postprandial glucose (PPG) levels. Sitagliptin was generally well tolerated in clinical trials, had a low risk of hypoglycaemia (although this depends on background therapy) and had a neutral effect on body weight. Despite concerns regarding a possible increased risk of rare pancreatic adverse events (e.g. pancreatitis) with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-based therapies, such as GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors, no causal association has been found; regulators in Europe recently conducted a review of available data, concluding that there is little evidence that these drugs could cause pancreatic inflammation or pancreatic cancer. A similar review is planned in the USA and postmarketing surveillance will continue. Thus, oral sitagliptin is an effective and generally well tolerated treatment option for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Drugs 01/2014; · 4.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Incretin-based therapy became recently available as antihyperglycemic treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Incretin therapy comprises glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4-I): these classes of drugs not only have the ability to reduce blood glucose, but also can exert several cardioprotective effects. They have been shown to positively influence some risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), to improve endothelial function, and to directly affect cardiac function. For these reasons incretins are considered not only antidiabetic drugs, but also cardiovascular effective. The first clinical trials aimed to demonstrate the safety of DPP4 inhibitors have been recently published: their clinical significance will be discussed in light of the prior experimental findings.
    Current Diabetes Reports 05/2014; 14(5):483. · 3.17 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
0 Downloads