Article

Cosmic Ray Composition and Energy Spectrum from 1-30 PeV Using the40-String Configuration of IceTop and IceCube

Astroparticle Physics (Impact Factor: 4.45). 02/2013; 42:15-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.11.003
Source: arXiv

ABSTRACT The mass composition of high energy cosmic rays depends on their production,
acceleration, and propagation. The study of cosmic ray composition can
therefore reveal hints of the origin of these particles. At the South Pole, the
IceCube Neutrino Observatory is capable of measuring two components of cosmic
ray air showers in coincidence: the electromagnetic component at high altitude
(2835 m) using the IceTop surface array, and the muonic component above ~1 TeV
using the IceCube array. This unique detector arrangement provides an
opportunity for precision measurements of the cosmic ray energy spectrum and
composition in the region of the knee and beyond. We present the results of a
neural network analysis technique to study the cosmic ray composition and the
energy spectrum from 1 PeV to 30 PeV using data recorded using the
40-string/40-station configuration of the IceCube Neutrino Observatory.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Samvel Ter-Antonyan, Aug 28, 2015
2 Followers
 · 
241 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The IceCube Observatory at the South Pole is composed of a cubic kilometer scale neutrino telescope buried beneath the icecap and a square-kilometer surface water Cherenkov tank detector array known as IceTop. The combination of the surface array with the in-ice detector allows the dominantly electromagnetic signal of air showers at the surface and their high-energy muon signal in the ice to be measured in coincidence. This ratio is known to carry information about the nuclear composition of the primary cosmic rays. This paper reviews the recent results from cosmic-ray measurements performed with IceTop/IceCube: energy spectrum, mass composition, anisotropy, search for PeV gamma sources, detection of high energy muons to probe the initial stages of the air shower development, and study of transient events using IceTop in scaler mode.
    Modern Physics Letters A 10/2012; 27(39). DOI:10.1142/S0217732312300388 · 1.34 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Analysis of cosmic ray surface data collected with the IceTop array of Cherenkov detectors at the South Pole provides an accurate measurement of the cosmic ray spectrum and its features in the "knee" region up to energies of about 1 EeV. IceTop is part of the IceCube Observatory that includes a deep-ice cubic kilometer detector that registers signals of penetrating muons and other particles. Surface and in-ice signals detected in coincidence provide clear insights into the nuclear composition of cosmic rays. IceCube already measured an increase of the average primary mass as a function of energy. We present preliminary results on both IceTop-only and coincident event analyses. Furthermore, we review the recent measurement of the cosmic ray anisotropy with IceCube.
    Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment 07/2013; 742. DOI:10.1016/j.nima.2013.10.069 · 1.32 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We report on the measurement of the all-particle cosmic ray energy spectrum with the IceTop air shower array in the energy range from 1.58 PeV to 1.26 EeV. The IceTop air shower array is the surface component of the IceCube Neutrino Observatory at the geographical South Pole. The analysis was performed using only information from IceTop. The data used in this work were taken from June 1, 2010 to May 13, 2011. During that period the IceTop array consisted of 73 stations, compared to 81 in its final configuration. The measured spectrum exhibits a clear deviation from a single power law above the knee around 4 PeV and below 1 EeV. We observe spectral hardening around 18 PeV and steepening around 130 PeV.
    Physical Review D 08/2013; 88(4):042004. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.042004 · 4.86 Impact Factor
Show more