Article

Characteristics of the swallowing sounds recorded in the ear, nose and on trachea.

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Medical & Biological Engineering (Impact Factor: 1.76). 07/2012; 50(8):885-90. DOI: 10.1007/s11517-012-0938-0
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The various malfunctions and difficulties of the swallowing mechanism necessitate various diagnostic techniques to address those problems. Swallowing sounds recorded from the trachea have been suggested as a noninvasive method of swallowing assessment. However, acquiring signals from the trachea can be difficult for those with loose skin. The objective of this pilot study was to explore the viability of using the ear and nose as alternative recording locations for recording swallowing sounds. We recorded the swallowing and breathing sounds of five healthy young individuals from the ear, nose and trachea, simultaneously. We computed time-frequency features and compared them for the different locations of recording. The features included the peak and the maximum frequencies of the power spectrum density, average power at different frequency bands and the wavelet coefficients. The average power calculated over the 4 octave bands between 150 and 2,400 Hz showed a consistent trend with less than 20 dB difference for the breath sounds of all the recording locations. Thus, analyzing breath sounds recorded from the ear and nose for the purpose of aspiration detection would give similar results to those from tracheal recordings; thus, ear and nose recording may be a viable alternative when tracheal recording is not possible.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
98 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The use of cervical auscultation in the evaluation of the pharyngeal swallow may become a part of the clinical evaluation of dysphagic patients. Though its use is based on subjective evaluation, an acoustic analysis of swallowing sounds might establish more objective criteria in the detection of swallowing disorders. The present study sought to investigate three aspects of the methodology for detecting swallowing sounds: (1) the type of acoustic detector unit suited to an acoustic analysis of the pharyngeal swallow, (2) the type of adhesive suited for the attachement of the detector, and (3) the optimal site for sound detection of the pharyngeal swallow. An accelerometer with double-sided paper tape was selected as the appropriate detector unit because of its wide range of frequency response and small attenuation level. Using this detector unit, swallowing sounds and noise associated with simulated laryngeal elevation and the carotid pulse were acquired at 24 sites on the neck in 14 normal subjects; these signals were acoustically analyzed. The determination of the optimal site for detecting swallowing sounds was based on the signal-to-noise ratio. The site over the lateral border of the trachea immediately inferior to the cricoid cartilage is the optimal site for detection of swallowing sounds because this site showed the greatest signal-to-noise ratio with the smallest variance. The site over the center of the cricoid cartilage and the midpoint between the site over the center of the cricoid cartilage and the site immediately superior to the jugular notch were also considered to be the most appropriate sites.
    Dysphagia 11/1994; 9(1):54-62. · 1.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: With the advent of totally implantable hearing aids, the question of the impact of the choice of implantation site on microphone function has yet to be fully addressed. We investigated the effects of skin thickness on microphone function over a 2-week period in a porcine model. Sound attenuation was found to be directly proportional to skin thickness within the range of 0.5 to 3.0 mm. A decrease in resonant frequency of 500 Hz was noted after implantation under a skin thickness of 3.0 mm. The general shape of the frequency response curves was maintained across all thicknesses tested. Attenuation (dB loss) across the range of 500 to 8,000 Hz appeared to be linear over the various skin thicknesses measured, with a regression coefficient (r = .99 at 1 kHz and r = .99 at 3 kHz). To minimize attenuation and exploit the sound-collecting qualities of the external ear, the deep meatal skin appears to be a favorable position for implantation.
    American Journal of Otolaryngology 01/1990; 11(1):1-4. · 1.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several clinical and ambulatory settings necessitate respiratory monitoring without a mouthpiece or facemask. Several studies have demonstrated the utility of breathing sound measurements performed on the chest or neck to detect airflow. However, there are limitations to skin surface measurements, including susceptibility to external noise and transducer motion. Thus, this two-part study investigated a novel location for breathing sound measurements: the external ear. The first study investigated characteristics of sound transmission from the oropharynx to the external ear in 19 adults (nine males). Broadband noise was directed into the oropharynx through a tube and mouthpiece and measured indirectly via an accelerometer affixed to the cheek. Resultant transmission to the external ear was measured with a microphone inserted into an earplug that provided acoustic isolation from ambient noise. Near-unity coherence estimates (> 0.9) between the sounds recorded at the external ear and the oropharynx were observed up to approximately 800 Hz, indicating a low-frequency region of preferred transmission. In the second study, each of 20 subjects (nine males) breathed through a pneumotachograph at targeted shallow (3.0 mL/s/kg) and tidal (7.5 mL/s/kg) flows normalized to body mass, and the resulting sounds were recorded at the external ear. Recordings during breath hold measured background noise. Shallow and tidal expiratory flows, respectively, produced signal-plus-noise-to-noise [(S + N)/N] ratios of 6.7 +/- 4.1 dB and 14.0 +/- 5.3 dB (mean +/- standard deviation) across all subjects between 150 and 300 Hz. Concurrent inspiration demonstrated (S + N)/N ratios of 6.6 +/- 3.9 dB and 14.9 +/- 6.3 dB. Thus, the external ear shows promise as an anatomic site to detect and monitor breathing in a relatively noninvasive and unobtrusive manner.
    IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 01/2005; 51(12):2089-96. · 2.35 Impact Factor