Article

Association between helmets and facial injury after a motorcycle collision: an analysis of more than 40 000 patients from the National Trauma Data Bank.

Department of Surgery, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill.: 1960) (Impact Factor: 4.32). 07/2012; 147(7):674-6. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.894
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Motorcycle collisions are increasing at a precipitous rate, and reliable and valid data regarding all aspects of helmet safety are needed to better inform ongoing debates on mandatory helmet laws. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of motorcycle helmets on the likelihood of a facial injury after motorcycle collisions, using data from the National Trauma Data Bank, version 7.0, on 46 362 patients from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2006. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze the independent association between helmets and facial injury with adjustment for potential confounders. Helmeted motorcyclists were less likely to suffer facial injuries after a motorcycle collision, with a lower adjusted odds ratio of facial injury (0.40; 95% CI, 0.37-0.43) and a lower prevalence of specific types of facial injury compared with their nonhelmeted counterparts.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
186 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The natural history and epidemiological aspects of traumatic vertebral artery dissection (VAD) are not fully understood. We determined the prevalence of VAD and impact on outcome of patients with head and neck trauma. All the patients who were admitted with traumatic brain injury or head and neck trauma were identified by ICD-9-CM codes from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), using data files from 2009 to 2010. NTDB represents one of the largest trauma databases and contains data from over 900 trauma centers across the United States. Presence of VAD was identified in these patients by using ICD-9-CM codes. Admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, injury severity score (ISS), in-hospital complications, and treatment outcome were compared between patients with and without VAD. A total of 84 VAD patients were identified which comprised 0.01 % of all patients admitted with head and neck trauma. The mean age (in years) for patients with VAD was significantly higher than patients without dissection [46 (95 % CI 41-50) vs. 41.3 (95 % CI 41.2-41.4); p = 0.003]. The proportion of patients presenting with GCS score <9 was significantly higher in patients with VAD (31 vs. 12 %, p < 0.0001). The rate of cervical vertebral fracture was significantly higher in patients with VAD (71 vs. 11 %, p < 0.0001). Patients with VAD had higher rates of in-hospital stroke than patients without dissection (5 vs. 0.2 %, p < 0.0001). Numbers of ICU days, ventilator days, and hospital length of stays were all significantly higher in patients with VAD. These differences remained significant after adjusting for the demographics, admission GCS score, and ISS (p < 0.0001). A total of 7 % (N = 6) of the patients with VAD received endovascular treatment and there was no in-hospital stroke in these patients. Patients with VAD had a higher chance of discharge to nursing facilities in comparison to head trauma patients without VAD (OR: 2.1; 95 % CI 1.4-3.5; p < 0.0001). Although infrequent, VAD in head and neck trauma is associated with higher rates of in-hospital stroke and longer length of ICU stay and total hospital stay. Early diagnosis and endovascular treatment may be an alternative option to reduce the rate of in-hospital stroke in these patients.
    Neurocritical Care 02/2014; · 3.04 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Here we describe the Systematically Tabulated Outcomes Research Matrix (STORM) method to generate research questions from pre-existing databases with the aim of improving patient outcomes. STORM can be applied to a database by tabulating its variables into a matrix of independent variables (y-axis) and dependent variables (x-axis) and then applying each unique pairing of an independent and dependent variable to a patient population to generate potentially meaningful research questions. To demonstrate this methodology and establish proof-of-principle, STORM was applied on a small scale to the National Trauma Data Bank and generated at least seven clinically meaningful research questions. When coupled with rigorous clinical judgment, the STORM approach complements the traditional method of hypothesis formation and can be generalized to outcomes research using registry databases across different medical specialties.
    Surgery 10/2013; · 3.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Previous studies of motorcycle crash (MC) related hospital charges use trauma registries and hospital records, and do not adjust for the number of motorcyclists not requiring medical attention. This may lead to conservative estimates of helmet use effectiveness. MC records were probabilistically linked with emergency department and hospital records to obtain total hospital charges. Missing data were imputed. Multivariable quantile regression estimated reductions in hospital charges associated with helmet use and other crash factors. Motorcycle helmets were associated with reduced median hospital charges of $256 (42% reduction) and reduced 98th percentile of $32 390 (33% reduction). After adjusting for other factors, helmets were associated with reductions in charges in all upper percentiles studied. Quantile regression models described homogenous and heterogeneous associations between other crash factors and charges. Quantile regression comprehensively describes associations between crash factors and hospital charges. Helmet use among motorcyclists is associated with decreased hospital charges.
    Injury Prevention 10/2013; · 1.94 Impact Factor