Article

Endosonographic large-bore biopsy of gastric subepithelial tumors: a prospective multicenter study.

aDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, German Clinic for Diagnostics, Wiesbaden bDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Klinikum Märkisch Oderland, Wriezen cDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Central Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, Charité Campus Virchow dDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Maria Heimsuchung Caritas-Klinik eDepartment of Pathology, Charité Campus Mitte, Berlin fDepartment of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology (Impact Factor: 1.66). 07/2012; 24(10):1135-1144. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328356eae2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Once gastric subepithelial lesions (SEL) are found, tissue diagnosis is required, considering the possible differential diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Previous studies have shown insufficient accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) using cytologic analysis. METHODS: The feasibility and yield of EUS-FNA-based histologic tissue acquisition for gastric SEL, using 19 G large-bore needles, was assessed in a 4-year multicenter, prospective study. All consecutive patients, who were referred for EUS-FNA for all SEL greater than 1 cm, were included. RESULTS: Of 100 patients with suspected gastric SEL, 71 lesions were found to be eligible. Endoscopic biopsies or resections or surgery were used alternatively for a variety of reasons in 25 patients. EUS-FNA using the 19 G needle was finally performed in 46/71 cases (65%) with one to four needle passes. Sufficient material for a definite or a suspected histological diagnosis was obtained in 52 and 7% of the cases, respectively. In 41%, the samples were not informative. Immunohistochemistry was possible in 91% of cases with sufficient amounts of tissue; 30% were GIST. Self-limited, mild hemorrhage occurred in 22%; one patient developed a fatal abscess. CONCLUSION: Even when intended, EUS-guided 19 G FNA is only feasible in 46% of gastric SEL. The diagnostic yield of 19 G FNA was only 52%, but with excellent differentiation between GIST and leiomyoma. Infectious complications must be prevented.

1 Bookmark
 · 
123 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: First attempts to combine flexible endoscopy and ultrasound within one method have been initiated in 1978. 35 years later endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has developed into a fascinating interdisciplinary diagnostic and interventional tool. A progressively increasing number of scientific papers in the field of EUS has been published – more than 700 in one year. Moreover, the scientific and methodical quality of EUS related publications has improved substantially in the last decade. EUS is accepted as an implement of modern clinical practice. Based on convincing scientific levels of evidence the method has been included in guidelines of several medical societies. Recent advances in EUS technology, such as contrast enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CE-EUS) and realtime elastography (RTE) show potential to even improve further the accuracy of EUS for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic and gastrointestinal lesions and for the staging of gastrointestinal and pulmonary malignancies. Based on a systematic analysis of recent publications the most important issues and developments in diagnostic EUS and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUSFNA) are discussed.
    Endoskopie heute 03/2013; 26(1):13-29. · 0.16 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Management of subepithelial tumors (SETs) remains challenging. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has improved differential diagnosis of these tumors but a definitive diagnosis on EUS findings alone can be achieved in the minority of cases. Complete endoscopic resection may provide a reasonable approach for tissue acquisition and may also be therapeutic in case of malignant lesions. Small SET restricted to the submucosa can be removed with established basic resection techniques. However, resection of SET arising from deeper layers of the gastrointestinal wall requires advanced endoscopic methods and harbours the risk of perforation. Innovative techniques such as submucosal tunneling and full thickness resection have expanded the frontiers of endoscopic therapy in the past years. This review will give an overview about endoscopic resection techniques of SET with a focus on novel methods.
    World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy. 12/2014; 6(12):592-9.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The forward-viewing linear echoendoscope (FV-EUS) has been developed with the aim of overcoming limitations of standard curved linear-array echoendoscopes (CLA-EUS) and to further expand interventional applications of EUS. The main characteristic of the FV-EUS is a shifting in the orientation of both endoscopic and ultrasound views from oblique to forward, with the exit of the working channel at the tip of the instrument. This allows exit of the devices parallel to the longitudinal axis of the endoscope, thus resulting in a more direct and stable access to the lesion while increasing the precision and force applied to the target. Accumulating evidence has shown that the FV-EUS can be used instead of the standard CLA-EUS scope for routine fine needle aspiration, with extremely good performance for subepithelial lesions and for difficult to reach locations. Several areas of use of this echoendoscope are yet to be better defined, such as its potential for therapeutic and interventional procedures, as well as for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. The current report provides an updated overview of the available evidence for both diagnostic and interventional uses of the FV-EUS.
    Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences. 11/2014;