Laboratory of Sport Biomechanics, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, BRAZIL.
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (Impact Factor: 1.86). 07/2012; 27(5). DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318265a3c8
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Assessment of lower extremity bilateral asymmetries in soccer players is important for both injury prevention and performance. The purpose of this investigation was to compare isokinetic knee extensor assessment of asymmetry with a more specific countermovement jump (CMJ). Forty-six male Brazilian professional soccer players participated in this study. The maximal power, maximal force and impulse were determined during CMJ as well as the total work and peak torque at 60/s, 180/s and 300/s during isokinetic leg extension, separately for each leg. Factor analysis was performed for all investigated variables, and the diagnostic concordance between different criteria was analyzed by McNemar's Chi test. The factor analysis showed that the isokinetic and CMJ tests were widely independent methods for the assessment of bilateral differences. Concordance of the diagnostic information could only be found between the maximal force during CMJ and the total work and peak torque at 180°/s and 300/s during isokinetic leg extension. Impulse and maximal power during countermovement jump on a double force platform appear to be appropriate additional variables for the identification of bilateral differences. Therefore, it might be pertinent to perform, in addition to isokinetic assessment, a vertical jump test on a force platform to assure widespread and reliable diagnostic information.


Available from: Hans-Joachim Menzel, Jun 09, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Compare the ability of commonly used comparison models to detect neuromuscular asymmetries. A secondary purpose was to determine which neuromuscular task(s) has the greatest sensitivity to identify asymmetries based on the ASI (asymmetry index) calculation.
    Physical Therapy in Sport 02/2015; In Press. DOI:10.1016/j.ptsp.2015.01.003 · 1.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Although the reliability of isokinetic strength tests of knee flexors (flex) and extensors (ext) has been examined several times, statistical evidence about the influence of internal and external factors is missing. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine the impact of familiarisation, muscle group, contraction mode, angular velocity and test parameters on the reproducibility of findings derived from an isokinetic dynamometer (IsoMed 2000). METHODS: Thirty-three male subjects (mean age: 22.3 years) with no prior experience of isokinetic exercise participated in three identical test sessions (T1, T2, T3), each separated by 48–72 h. Peak moment (PM), angle of peak moment (APM) and contractional work (CW) were determined unilaterally (left and right) during maximum concentric (con) and eccentric (ecc) knee flexion (abdominal position) and extension (supine position) at 30, 90 and 150°/s, respectively. An ANOVA with repeated measures confirmed systematic bias. Reproducibility of consecutive tests (T1–T2, T2–T3) was assessed by calculating the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC 2,1) (relative reliability) as well as the standard error of measurement (SEM) (absolute reliability). ICC values were averaged according to respective factors (Fisher’s z-transformation) and tested for significant differences by Steiger’s formulas. RESULTS: PM and CW demonstrated a high absolute reliability (SEM: 4.7–10.5%). Relative reproducibility varied considerably (p > 0.05) between muscles (ecc flex > ecc ext), contraction modes (con ext > ecc ext) and test parameters (PM = CW > APM), but did not depend on angular velocity (30 = 90 = 150°/s). Due to familiarisation the reliability of PM obtained from eccentric knee extensions significantly increased (T2–T3 > T1–T2). CONCLUSIONS: These results improve the development and execution of reliable isokinetic strength testing protocols for unilateral knee flexion and extension together with the interpretation of different test parameters.
    Isokinetics and exercise science 12/2014; 22(4):333-342. DOI:10.3233/IES-140555 · 0.35 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Most healthy humans move symmetrically at gross limb level but large kinetic and kinematic asymmetries have been observed at joint level during locomotion. The aim of this study was to assess muscle function asymmetries in healthy, active adults using an adapted force sledge apparatus which isolates the plantarflexors during a stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) task. Peak force, rate of force development and SSC function of preferred and non-preferred limbs were assessed in 21 healthy, active individuals using the adapted sledge and three-dimensional motion analysis. Between-limb differences and relationships were determined using paired t-tests/Wilcoxon Signed-rank test, Cohen's dz, absolute symmetry index and Pearson's r/Spearman's rho. Significant differences with moderate effect size (ES) were observed in peak force (ES: 0.66), rate of peak force development (ES: 0.78), rate of force development in the first 50 ms (ES: 0.76), flight time (ES: 0.64) and SSC function (0.68), with no difference in contact time or duration of eccentric loading. A small ES (0.56) was observed in rate of force development in the first 30 ms. The upper range of asymmetry observed (up to 44.6%) was larger than previously reported for healthy individuals, indicating compensations occur at proximal joints during locomotion to ensure symmetrical movement.
    Laterality 05/2015; 20(2):128-140. DOI:10.1080/1357650X.2014.921688 · 1.13 Impact Factor