Article

Healthcare workers role in keeping MMR vaccination uptake high in Europe: a review of evidence.

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eurosurveillance: bulletin europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin (Impact Factor: 4.66). 01/2012; 17(26).
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Measles is a highly contagious and potentially fatal disease. Europe is far from the 95% coverage rates necessary for elimination of the disease, although a safe and cost-effective vaccine is available. We reviewed the literature on studies carried out in European countries from January 1991 to September 2011 on knowledge, attitudes and practices of health professionals towards measles vaccination and on how health professionals have an impact on parental vaccination choices. Both quantitative and qualitative studies were considered: a total of 28 eligible articles were retrieved. Healthcare workers are considered by parents as a primary and trustworthy source of information on childhood vaccination. Gaps in knowledge and poor communication from healthcare workers are detrimental to high immunisation rates. Correct and transparent information for parents plays a key role in parental decisions on whether to have their children vaccinated. Healthcare workers' knowledge of and positive attitudes towards measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination are crucial to meeting the measles elimination goal. An effort should be made to overcome potential communication barriers and to strengthen vaccine education among healthcare professionals.

0 Followers
 · 
83 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In January-March 2013 in England, confirmed measles cases increased in children aged 10-16 years. In April-September 2013, the National Health System and Public Health England launched a national measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) campaign based on data from Child Health Information Systems (CHIS) estimating that approximately 8% in this age group were unvaccinated. We estimated coverage at baseline, and, of those unvaccinated (target), the proportion vaccinated up to 20/08/2013 (mid-point) to inform further public health action. We selected a sample of 6644 children aged 10-16 years using multistage sampling from those reported unvaccinated in CHIS at baseline and validated their records against GP records. We adjusted the CHIS MMR vaccine coverage estimates correcting by the proportion of vaccinated children obtained through sample validation. We validated 5179/6644 (78%) of the sample records. Coverage at baseline was estimated as 94.7% (95% confidence intervals, CI: 93.5-96.0%), lower in London (86.9%, 95%CI: 83.0-90.9%) than outside (96.1%, 95%CI 95.5-96.8%). The campaign reached 10.8% (95%CI: 7.0-14.6%) of the target population, lower in London (7.1%, 95%CI: 4.9-9.3) than in the rest of England (11.4%, 95%CI: 7.0-15.9%). Coverage increased by 0.5% up to 95.3% (95% CI: 94.1-96.4%) but an estimated 210,000 10-16 year old children remained unvaccinated nationally. Baseline MMR coverage was higher than previously reported and was estimated to have reached the 95% campaign objective at midpoint. Eleven per cent of the target population were vaccinated during the campaign, and may be underestimated, especially in London. No further national campaigns are needed but targeted local vaccination activities should be considered.
    Vaccine 07/2014; 32(36). DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.05.077 · 3.49 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Measles outbreaks occur regularly throughout Europe, up to 31500 cases in the previous year, particularly where there are pockets of populations with lower vaccination coverage than the recommended ≥95%. Anthroposophic communities in Europe are one of several groups with relatively low vaccination coverage. In Sweden, outbreaks of measles and rubella were reported from an anthroposophic community. Thus the aim of this qualitative study was to explore facilitators and barriers to MMR vaccination among parents living in anthroposophic communities in Sweden. Twenty parents living in an anthroposophic community were interviewed, focusing on their views and decisions on MMR vaccination. The interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Two overarching views of health emerged, differentiating broadly parents who vaccinate vs. parents who do not vaccinate. Four themes describing parental attitudes toward measles vaccination were developed and three of these, the conformers, the pragmatists and the attentive delayers describe different approaches toward vaccinations among those who actually vaccinate. The last theme, promoters of natural immunity, represents those postponing or refusing vaccination beyond childhood. This study suggests that there is a spectrum of parental beliefs regarding MMR vaccination in this anthroposophic community. Interventions specifically targeted to the anthroposophic community and strengthening health workers capacity for a constructive dialog on vaccine's benefit and risks may contribute to higher vaccination coverage. This is believed to minimize the risk of future epidemics and contribute to the WHO European Region's goal of eliminating measles. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Vaccine 11/2014; 32(50):6752-7. DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.10.011 · 3.49 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectifs Des mesures préventives ont été mises en place dans les armées françaises pour limiter l’impact de l’épidémie de rougeole survenue en 2010–2011. L’objectif de l’étude était d’obtenir un retour d’expérience de la gestion de cet épisode par les médecins généralistes (MG) militaires. Méthode Une étude transversale a été conduite auprès des MG exerçant dans les unités militaires de France métropolitaine. Les 60 unités qui avaient déclaré au moins un cas de rougeole à la surveillance épidémiologique des armées ont été incluses. Les données étaient recueillies à l’aide d’un questionnaire anonyme. Résultats Les mesures préventives mises en place contre la rougeole étaient bien acceptées (« totalement justifiées pour 77,8 %) et la plupart des MG considéraient que la gestion de l’épidémie n’avait eu que peu d’impact sur l’activité de leur service médical. La gestion des cas était perçue comme relativement simple mais des difficultés ont été rencontrées dans l’identification des sujets contacts autour des cas (48,1 % des répondants) et dans l’identification des sujets à vacciner parmi ces contacts (plus de 80 % des MG rapportant des difficultés de recueil des antécédents de rougeole et du statut vaccinal). L’organisation de la vaccination était aussi perçue comme difficile. Conclusions Les mesures préventives mises en place autour des cas de rougeole apparaissaient bien acceptées par les MG militaires, ce qui pourrait refléter leur bonne préparation face à l’épidémie. Cependant, la vaccination semblait mal comprise et acceptée par les patients, ce qui souligne le rôle essentiel du MG dans l’information des patients. Les difficultés de recueil des antécédents de rougeole et du statut vaccinal pourraient être contournées par une retranscription précoce, dès l’incorporation des militaires, des données du carnet de santé dans le dossier médical. Une utilisation accrue des tests salivaires de détection, qui s’affranchissent de la chaîne du froid, simplifierait enfin la démarche diagnostique en milieu militaire.
    Revue d Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique 04/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.respe.2013.11.075 · 0.66 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
14 Downloads
Available from
May 26, 2014