Class II Composite Restorations and Proximal Concavities: Clinical Management of Proximal Concavities.

Operative Dentistry (Impact Factor: 1.67). 07/2012; 38(2). DOI: 10.2341/11-224-T
Source: PubMed


SUMMARY Clinical experience supports the notion that the restoration of MOD cavities may pose a challenge to the practitioner. Proper placement of precontoured matrices and commercial wedges help the clinician to establish an optimal emergence profile and sufficient contours. However, the presence of proximal concavities in premolars or molars can turn the reproduction of previous cervical architecture into an even more demanding task. Wedges with customized form or adequate design can precisely conform the matrix to the cavosurface area and prevent any gap formation. This article presents two different options that allow for successful and predictable reestablishing of anatomically correct contours and optimal proximal contacts in posterior teeth with proximal concavities.

Download full-text


Available from: Michael Patras, May 29, 2014
128 Reads
  • Source
    International Dental Journal 06/2001; 51(3):117-58. DOI:10.1002/j.1875-595X.2001.tb00832.x · 1.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: About 35 years ago, Ryge provided a practical approach to evaluation of clinical performance of restorative materials. This systematic approach was soon universally accepted. While that methodology has served us well, a large number of scientific methodologies and more detailed questions have arisen that require more rigor. Current restorative materials have vastly improved clinical performance and any changes over time are not easily detected by the limited sensitivity of the Ryge criteria in short term clinical investigations. However, the clinical evaluation of restorations not only involves the restorative material per se but also different operative techniques. For instance, a composite resin may show good longevity data when applied in conventional cavities but not in modified operative approaches. Insensitivity, combined with the continually evolving and non-standard investigator modifications of the categories, scales, and reporting methods, has created a body of literature that is extremely difficult to meaningfully interpret. In many cases, the insensitivity of the original Ryge methods is misinterpreted as good clinical performance. While there are many good features of the original system, it is now time to move to a more contemporary one. The current review approaches this challenge in two ways: (1) a proposal for a modern clinical testing protocol for controlled clinical trials, and (2) an in-depth discussion of relevant clinical evaluation parameters, providing 84 references that are primarily related to issues or problems for clinical research trials. Together, these two parts offer a standard for the clinical testing of restorative materials/procedures and provide significant guidance for research teams in the design and conduct of contemporary clinical trials. Part 1 of the review considers the recruitment of subjects, restorations per subject, clinical events, validity versus bias, legal and regulatory aspects, rationales for clinical trial designs, guidelines for design, randomization, number of subjects, characteristics of participants, clinical assessment, standards and calibration, categories for assessment, criteria for evaluation, and supplemental documentation. Part 2 of the review considers categories of assessment for esthetic evaluation, functional assessment, biological responses to restorative materials, and statistical analysis of results. The overall review represents a considerable effort to include a range of clinical research interests over the past years. As part of the recognition of the importance of these suggestions, the review is being published simultaneously in identical form in both the "Journal of Adhesive Dentistry" and the "Clinical Oral Investigations." Additionally an extended abstract will be published in the "International Dental Journal" giving a link to the web full version. This should help to introduce these considerations more quickly to the scientific community.
    International Dental Journal 11/2007; 57(5):300-2. DOI:10.1007/s00784-006-0095-7 · 1.26 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract The close association between restorations with overhanging margins and chronic destructive periodontitis has been known for many years. However, the mechanisms by which overhanging restorations will interact in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease are still unknown. Generally it is accepted that overhanging restorations contribute to the promotion of the disease process by virtue of their capacity to retain bacterial plaque. The purpose of the present study was to determine if the placement of subgingival restorations with overhanging margins results in changes in the subgingival microflora. 9 dental students with clean teeth and clinically healthy gingivae (GI < 0.1) gave their consent to participate in the study. 5 MOD cast gold onlays with 1 mm proximal overhanging margins were placed in mandibular molars for 19–27 weeks. They were replaced in a cross-over design by 5 similar onlays with clinically perfect margins which served as controls. Another 5 onlays were placed in reverse order in the remaining patients. Prior to and every 2–3 weeks after insertion, subgingival microbiological samples were obtained by inserting a fine sterile paper point for 30 sec into the gingival sulcus subjacent to the restoration. The predominant cultivable flora was determined using continuous anaerobic culturing techniques. Following the placement of restorations with overhanging margins, a subgingival flora was detected which closely resembled that of chronic periodontitis. Increased proportions of Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria black-pigmented Bacteroides and an increased anaerobe: facultative ratio were noted. Following the placement of the restorations with clinically perfect margins, a microflora characteristic for gingival health or initial gingivitis was observed. Black-pigmented Bacteroides were detected in very low proportions (1.6–3.8%). These changes in the subgingival microflora were obvious irrespective of whether the restorations with the overhanging margins were placed in the first period of the experiment or following the cross-over. Clinically, increasing gingival indices were detected at the sites where overhanging margins were placed. Bleeding on gentle probing always preceded the peak level of black-pigmented Bacteroides, Loss of attachment was not detected in any site. Changes in the subgingival microflora after the placement of restorations with overhanging margins document a potential mechanism for the initiation of periodontal disease associated with iatrogenic factors.
    Journal Of Clinical Periodontology 12/1983; 10(6):563-78. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051X.1983.tb01295.x · 4.01 Impact Factor
Show more