Article

Investigation and treatment of missing item scores in test and questionnaire data

Multivariate Behavioral Research (Impact Factor: 2.97). 06/2010; 38(4). DOI: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3804_4

ABSTRACT This article first discusses a statistical test for investigating whether or not the pattern of missing scores in a respondent-by-item data matrix is random. Since this is an asymptotic test, we investigate whether it is useful in small but realistic sample sizes. Then, we discuss two known simple imputation methods, person mean (PM) and two-way (TW) imputation, and we propose two new imputation methods, response-function (RF) and mean response-function (MRF) imputation. These methods are based on few assumptions about the data structure. An empirical data example with simulated missing item scores shows that the new method RF was superior to the methods PM, TW, and MRF in recovering from incomplete data several statistical properties of the original complete data. Methods TW and RF are useful both when item score missingness is ignorable and nonignorable.

0 Followers
 · 
107 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study investigated the bias of factor loadings obtained from incomplete questionnaire data with imputed scores. Three models were used to generate discrete ordered rating scale data typical of questionnaires, also known as Likert data. These methods were the multidimensional polytomous latent trait model, a normal ogive item response theory model, and the discretized normal model. Incomplete data due to nonresponse were simulated using either missing completely at random or not missing at random mechanisms. Subsequently, for each incomplete data matrix, four imputation methods were applied for imputing item scores. Based on a completely crossed six-factor design, it was concluded that in general, bias was small for all data simulation methods and all imputation methods, and under all nonresponse mechanisms. Imputation method, two-way-plus-error, had the smallest bias in the factor loadings. Bias based on the discretized normal model was greater than that based on the other two models.
    Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 01/2005; 75(1). DOI:10.1080/00949650410001649318 · 0.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: The problem of missing values at the item level is common in studies using educational and psychological tests. The aim of the present work is to explore how the estimation of reliability is affected by missing values. Method: Using real data, we simulated missing values in accordance with a “missing at random mechanism”. Four factors were manipulated with the aim of checking their effect on the estimation of the reliability of the instrument: missing data mechanism, percentage of missing data in the database, sample size, and procedure employed for the treatment of missing values. Results: The results show that the quality of estimations depends on the interaction of various factors. The general tendency is that the estimations are worse when the sample size is small and the percentage of missing values increases. Listwise is the worst procedure for treatment of the missing data in the simulated conditions. Conclusions: It is concluded that with a small percentage of missing values one can obtain estimations that are acceptable from a practical point of view with all the procedures employed, except Listwise. Keywords: missing values, reliability, imputation, missing at random, test
    Psicothema 11/2014; 26(4):516-523. DOI:10.7334/psicothema2014.98 · 0.96 Impact Factor
  • Source

Preview

Download
0 Downloads
Available from