Contingent Symbiosis and Civil Society in an Authoritarian State: Understanding the Survival of China's Grassroots NGOs1

American Journal of Sociology (Impact Factor: 3.17). 07/2011; 117(1). DOI: 10.1086/660741


In the study of civil society, Tocqueville-inspired research has helped illuminate important connections between associations and democracy, while corporatism has provided a robust framework for understanding officially approved civil society organizations in authoritarian regimes. Yet neither approach accounts for the experiences of ostensibly illegal grassroots nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in an authoritarian state. Drawing on fieldwork in China, I argue that grassroots NGOs can survive in an authoritarian regime when the state is fragmented and when censorship keeps information local. Moreover, grassroots NGOs survive only insofar as they refrain from democratic claims-making and address social needs that might fuel grievances against the state. For its part, the state tolerates such groups as long as particular state agents can claim credit for any good works while avoiding blame for any problems. Grassroots NGOs and an authoritarian state can thus coexist in a "contingent symbiosis" that-far from pointing to an inevitable democratization- allows ostensibly illegal groups to operate openly while relieving the state of some of its social welfare obligations.

103 Reads
  • Source
    • "Meanwhile, HOAs are growing as civic territorial agencies to assert their property rights on behalf of homeowners (Fu & Lin, 2013b; Read, 2003), as demonstrated by many collective endeavors by homeowners to influence the practices or decisions of PMCs, developers, or administrative authorities . While some scholars juxtapose HOAs with the rise of civil society with Chinese characteristics (Shi & Cai, 2006), others (e.g., Spires, 2011) claim that mass organizations in China " survive only insofar as they refrain from democratic claim " (p. 1). Nonetheless, the rise of HOAs has offset the power relations between the state and the society, creating social space for civic participation (Bray, 2006; Read, 2003, 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper examines the relationship between communal space and grassroots participation in Chinese urban communities.•It draws on a city-wide household survey in Guangzhou.•This study performs Hierarchical Linear Models (HLM) and negative binomial regression models.•Local residents' community participation is positively associated with social cohesion and the presence of communal space.•Communal space has positive effects on participation by facilitating the formation of social capital and place attachment
    Habitat International 04/2015; 46. DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.10.013 · 1.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Increasingly, however, the corporatist model seems illequipped to explain the dynamics of Chinese social activism, where authorities are unable to impose their dictates on society and where groups that have been neither created by nor officially incorporated into the party-state are allowed to survive and even flourish. Instead, a system of 'symbiosis' is emerging as unlicensed civil actors are tolerated so long as they refrain from calling for wholesale political reform whilst addressing social needs that help relieve pressure on the government (Ho and Edmonds 2007, Spires 2011). The second, and perhaps more important point, concerns the recognition of an individual as producer and reformer of social situations, which allows the consideration of the 'subjectivity of the actors' as a significant variable, rather "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Visual imagery in environmental politics can be an effective way to engage the public. However, research based on 21 interviewees with activists from nine environmental non-governmental organisations (ENGOs) in China suggests that the value of images in promoting environmental initiatives is not limited to the exhibition of them, but is also seen in the making of them. Increasingly in China, ENGOs are offering free natural photographic tutoring to the public. Camera lenses are seen as conduits to recast self-nature relations, which has the potential to raise environmental awareness and promote ENGO membership. Drawing on both theories of social movements and contemporary Chinese subaltern political sociology, this paper provides new insights into grass-roots environmental mobilisation in China.
    Environmental Politics 09/2013; 22(5). DOI:10.1080/09644016.2013.817761 · 1.40 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Extant research on US foundations has found a generally conservative tendency towards support for professionalized non-governmental organizations (NGOs) rather than for potentially more radical grassroots organizations. Yet, the scholarly literature has had little to say about the decisions that grantmakers make when looking for grantees outside the USA. This article analyses data on over 2500 grants made to China between 2002 and 2009 to show that despite funders' rhetorical emphasis on NGOs and civil society organizations, in reality, the vast majority of funding has gone to government-controlled organizations, including academic institutions, government agencies, and government-organized NGOs. To help explain this gap between funder rhetoric and actual grantee choices, I draw on participant observation data and in-depth interviews with US-based donors and grassroots NGOs and argue that we can best understand the dynamics at work as a kind of ‘organizational homophily’, a process in which the personal preferences of large, elite-led US funders and institutional pressures from both China and the USA converge to systematically disadvantage grassroots NGOs.
    Journal of Civil Society 09/2011; 7(3-3):305-331. DOI:10.1080/17448689.2011.605005
Show more


103 Reads
Available from