Contingent Symbiosis and Civil Society in an Authoritarian State: Understanding the Survival of China's Grassroots NGOs1

American Journal of Sociology (Impact Factor: 3.17). 07/2011; 117. DOI: 10.1086/660741

ABSTRACT While Tocqueville-inspired research has shed light on the connection between associations and democracy, we should not assume that democracy is the inevitable offspring of civil society development. In (partial) recognition of this, corporatism has to date served as the main theoretical rubric for making sense of officially approved civil society organizations in authoritarian regimes. Yet neither a Tocqueville-inspired 'civil society as democracy' model nor a corporatist analytical framework can account for the experiences of bottom-up, ostensibly illegal grassroots NGOs (nongovernmental organizations) in an authoritarian state. This article uses such a case to argue that grassroots NGOs can survive in an authoritarian regime when the state needs some of the welfare services supplied by the NGO, when the state is fragmented, and when censorship of media keeps information local. Moreover, based on extensive fieldwork in China, I argue that grassroots NGOs survive in authoritarian regimes insofar as they refrain from broad democratic claims-making and insofar as they address social problems that might otherwise fuel grievances against the state. For its part, the state tolerates such groups as long as particular state agents can claim credit for good works while maintaining plausible deniability in the face of any problems, all the while reserving the right to suppress any group that begins to pose a threat. Grassroots NGOs and authoritarian states can thus co-exist in a 'contingent symbiosis' – a fragile relationship that – far from pointing to any sort of inevitable democratization – allows ostensibly illegal groups to operate openly while relieving the state of some of its social welfare obligations. 1 I would like to thank Deborah Davis for her patient guidance and detailed comments on earlier drafts of this article, and for her encouragement throughout the research process. I also owe a debt of gratitude to Kai Erikson, Ron Eyerman, John Nguyet Erni, Ling-Yun Tang, Kin-man Chan, Rachel Stern, Eli Friedman, my colleagues at The CUHK Centre for Civil Society Studies, and the anonymous AJS reviewers for their excellent suggestions for revision. I regret I cannot thank by name the numerous people in China who shared their time and perspectives with me. Any inaccuracies or omissions are entirely my own.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Post-normalisation Sino-Japanese relations have been fraught with contradictions. In particular, three paradoxes stand out over the past 40 years. First, despite many shared geopolitical and economic interests, China and Japan have never developed genuine strategic cooperation, and since the 2000s have even evinced a trend towards thinly-veiled or open rivalry. Second, time, rather than healing the wounds of past wars, has since the mid-1980s yielded only a more vivid and bitter recollection of history that has bedevilled both official and popular relations. Third, diplomatic and commercial ties as well as “thick” societal contacts developed since normalisation have failed to bridge a significant gap in values. This article reviews Sino-Japanese relations since 1972, with a special focus on internal politics on both sides. It considers the influence of their conflicting historical narratives and political systems, and of the broader international geopolitical context, on the evolution of their delicate, paradoxical bilateral relationship. It concludes that a healthier bilateral relationship may depend on the development in both countries of a genuine, robust civil society that is relatively free from political interference.
    China Perspectives. 01/2013;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The proliferation of civic groups has been one of the most intriguing features of China’s societal transformation over the past three decades. The massive spread of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) has given rise to a broad debate among China scholars about the nature of Chinese state–NGO relations. Several authors have developed theoretical concepts that highlight and explain the multifaceted and highly complex nature of relations between civic organizations and the party-state. Against this backdrop we develop the notion of embeddedness versus marginalization to unravel these complexities and clarify ambiguities. Drawing on in-depth case studies of nine Chinese NGOs working with children and youth, this article proposes a comprehensive conceptualization of Chinese civic groups’ political embeddedness versus marginalization. First, we identify three separate indicators of embeddedness: formal registration, informal ties with public authorities, and the political economy of NGO–government relations. Second, we discuss three factors that have a major influence on these indicators of embeddedness. While some of the dynamics discussed might be specific to children and youth NGOs, comparisons with the findings on NGOs working in different fields suggest that the notion of embeddedness versus marginalization may also apply to other sectors of social activism. Therefore, our study offers a more nuanced understanding of Chinese state–NGO relations.
    China Information 10/2014; 28(3):311-337.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article examines how international resources can be used to strengthen local support for civil society initiatives in China to improve the circumstances of poor and vulnerable populations. It identifies ways in which international resources have strengthened civil society in other countries, such as enhancing access to financial resources, building capacity of leaders and organizations, reducing sector fragmentation, building public legitimacy and improving cross-sector relations. It examines the characteristics and special circumstances facing civil society in China, arguing that institutional constraints are particularly problematic. Then it explores how international resources might be applied to each of the problem areas identified given the constraints of the Chinese context. Finally the article articulates five principles that might guide international donors for building more local support for civil society activity in China.
    Voluntas 01/2012; 23(3). · 0.56 Impact Factor


Available from