The short-term effect of verbally assessing drivers' state on vigilance indices during monotonous daytime driving

Institut für Experimentelle Psychologie, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, D-40225, Düsseldorf; Daimler AG; Research and Development, GR/PAP, 50-G024, D-71059, Sindelfingen, HPC; Wilhelm-Schickard-Institut für Informatik, University of Tübingen, D-72076, Tübingen
Transportation Research 07/2013; 14:251-260. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2011.01.005

ABSTRACT To investigate the effects of verbal assessment of subjective driver state on objective indicators of vigilance state during a monotonous daytime drive, a real road driving study was conducted. During a 4-h drive participants’ subjective state (sleepiness, inattention,
monotony) was assessed every 20 min by an investigator accompanying the drive. The
assessment procedure consisted of roughly 1 min of verbal interaction. Physiological
indicators (EEG alpha spindle rate, blink duration, heart rate) revealed a significant
improvement of vigilance state during the communication episode as compared to a
pre-assessment baseline. The activation persisted for up to 2 min following the end of
the verbal interaction. Reaction times supported these findings by indicating a significant
decrease after the communication. The P3 amplitude of the auditory event-related potential
did not show any consistent results. It can be concluded that a short verbal assessment
has positive effects on drivers’ vigilance state. However, these effects persist only for a very
limited time. The implications of these findings for the frequency of verbal assessment
during experimental studies and for the use of verbal communication as a fatigue countermeasure are discussed.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine whether real-life driving would produce different effects from those obtained in a driving simulator on fatigue, performances and sleepiness. Cross-over study involving real driving (1200 km) or simulated driving after controlled habitual sleep (8 hours) or restricted sleep (2 hours). Sleep laboratory and open French Highway. Twelve healthy men (mean age +/- SD = 21.1 +/- 1.6 years, range 19-24 years, mean yearly driving distance +/- SD = 6563 +/- 1950 miles) free of sleep disorders. Self-rated fatigue and sleepiness, simple reaction time before and after each session, number of inappropriate line crossings from the driving simulator and from video-recordings of real driving. Line crossings were more frequent in the driving simulator than in real driving (P < .001) and were increased by sleep deprivation in both conditions. Reaction times (10% slowest) were slower during simulated driving (P = .004) and sleep deprivation (P = .004). Subjects had higher sleepiness scores in the driving simulator (P = .016) and in the sleep restricted condition (P = .001). Fatigue increased over time (P = .011) and with sleep deprivation (P = .000) but was similar in both driving conditions. Fatigue can be equally studied in real and simulated environments but reaction time and self-evaluation of sleepiness are more affected in a simulated environment. Real driving and driving simulators are comparable for measuring line crossings but the effects are of higher amplitude in the simulated condition. Driving simulator may need to be calibrated against real driving in various condition.
    Sleep 12/2005; 28(12):1511-6. · 5.06 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Performance on the psychomotor vigilance task (PVT) sensitively reflects a circadian modulation of neurobehavioral functions, as well as the effect of sleep pressure developing with duration of time awake, without being confounded by a learning curve. Sixteen healthy volunteers underwent two 40-h constant posture protocols in a balanced crossover design. During these protocols, either low sleep pressure conditions were attained by an alternating cycle of 150 min of wakefulness and 75 min of sleep (NAP) protocol, or high sleep pressure conditions were achieved by total sleep deprivation (SD) protocol. During scheduled wakefulness in both protocols, the PVT was carried out every 225 min. Quantitative analysis of the lapses, slowest (90th percentile) and fastest (10th percentile) reaction times (RTs) during the protocols, indicated that the lapses and slowest RTs were sensitive to changes in homeostatic sleep pressure. Our data indicate that the difference between the fastest and slowest RTs (interpercentile range 10th-90th percentile) was particular sensitive to detect very early effects of growing sleep pressure. On the other hand, decrements in PVT performance which were related to circadian phase did not depend significantly on any categorization (such as percentiles of the RTs).
    Physiology & Behavior 03/2004; 80(5):695-701. · 3.03 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the effects of monotonous daytime driving on vigilance state and particularly the ability to judge this state, a real road driving study was conducted. To objectively assess vigilance state, performance (auditory reaction time) and physiological measures (EEG: alpha spindle rate, P3 amplitude; ECG: heart rate) were recorded continuously. Drivers judged sleepiness, attention to the driving task and monotony retrospectively every 20 min. Results showed that prolonged daytime driving under monotonous conditions leads to a continuous reduction in vigilance. Towards the end of the drive, drivers reported a subjectively improved vigilance state, which was contrary to the continued decrease in vigilance as indicated by all performance and physiological measures. These findings indicate a lack of self-assessment abilities after approximately 3h of continuous monotonous daytime driving.
    Accident; analysis and prevention 10/2009; 41(5):1087-93. · 1.65 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 22, 2014