The short-term effect of verbally assessing drivers' state on vigilance indices during monotonous daytime driving

Institut für Experimentelle Psychologie, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, D-40225, Düsseldorf
Transportation Research 07/2013; 14:251-260. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2011.01.005


To investigate the effects of verbal assessment of subjective driver state on objective indicators of vigilance state during a monotonous daytime drive, a real road driving study was conducted. During a 4-h drive participants’ subjective state (sleepiness, inattention,
monotony) was assessed every 20 min by an investigator accompanying the drive. The
assessment procedure consisted of roughly 1 min of verbal interaction. Physiological
indicators (EEG alpha spindle rate, blink duration, heart rate) revealed a significant
improvement of vigilance state during the communication episode as compared to a
pre-assessment baseline. The activation persisted for up to 2 min following the end of
the verbal interaction. Reaction times supported these findings by indicating a significant
decrease after the communication. The P3 amplitude of the auditory event-related potential
did not show any consistent results. It can be concluded that a short verbal assessment
has positive effects on drivers’ vigilance state. However, these effects persist only for a very
limited time. The implications of these findings for the frequency of verbal assessment
during experimental studies and for the use of verbal communication as a fatigue countermeasure are discussed.

Download full-text


Available from: Wilhelm Emil Kincses,
  • Source
    • "A few studies evaluated background EEG during on-the-road driving in healthy volunteers and found that brain activation decreases (i.e. increases in theta and alpha power spectra) with time-on-task (Brookhuis & de Waard, 1993; Schmidt, Schrauf, Simon, Buchner, & Kincses, 2011), during night-time driving (Akerstedt et al., 2013; Kecklund & Akerstedt, 1993; Sandberg et al., 2011), and after sleep deprivation (Papadelis et al., 2007). Similar changes in EEG have been reported by investigators using driving simulators (e.g. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Insomniacs report decreased performance in daily routines, which may have detrimental consequences for car driving. We compared changes over time in driving performance (measured as Standard Deviation of Lateral Position-SDLP) and background EEG between 20 untreated insomnia patients (52-70 years old) and 21 normal sleepers (54-73 years old) during a one hour on-the-road driving test after a normal night of sleep, in the morning. SDLP did not differ between groups and increased slightly over time to similar degrees in both groups. EEG alpha and beta power were lower in insomniacs as compared to normal sleepers. Alpha and beta power slightly reduced during driving in normal sleepers but remained at a constant low level in insomniacs. Changes in EEG power and SDLP were not related. It is concluded that on-the-road driving performance does not differ between older insomniacs and older normal sleepers and that changes in spectral EEG measures of cortical arousal and in driving performance are not related. Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    Biological Psychology 04/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.04.002 · 3.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "At the end of each sequence, the drivers were asked to retrospectively self-assess both their lane-keeping performance and their mental effort. The timing of both sequences (75 and 90 min into the drive) was determined so as to allow for enough time-on-task before considering the BZD's impact (Verster and Roth, 2013b), and to avoid the confounding effect of increased vigilance that presumably occurred when drivers performed their return manoeuvres halfway through (Schmidt et al., 2011; Verster and Roth, 2013b). The drivers were kept under medical supervision for 8 h after the treatment intake, and were not allowed to drive their own vehicle until the following morning. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The adverse effects of benzodiazepines on driving are widely recognised. The aims of this study were both to determine the impact of naturalistic conversation on the driving ability of drivers under a benzodiazepine, and to measure the accuracy of drivers’ assessments of the joint effects of the benzodiazepine and conversation. Sixteen healthy male participants (29.69 ± 3.30 years) underwent a randomised, crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with the benzodiazepine lorazepam (2 mg). They drove 200 km (125 miles) on a motorway in the morning. We measured two driving ability-related variables (i.e., lane-keeping performance), and collected a set of self-assessed variables (i.e., self-assessment of driving performance) during two 10-min sequences of interest (no conversation vs. conversation). An analysis of variance revealed an interaction whereby lane-keeping performance under lorazepam was worse in the no-conversation condition than in the conversation condition. No such difference was detected under placebo. Pearson's correlation coefficients revealed that self-assessments were (i) not at all predictive of lane-keeping when performed before the drive, but (ii) moderately predictive of lane-keeping performance when performed during or after the drive. We conclude that conversation with a passenger may contribute to safer lane-keeping when driving under a benzodiazepine. Moreover, a degree of awareness may be attained after some experience of driving under the influence of this type of medication.
    Accident; analysis and prevention 02/2014; 2014(67):61-66. DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2014.02.009 · 1.65 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Unlabelled: The effect of spatial compatibility on dual-task performance for various display-control configurations was studied using a tracking task and a discrete four-choice response task. A total of 36 participants took part in this study, and they were asked to perform the primary tracking task while at the same time to respond to an occasional signal. Different levels of compatibility between the stimuli and responses of the discrete response task were found to lead to different degrees of influence on the tracking task. However, degradation of performance was observed for both tasks, which was probably due to resource competition for the visual and spatial resources required for simultaneous task operation and required for bimanual responses. No right-left prevalence effect for the spatial compatibility task was observed in this study, implying that the use of unimanual two-finger responses may not provide the right conditions for a significant effect in the horizontal right-left dimension. Practitioner summary: The effect of spatial compatibility in multiple display-control configurations was examined in a dual-task paradigm. The analyses of keen competition for visual and spatial resources in processing the dual tasks under different degrees of stimulus-response compatibility provide useful ergonomics design implications and recommendations for visual interfaces requiring frequent visual scanning.
    Ergonomics 11/2014; 58(3):1-15. DOI:10.1080/00140139.2014.978901 · 1.56 Impact Factor