Article

PCR Detection of Listeria monocytogenes Using Specific Virulence Factor Genes

Department of Food Biotechnology, Kyung Hee University, 449-701, Suwon, Korea; Department of Food and Bioengineering, Kyungwon University, 461-701, Songnam, Korea; Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Seoul National University, 151-742, Seoul, Korea
Journal of Applied Biological Chemistry 01/2004; 47:102-105.

ABSTRACT To investigate the novel specific genes of Listeria monocytogenes, six genes related with virulence factor of L. monocytogenes were selected from database. Primer sets were constructed from the selected six genes to evaluate the specificity of L. monocytogenes with other Listeria species. The primers were tested with 12 strains of Listeria species: L. monocytogenes (7 strains), L. welshimeri, L. innocua, L. seeligeri, L. ivanovii, and L. grayi. All primer sets showed specificity to L. monocytogenes but not with other Listeria species. These genes could be used as target genes for the detection of L. monocytogenes. Key words: Listeria monocytogenes, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), food-borne pathogen, detection, virulence factor gene. Listeria monocytogenes causes severe infections in humans, including neonatal listeriosis, endocarditis, and meningitis, with a fatality rate as high as 20 to 40%. 1) Therefore, interest in developing a fast, economical, and specific tests for the detection of L. monocytogenes in various types of food has been increasing. However, one of the major problems involved in L. monocytogenes detection is the inability to distinguish L. monocytogenes from other non-pathogenic Listeria species, particularly L. innocua which may predominate in food samples. Conventional methods for detecting L. monocytogenes involve multiple selective enrichment steps followed by biochemical and serotyping. However, these methods are time-consuming and generally require more than 2 days. 2) The advantages of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with respects to its specificity, reliability, and rapidity helps in the detection of food-borne pathogens. Detection methods of Listeria monocytogenes using PCR have been reported using one or two target genes including hly (listeriolysin O), 3-7) iap (60-kDa secreted invasion-associated protein p60), 8-10) inlA (internalin A), 11,12) and inlB (internalin B). 12) However, this method of detection of Listeria monocytogenes using one target gene has the problems of specificity. The sequence analyses by using hly and iap as target gene of L. monocytogenes, showed strain-specific nucleotide differences among L. monocytogenes strains. 13) These problems can be addressed using several target genes for PCR detection. Analysis of PCR products can offer more precise results in the detection of L. monocytogenes. Therefore, selection of specific genes of L. monocytogenes among Listeria species is needed for PCR detection. The sequences of virulence factor genes such as prfA, plcA, hly, mpl, actA, and plcB in L. monocytogenes have been reported. 14) However, as such there are no reports regarding the specificity of these genes in Listeria species. In this study, specific genes of L. monocytogenes were selected to find unique genes for novel target of PCR. Primers from selected genes were prepared and evaluated in PCR assays for the detecting L. monocytogenes with genomic DNA extracted from pure cultured Listeria species.

3 Bookmarks
 · 
657 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A 24-h filter monitor-based test, Listeria-SELeCT, has been developed to quantify Listeria monocytogenes organisms in meat samples with a sensitivity of < or = 1.0 CFU/g. The technique comprises a filter monitor-based system and a colony lift immunoassay to identify and enumerate the target organism. Meat homogenates were centrifuged and the eluate was filtered to trap and immobilize the microorganisms on the filter. Fraser broth was then added to the filter apparatus to allow the organisms to become established overnight and to inhibit contaminants, after which the filters were transferred onto Modified Oxford medium agar, a selective medium for L. monocytogenes. After 10 to 12 h, a colony lift immunoassay was used to confirm and enumerate suspect colonies on the filter. A correlation study between the Listeria-SELeCT method and the most probable number technique showed the Listeria-SELeCT to be considerably more accurate than the most probable number for quantitatively determining the number of viable organisms in meat samples. Because of ease and speed of testing, the Listeria-SELeCT system also provided major advantages over the most probable number technology.
    Journal of food protection 03/2000; 63(3):347-53. · 1.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A method was developed for detection of Listeria monocytogenes by polymerase chain reaction amplification followed by agarose gel electrophoresis or dot blot analysis with a 32P-labeled internal probe. The technique identified 95 of 95 L. monocytogenes strains, 0 of 12 Listeria strains of other species, and 0 of 12 non-Listeria strains.
    Applied and Environmental Microbiology 10/1990; 56(9):2930-2. · 3.95 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To develop a 24-h system for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes in ham. An immunomagnetic separation (IMS) of bacteria directly from ham followed by extraction of DNA and detection using a new multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used. The PCR method used one primer pair targeted at the listeriolysin O gene of L. monocytogenes and the other pair for a region of the 23S rRNA genes of Listeria, giving products of 706 and 239 bp, respectively. The combined IMS/PCR was calculated to be capable of detecting as few as 1.1 L. monocytogenes cells g-1 in a 25-g ham sample. The process produced acceptable results, but the IMS step is the main barrier to further improvement of sensitivity. The DNA isolation was the most time-consuming step in the process. A 24-h test for the presence of L. monocytogenes will be useful to the food industry and significantly assist in the timely investigation of outbreaks.
    Journal of Applied Microbiology 05/2001; 90(4):614-21. · 2.20 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
49 Downloads
Available from