A Bioequivalence study of two Azithromycin tablet formulations in Indonesian healthy subjects

Journal of Bioequivalence & Bioavailability 05/2012; 4(5):048-051. DOI: 10.4172/jbb.1000111


Aim: To compare the bioavailability of two Azithromycin tablet formulations 500 mg Azivol® tablets as test
formulation and 500 mg Zithromax® tablets as reference formulation.
Methods: A single-dosed, open-label randomized two-way crossover design under fasting period with two
weeks wash-out period was evaluated in 24 subjects. For the analysis of pharmacokinetic properties, the blood
samples were drawn taken up to 120 hours after dosing. Plasma concentration of Azithromycin was determined
using liquid chromatography – tandem mass spectrometry method with TurboIon Spray mode. Pharmacokinetic
parameters AUC0-t, AUC0-∞ and Cmax were tested for bioequivalence after log-transformation of data and ratios of tmax
were evaluated non-parametrically.
Results: The point estimates and 90% confidence intervals (CI) for AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, and Cmax for Azithromycin
were 94.63% (86.27-103.81%), 95.35% (87.15-104.31%), 94.16% (80.31-110.41%) respectively.
Conclusion: These results indicated that the two formulations of Azithromycin were bioequivalent and thus may
be prescribed interchangeably.

436 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: In recent years, the use of generic drugs has been increasing due to their effectiveness and to the increasing variety of drugs that are now available in generic formulations. Although several generic oral formulations of azithromycin are available in China, information concerning the bioavailability of these formulations in the Chinese population is unavailable.Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the bioequivalence and tolerability of a single oral dose of 2 commercial brands of 500-mg azithromycin granules in healthy Han Chinese volunteers.Methods: In a randomized, open-label, 2-period crossover study, the bioequivalence and tolerability of 2 commercial formulations of azithromycin granules (test: Dayin Ocean Biochemical Company Ltd., Shandong, China; reference: Taiyang Drug Company Ltd., Beijing, China) were compared in healthy adult Han Chinese volunteers. Both the test and the reference formulations were administered to each subject. The 2 treatment phases were separated by a 3-week washout period. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to determine plasma drug concentrations. The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the natural log-transformed ratios of Cmax and AUC were within the predetermined equivalence range of 70% to 143% and 80% to 125%, respectively, and if P ≤ 0.05 for the 90% CIs.Results: Twenty-four male Han Chinese volunteers (mean [SD] age, 21.0 [2.0] years [range, 18-25 years]; mean [SD] weight, 67.6 [5.6] kg [range, 56-81 kg]; mean [SD] height, 176.0 [5.0] cm [range, 165-188 cm]) were enrolled. Twenty-two subjects completed the study, with 2 withdrawing for personal reasons. No period or sequence effect was observed. The 90% CIs for the corresponding ratios of Cmax, AUC from hour 0 to time t, and AUC from hour 0 to any time point were 85.9 to 103.9, 83.6 to 106.0, and 84.7 to 105.9 (in the 2 one-sided t tests; all, P < 0.05), respectively. Similar results were found in data without a logarithmic transformation. There were no significant differences in the plasma concentration-time curves of the test and reference formulations. No adverse events were reported by the subjects or revealed by clinical or laboratory tests.Conclusions: Single oral doses of 2 commercial brands of azithromycin granules (500 mg) were equivalent with regard to the rate and extent of absorption among these healthy Han Chinese volunteers. Both formulations were well tolerated.
    Current Therapeutic Research 09/2007; 68(5):369-377. DOI:10.1016/j.curtheres.2007.10.005 · 0.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Azithromycin is an azalide antimicrobial agent. Structurally related to the macrolide antibiotic erythromycin, its mechanism of activity (similar to erythromycin) is interference with bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 50S component of the 70S ribosomal subunit. Although slightly less potent than erythromycin against gram-positive organisms, azithromycin demonstrates superior activity in vitro against a wide variety of gram-negative bacilli, including Haemophilus influenzae. Absorption is approximately 37% after a 500-mg oral dose. The large volume of distribution (23 L/kg) and low peak serum level (0.4 micrograms/ml) are consistent with data demonstrating extensive tissue distribution and intracellular accumulation. Metabolism is predominantly hepatic (to inactive metabolites), with biliary excretion a major pathway of elimination. Drug elimination is biphasic, with a terminal half-life of up to 5 days. Published trials have examined the efficacy and safety of azithromycin in the treatment of adults with upper and lower respiratory tract infections, skin and skin structure infections, streptococcal pharyngitis, and sexually transmitted diseases. Many used a 5-day course of 250 mg once daily, supplemented with a 250-mg dose on the first day of therapy. Selected trials in sexually transmitted diseases examined single 1-g doses. Promising results also were obtained with oral daily doses of 500 mg in patients with human immunoviral infection who also had Mycobacterium avium complex infection and in animals with toxoplasmosis. Adverse reactions are primarily gastrointestinal (nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain), with minimal laboratory abnormalities reported. Gastrointestinal tolerance is better than that of erythromycin. Drug interactions have not been observed to date, although coadministration of azithromycin with a large meal may reduce absorption by up to 50%.
    Pharmacotherapy 02/1992; 12(3):161-73. DOI:10.1002/j.1875-9114.1992.tb04504.x · 2.66 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Two studies have been performed to assess the relative bioavailability of Azomycin (Julphar, UAE) as compared with Zithromax (Pfizer, USA) at the International Pharmaceutical Research Center (IPRC), Amman, Jordan. One study involved Azomycin capsules and the other Azomycin suspension. Each study enrolled 24 volunteers and in both studies, after an overnight fasting, the two brands of azithromycin were administered as single dose on two treatment days separated by a 2 weeks washout period. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 192 h. Plasma harvested from blood, was analysed for azithromycin by HPLC coupled with electrochemical detection. Various pharmacokinetic parameters including AUC(0-t,) AUC(0-infinity,) C(max), T(max), T(1/2) and K(elm) were determined from plasma concentrations for both formulations and found to be in good agreement with the reported values. AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) were tested for bioequivalence after log-transformation of data. No significant difference was found based on ANOVA; 90% confidence intervals for the test/reference ratios of these parameters were found within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80-125%. Based on these statistical inferences it was concluded that Azomycin capsule is bioequivalent to Zithromax capsule and Azomycin suspension is bioequivalent to Zithromax suspension.
    Biopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition 01/2001; 22(1):15-21. DOI:10.1002/bdd.252 · 2.34 Impact Factor