A survey to assess the provision of conscious sedation by general dental practitioners in the Republic of Ireland.

ABSTRACT Aim: To quantify and qualify how conscious sedation was used in general dental practice before the introduction of formal sedation teaching in the Republic of Ireland. Objectives: 1. To determine the extent of use of oral, inhalational and intravenous sedation; 2. to determine the training and experience of general dental practitioners providing conscious sedation; 3. to determine the perceived barriers to the practice of conscious sedation; and, 4. to gauge the level of interest in a postgraduate course in conscious sedation. Method: Postal questionnaire sent to one general practitioner in seven, selected randomly from the General Dental Council register, in 2007. Results: Seventy six percent of respondents agreed that the provision of conscious sedation in general dental practice is important. However, the current provision of inhalation and intravenous sedation by respondents is low in comparison to provision in the UK. The main barrier to the use of conscious sedation in general dental practice appears to be lack of availability of training. Conclusions: The data from this study indicated the need for postgraduate training in conscious sedation in Ireland and a need for increased awareness of the Dental Council Code of Practice on sedation.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives To investigate responses rates and factors affecting response rate of dentists to mailed questionnaires and to suggest methods of improving the response.Data sources Hand search of the British Dental Journal, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, Journal of American Dental Association and Dental Update 1989–1992.Study selection All papers including mailed questionnaires were included. (Some copies of JADA in 1992 were not searched).Data extraction Various aspects of questionnaire design were noted and a simple subjective assessment of the length of the questionnaire into three categories was made (simple, moderate and complicated). Overall response rate was measured as was the status of the respondents and their country of origin.Results Of the 3140 papers examined 2.5% (77) involved questionnaires. Response rates varied from 17–100%. Simple questionnaires produce a higher response rate than complex ones (60% compared with 72%). Higher response rates were obtained from those carried out in Australia or Canada (3 studies only) and which were short in length (less than 10 questions or requiring no written answers). The use of various incentives such as reply paid envelopes, reminders, appears to increase response rate the highest responses being in those questionnaires with more incentives.Conclusion The subject of the questionnaire, incentives offered and the length of the questionnaire may be factors involved in the response rates to mailed questionnaires. The authors suggest many methods for increasing response rates derived from a further review of the literature. Other possible factors include advanced notification, appearance and personalisation of the questionnaire, presence and wording of a covering letter asking for help and stressing the importance of the survey, confidentiality and well timed reminders.
    Evidence-Based Dentistry 01/1998; DOI:10.1038/sj.ebd.6490009
  • British dental journal 04/1979; 146(6):177-82. DOI:10.1038/sj.bdj.4804223 · 1.08 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this follow-up study was to assess and compare the quantity and quality of dental undergraduate teaching in conscious sedation with comparisons to a previous study conducted in 1998. Questionnaires were designed to collect information about undergraduate sedation education from teaching staff and final-year dental undergraduates at the 15 dental schools in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Staff responses from 9 schools (60%) and student responses from 11 schools (73%) were received. From the students' responses, the mean (range) number of cases observed in inhalational sedation was 7 (0-17) and the mean (range) number performed in inhalational sedation was 4 (0-8). The mean (range) number of cases observed in intravenous sedation was 9 (2-19), and the mean (range) number performed was 5 (0-8). There has been an increase in didactic teaching. There has been a decrease in the observing of inhalational cases, but an increase in the hands-on performance of this type of sedation. There is an increase in the hands-on teaching of intravenous sedation.
    Anesthesia Progress 02/2006; 53(2):43-8. DOI:10.2344/0003-3006(2006)53[43:AFSOTT]2.0.CO;2


Available from