Pedestrian Access to Transit: Identifying Redundancies and Gaps Using a Variable Service Area Analysis

School of Urban Planning, McGill University, H3A 2K6, Québec, Canada


Available from: Ahmed M. El-Geneidy, Apr 25, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper re-considers the problem of choosing the number of bus stops along urban routes, first by estimating the probability of stopping in low demand markets, and second by analysing the interplay between bus stop size, bus running speed, spacing and congestion in high demand markets. A comprehensive review of the theory and practice on the location and spacing of bus stops is presented. Using empirical data from Sydney, Australia, we show that the widely used Poisson model overestimates the probability of stopping in an on-call bus stopping regime, and consequently underestimates the optimal number of bus stops that should be designed. For fixed-stop services, we show that bus running speed, frequency and dwell time are crucial to determining the relationship between bus stop spacing and demand, with bus stop congestion in the form of queuing delays playing a key role. In particular, we find that bus stop spacing should be decreased if demand increases at a constant bus running speed; however, if both bus running speed and the speed of the passenger boarding process increase, then the distance between bus stops should be kept long even at high demand levels, a result that is consistent with the implementation of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) systems that feature high bus running speeds and long distances between stops relative to conventional bus services.
    Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice 01/2014; 59:37–57. DOI:10.1016/j.tra.2013.10.010 · 2.73 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this study, we employ spatial regression analysis to empirically investigate the impacts of land use, rail service coverage, and rail station accessibility on rail transit ridership in the city of Seoul and the surrounding metropolitan region. Our analyses suggest that a rail transit service coverage boundary of 500 m provides the best fit for estimating rail transit ridership levels. With regard to land use, our results confirm that density is positively related to rail transit ridership within a 750 m radius of each station. In contrast, land use diversity is not associated with rail transit ridership. We also found that station-level accessibility is as important as land use for explaining rail transit ridership levels. Finally, we conclude that development density and station-level accessibility measures such as the number of station entrances or exits and the number of bus routes at the station are the most important and consistent factors for promoting rail transit ridership.
    Journal of Transport Geography 04/2014; 36:134–140. DOI:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.03.013 · 2.54 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Current research focuses on pedestrian access to transit; however, commuter trains in outlying urban regions serve populations in low-density areas where many people drive rather than walk to transit services. The determinants that influence how far people are willing to drive to train stations and the factors that determine boardings at suburban train stations have not been formally studied. This paper models suburban commuter travel demand by use of the 2003 Montreal, Quebec, Canada, origin-destination survey and onboard survey data from the Agence Métropolitaine de Transport to identify characteristics of individual trips and station characteristics that influence the driving distance to commuter rail and demand at stations. The models show that methods for estimating pedestrian access distance and number of boardings per transit stop can easily be transferred to estimating driving access distance and the number of boardings per station in the park-and-ride context. The model for passenger boardings by station can be used for estimating either demand for a planned station or the effect of service interventions (e.g., parking spots) on boardings at existing stations. The paper also shows that these approaches can be a valuable tool to transit planners interested in increasing passenger demand on commuter rail through a better understanding of service characteristics.
    Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board 01/2011; DOI:10.3141/2219-12 · 0.44 Impact Factor