The relationship between culture and corruption: a cross-national study

Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt; Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon, and; DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
Journal of Intellectual Capital 01/2009; 10(1). DOI: 10.1108/14691930910922978

ABSTRACT Purpose – This paper aims to investigate the relationship between the GLOBE (Global Leadership and Organizational Behaviour Effectiveness) project national cultural dimensions of values and practices and the Corruption Perception Index (CPI). Design/methodology/approach – Most empirical research on culture dimensions and corruption is based on Hofstede's dataset of culture conducted more than 25 years ago. Evidence from a more recent dataset of culture dimensions is needed before current generalizations can be made. The GLOBE project is based on the perceptions of 18,000 individuals. Findings – The results provide empirical support for the influence of uncertainty avoidance values, human orientation practices, and individual collectivism practices on the level of corruption after controlling for economic and human development, which, in turn, adds to the efforts to build a general theory of the culture perspective of corruption. Research limitations/implications – The findings offer valuable insights on why cultural values and cultural practices should be distinguished as they relate to corruption. Practical implications – International policy makers as well as managers at multinational corporations can benefit from the findings of this research study. Originality/value – The research reported is among the first to investigate the issue of corruption from the perspective of national cultural values and practices.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Transparency initiatives (TI) are essential elements to corruption and corrupt behavior. Corruption is a fiduciary crime that is believed to penetrate slowly into the construction sectors. Diverse characteristics of human behavior affect the attitude towards corrupt activities. The objectives are: (1) to investigate sources of corruption and (2) to identify strategies to reduce corruption in construction. A workshop was conducted to derive to the solutions. Weaknesses in the system and economic pressure are two technical sources of corruption, while, human behaviour to corrupt is affected by culture, society and personality. The person attitudes and self-value are two strategies in curbing corruption.
    Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 50:350–360.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this work is to analyse the influence of sociocultural factors on corruption levels. Taking as starting point Husted (J Int Bus Studies 30:339–359, 1999) and Graeff (In: Lambsdorff J, Taube M, Schramm M (eds) The new institutional economics of corruption. Routledge, London, 2005) proposals, we consider both the interrelation between cultural dimensions and the diverse expressions of social capital with corruption. According to our results, the universalistic trust (linking and bridging social capital) constitutes a positive social capital that is negatively linked to corruption. In contrast, the particularistic levels of trust (bonding) can constitute a negative social capital directly related to corruption levels. Furthermore, cultures which are favourable to the legitimation of dependency relations and the formation of closed particularistic groups (power-distance and community factors) create a breeding ground for the development of these amoral rent-seeking structures.
    Journal of Business Ethics · 0.96 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ‘Public Affairs’ is not a term most people in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) will recognise and associate with interest representation and lobbying as ways of linking business, society and government. The term may be seen as a euphemism for corruption-inspired ‘lobbying’, an artificial and confusing umbrella term or a public relations creation. It is a term in transition for a subject in transition in a part of Europe in transition. Even as part of the European Union, CEE is still different, in transition, finding its own feet like a phoenix arising from the ashes of 50 years of communism, but slowly, in bursts, réculer pour mieux sauter and very different from country to country. Which are the features and values of the 50 years of communism that will disappear, fast more slowly, which ones will linger on? What are the institutions in CEE countries that public affairs will have to deal with, and what is the view on transparency and transparency regulation in CEE? To add understanding, values, cultural differences, institutional context and other factors affecting the public affairs environment are examined. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    Journal of Public Affairs 02/2014;

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 6, 2014