Fetal transcerebellar diameter nomogram in Nepalese population

Journal of Institute of Medicine 05/2010; 32(1). DOI: 10.3126/joim.v32i1.3997


Introduction: Sonographic determination of gestational age (GA) is becoming increasingly important. Many parameters can be used for establishing GA. The transverse cerebellar diameter (TCD) is a reliable parameter for estimating it. Fetal cerebellum grows progressively along with GA and can predict GA at any trimester. This study was undertaken to construct an institution specific Transcerebellar diameter (TCD) nomogram and to compare its ability to predict gestational age with previously published nomograms. Methods: A cross-sectional nomogram was constructed using TCD measurements of 594 singleton fetuses in Nepalese population by using linear regression model. Measurements were obtained by placing the calipers of the ultrasound machine at the outer – to-outer margins of the cerebellum. The suitability of previously established TCD nomograms for predicting gestational age was assessed in Nepalese population to determine comparability between nomograms. Results: Gestational age and TCD 50 th percentile in mm coincided well till 20 th week of gestation. Between 21 st to 28 th weeks of gestation, there were no clinically important differences between our nomogram and previously published in terms of the predicted gestational age. However, predicted gestational age in third trimester was considerably different by using our nomogram by 1-2 weeks from 29-32 weeks and by 3-6 weeks after 33 weeks. There were differences of 4-6 mm between 29-32 weeks and of 7-11 mm after 33 weeks. Conclusions: TCD measurements had a similar relationship with gestational age across previously published nomograms before 28 weeks. Significant differences occurred in predicting gestational age after 33 weeks.

110 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the performance and the utility of using birthweight-adjusted scores of Dubowitz and Ballard methods of estimating gestational age in a Zimbabwean population. The Dubowitz and the Ballard methods of estimating gestational age were administered to 364 African newborn infants with a known last menstrual period (LMP) at Harare Maternity Hospital. Both methods were good predictors of gestational age useful in differentiating term from pre-term infants. Our regression line was Y((LMP gestational age))=23.814+0.301*score for the Dubowitz and Y((LMP gestational age))=24.493+0.420*score for the Ballard method. Addition of birthweight to the regression models improved prediction of gestational age; Y((LMP gestational age))=23.512+0.219*score+0.0015*grams for Dubowitz and Y((LMP gestational age))=24.002+0.292*score+0.0016*grams for Ballard method. We recommend the use of our birthweight-adjusted maturity scales; the Dubowitz for studies of prematurity, and the Ballard for routine clinical practice.
    International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 08/2002; 78(1):7-18. DOI:10.1016/S0020-7292(02)00094-2 · 1.54 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The transverse cerebellar diameter was measured in 62 nondiabetic and 30 diabetic women with large for gestational age fetuses. Using reference curves from 675 women with normal gestations between 14-42 weeks, head circumference and abdominal circumference overestimated gestational age significantly in both study groups, whereas the transverse cerebellar diameter did not.
    Obstetrics and Gynecology 07/1990; 75(6):981-5. · 5.18 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: SummaryA clinical assessment of gestational age after birth has been compared with the ultrasound measurement in utero at various stages of pregnancy in a population of mixed socio-economic status and racial origin. In infants who were small-for-dates or large-for-dates at birth, accurate prediction from ultrasound measurement could only be achieved if the crown rump length or the biparietal diameter was measured before 20 weeks gestation. At this time, the infants destined to be small-for-dates or large-for-dates at birth show no growth retardation or acceleration. There is also no influence of racial origin on the measurements.
    BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 08/2005; 88(3):255 - 259. DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1981.tb00978.x · 3.45 Impact Factor


110 Reads
Available from