Article

Meta-analysis of efficacy of interventions for elevated depressive symptoms in adults diagnosed with cancer.

Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095-1563, USA.
CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment (Impact Factor: 15.16). 07/2012; 104(13):990-1004. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djs256
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Cancer patients are at increased risk for depression compared with individuals with no cancer diagnosis, yet few interventions target depressed cancer patients.
Efficacy of psychotherapeutic and pharmacologic interventions for depression in cancer patients who met an entry threshold for depressive symptoms was examined by meta-analysis. Five electronic databases were systematically reviewed to identify randomized controlled trials meeting the selection criteria. Effect sizes were calculated using Hedges' g and were pooled to compare pre- and postrandomization depressive symptoms with a random effects model. Subgroup analyses tested moderators of effect sizes, such as comparison of different intervention modalities, with a mixed effects model. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Ten randomized controlled trials (six psychotherapeutic and four pharmacologic studies) met the selection criteria; 1362 participants with mixed cancer types and stages had been randomly assigned to treatment groups. One outlier trial was removed from analyses. The random effects model showed interventions to be superior to control conditions on reducing depressive symptoms postintervention (Hedges' g = 0.43, 95% confidence interval = 0.30 to 0.56, P < .001). In the four psychotherapeutic trials with follow-up assessment, interventions were more effective than control conditions up to 12-18 months after patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups (P < .001). Although each approach was more effective than the control conditions in improving depressive symptoms (P < .001), subgroup analyses showed that cognitive behavioral therapy appeared more effective than problem-solving therapy (P = .01), but not more effective than pharmacologic intervention (P = .07).
Our findings suggest that psychological and pharmacologic approaches can be targeted productively toward cancer patients with elevated depressive symptoms. Research is needed to maximize effectiveness, accessibility, and integration into clinical care of interventions for depressed cancer patients.

1 Follower
 · 
158 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Over the last decade, there have been groundbreaking strides in our understanding of the multiple biological pathways by which psychosocial and behavioral factors can affect cancer progression. It is now clear that biobehavioral factors not only affect cellular immunity but both directly and indirectly modulate fundamental processes in cancer growth, including inflammation, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis. There is also an emerging understanding of how psychological and behavioral factors used in interventions can impact these physiological processes. This review outlines our current understanding of the physiological mechanisms by which psychological, social, and behavioral processes can affect cancer progression. The intervention literature is discussed, along with recommendations for future research to move the field of biobehavioral oncology forward. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
    American Psychologist 02/2015; 70(2):186-197. DOI:10.1037/a0035730 · 6.87 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tertiary prevention refers to care aimed at reducing morbidity and disability in people diagnosed with, and being treated for, disease. This article focuses on psychological aspects of tertiary prevention during the active phase of cancer treatment. Research in this area gained momentum in the 1970s, a time that coincides with changing public attitudes about discussing cancer and the origins of health psychology and behavioral medicine as fields of study. Over the past 40 years, much has been learned about the psychological impact of cancer and the beneficial effects of psychological interventions on patients' mental and physical well-being. The amount of research in this area necessitates a selective, rather than comprehensive, review approach. The focus here is on issues that affect a large proportion of people with cancer and for which research has generated an in-depth understanding. Accordingly, the article summarizes findings regarding the prevalence, etiology, and contributing factors, and the clinical management of, two of the most common psychological reactions to cancer diagnosis and treatment (i.e., depression and anxiety) and two of the most common physical symptoms related to cancer and its treatment (i.e., fatigue and pain). The review also summarizes emerging lines of research on psychological reactions to recurrent and second cancers, and on cancer diagnosis and treatment as a "teachable moment" for promoting health behavior change. Finally, important future directions are identified, including the need to adopt a team science approach to tertiary care and to better translate findings from intervention research into clinical practice. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
    American Psychologist 02/2015; 70(2):134-145. DOI:10.1037/a0036513 · 6.87 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Against the background of cancer as a contemporary public health challenge, this article presents a selective overview of psychological science contributions to cancer control research, practice, and policy. Initial contributions were circumscribed to awareness campaigns and the assessment of emotional responses to diagnosis and treatment. As evidence linking certain behaviors to cancer risk and outcomes accumulated, psychology emerged as a "hub science" in the Nation's cancer control program. Despite substantial accomplishments, new societal trends further challenge our ability to reduce risk, incidence, and deaths from cancer and enhance quality of life for cancer survivors. Evidence generated from psychological research conducted within each cell of Pasteur's quadrant continues to be relevant and necessary for effective 21st-century approaches to cancer prevention and control at the individual, clinical, and population levels. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
    American Psychologist 02/2015; 70(2):61-74. DOI:10.1037/a0038873 · 6.87 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
149 Downloads
Available from
May 23, 2014