A phase II trial to assess efficacy and safety of afatinib in extensively pretreated patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (Impact Factor: 4.47). 07/2012; 134(3):1149-59. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2126-1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Afatinib (BIBW 2992) is an ErbB-family blocker that irreversibly inhibits signaling from all relevant ErbB-family dimers. Afatinib has demonstrated preclinical activity in human epidermal growth factor receptor HER2 (ErbB2)-positive and triple-negative xenograft models of breast cancer, and clinical activity in phase I studies. This was a multicenter phase II study enrolling patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer progressing following no more than three lines of chemotherapy. No prior epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy was allowed. Patients received 50-mg afatinib once daily until disease progression. Tumor assessment was performed at every other 28-day treatment course. The primary endpoint was clinical benefit (CB) for ≥4 treatment courses in triple-negative (Cohort A) metastatic breast cancer (TNBC) and objective responses measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors in patients with HER2-negative, estrogen receptor-positive, and/or progesterone receptor-positive breast cancer (Cohort B). Fifty patients received treatment, including 29 patients in Cohort A and 21 patients in Cohort B. No objective responses were observed in either cohort. Median progression-free survival was 7.4 and 7.7 weeks in Cohorts A and B, respectively. Three patients with TNBC had stable disease for ≥4 treatment courses, one of them for 12 courses (median 26.3 weeks; range 18.9-47.9 weeks). The most frequently observed afatinib-associated adverse events (AEs) were gastrointestinal and skin-related side effects, which were manageable by symptomatic treatment and dose reductions. Afatinib pharmacokinetics were comparable to those observed in previously reported phase I trials. In conclusion, afatinib had limited activity in HER2-negative breast cancer. AEs were generally manageable and mainly affected the skin and the gastrointestinal tract.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This population pharmacokinetic model was developed to characterize the pharmacokinetics of the oral irreversible ErbB family blocker afatinib in patients with solid tumors and to investigate the impact of selected intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Data from 927 patients (4,460 plasma concentrations) with advanced solid tumors in 7 Phase II or III studies were analyzed. Afatinib was administered orally in continuous 3 or 4 week cycles (starting dose 20, 40 or 50 mg once-daily). Plasma concentration-time data for up to 7 months dosing were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. The pharmacokinetic profile of afatinib was best described by a two-compartment disposition model with first-order absorption and linear elimination. There was a slightly more than proportional increase in exposure with increasing dose, accounted for by a dose-dependent relative bioavailability. For the therapeutic dose of 40 mg, the estimated apparent total clearance and distribution volume at steady state were 734 mL/min and 2,370 L, respectively. While food intake, body weight, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score, renal function, and the level of alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase or total protein were statistically significant covariates influencing afatinib exposure, none resulted in a proportional change in exposure of more than 27.8 % in a typical patient at model extremes (2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of baseline values for continuous covariates). In simulations of the individual covariate effects, none caused a change in the typical profile exceeding the observed variability range (90 % prediction interval) of afatinib. This population pharmacokinetic model adequately described the pharmacokinetics of afatinib in different cancer patient populations and therefore can be used for simulations exploring covariate effects and possible dose adaptations. The effect size for each of the individual covariates is not considered clinically relevant.
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 02/2014; · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2 is overexpressed in 20 - 25% of breast cancers, and has historically been a poor prognostic marker. The introduction of trastuzumab, the first fully humanized monoclonal antibody targeting HER2, has drastically changed the outcomes of metastatic breast cancers. However, despite initial response, most patients develop resistance. Recent data suggest that strategies targeting more than one member of HER family may circumvent trastuzumab resistance and confer synergistic effects. Areas covered: Following a literature search on PubMed, national meetings and using 'afatinib', 'neratinib', 'HER2' and 'breast cancer' as keywords, we critically analyzed the different HER2-targeted therapies for their drug development and evidence-based therapeutic strategies. Afatinib and neratinib, two second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) that irreversibly inhibit more than one HER family member, are being actively investigated in clinical trials either as monotherapy or in combination. We reviewed the efficacy and optimal use of these agents in various settings, such as systemic therapy for advanced breast cancer including brain metastases, and neoadjuvant therapy in early-stage breast cancer. Expert opinion: HER2-targeted therapies have been widely used and greatly improved the outcome of HER2-positive breast cancer. Despite the accelerated advancement in recent years, several crucial questions remain unanswered, such as how to treat a prior resistance or affect a sanctuary site, that is, CNS metastasis. The novel next-generation TKIs, afatinib and neratinib, were rationally designed to overcome the resistance by targeting multiple HER family members and irreversibly binding the targets. In spite of the encouraging results of the afatinib and neratinib monotherapies, they have not been proven more efficacious in the combination therapies yet, even though multicenter international trials are still ongoing. The key tasks in the future are to study resistance pathways, design novel strategies to more efficiently test combinations for synergistic effects and identify biomarkers and novel imaging tools to guide individualized therapies.
    Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 04/2014; · 2.86 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: The EGFR has been associated with the pathogenesis and progression of breast cancer. Treatment based on an EGFR target is emerging as a promising option, especially in combination with conventional therapies. Unfortunately, there are no validated predictor biomarkers, and combinatorial treatments are meeting new resistance. Areas covered: The purpose of this review is to summarize the existing treatments and the current research based on targeting the EGFR pathway. Expert opinion: The existing EGFR treatments in breast cancer have shown limited benefit. The combination of the monoclonal antibody cetuximab and platinum salts achieves a 15 - 20% response rate. The effectiveness of tyrosine kinase inhibitors is not completely clear, showing modest or no benefits. Gefitinib treatment has offered some promising results in estrogen receptor + breast cancer. However, it has not been identified as a predictive factor for the appropriate selection of patients. Radioimmunotherapy with anti-EGFR radiolabeled antibodies is a promising strategy in BRCA-mutated breast cancer, but it still requires clinical confirmation. Nevertheless, the crosstalk between pathways frequently leads to treatment resistance. Current research is focused on increasing knowledge about the mechanisms of response and the discovery of predictive markers. Targeting several pathways simultaneously and a correct selection of patients seem essential.
    Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs 05/2014; · 2.48 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 27, 2014