Article

Elements of Blending – (In Arabic) مدخل في نظريّة المزج

SSRN Electronic Journal 12/2011; DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1729948

ABSTRACT The book presents lectures delivered by Mark Turner at the University of Manouba, Tunisia, during November, 2010, translated into Arabic by Professor Lazhar Zanned. Introduction: Origins and Purposes of Blending Theory. Part One: Introduction to Blending. Part Two: Blending and Language.

0 Followers
 · 
168 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Planning for a future, rather than a current, mental state is a cognitive process generally viewed as uniquely human. Here, however, I shall report on a decade of observations of spontaneous planning by a male chimpanzee in a zoo. The planning actions, which took place in a calm state, included stone caching and the manufacture of discs from concrete, objects later used as missiles against zoo visitors during agitated chimpanzee dominance displays. Such planning implies advanced consciousness and cognition traditionally not associated with nonhuman animals [1]. Spontaneous and unambiguous planning behaviours for future states by non-humans have not previously been reported, and anecdotal reports, describing single occasions, are exceptionally scarce 2, 3 and 4. This dearth of observations is arguably the main reason for not ascribing cognitive foresight to nonhuman animals [1]. To date, the surprisingly few controlled demonstrations of planning for future states by animals are experimentally induced behaviours in great apes 5, 6 and 7 and corvids 8 and 9. The observational findings in this report suggest that these laboratory results are not experimental artefacts, at least in the case of great apes.
    Current biology: CB 04/2009; 19(5):R190-1. DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.010 · 9.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: New data suggest that relatively drastic revisions are needed in our theoretical accounts of what other animal species understand about the psychological states of others. Specifically, chimpanzees seem to understand some things about what others do and do not see, or have and have not seen in the immediate past, as well as some things about others' goal-directed activities. This is especially so in competitive situations. They clearly do not have a human-like theory of mind, however, and so the challenge is to specify precisely how ape and human social cognition are similar and different.
    Trends in Cognitive Sciences 05/2003; 7(4):153-156. DOI:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00035-4 · 21.15 Impact Factor