Strategy Process Management in Multinational Companies: Status Quo, Deficits and Future Perspectives

Problems and Perspectives in Management 01/2009; 7(1):70-85.

ABSTRACT This article analyzes the underinvestigated field of strategy process management in German multinational companies (MNCs). Whereas the emphasis of research in the field of strategic management has traditionally been laid on the investigation of the strategy content, the knowledge of the strategy process and how promising strategies can be shaped and implemented within firms still remains limited. Considering these aspects this paper provides the following: first, we draw a distinction between different stages of the strategy process and empirically investigate tools and concepts applied by 122 firms to describe the status quo of strategic management in German MNCs. Second, based on our findings, we highlight the major deficits in the current strategy processes of the surveyed firms. Third, we present some suggestions on how strategy processes should be designed in MNCs in order to have a positive impact on performance. Although our study focuses solely on German MNCs we consider the results to be helpful for firms from other national backgrounds.

1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article examines methods for estimating nonresponse bias. Predictions of the direction of nonresponse bias are evaluated, and estimates are made of the magnitude of this bias. An attempt was made to include all relevant previously published studies. Methods For Estimating Nonresponse Bias
    Journal of Marketing Research 08/1977; 14:396-402. DOI:10.2307/3150783 · 2.52 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We propose that competitive success and failure evolve through an ecology of organizational learning. An organization facing competition is likely to engage in a search for ways to improve performance. When successful, this search results in learning that is likely to increase the organization's competitive strength, which in turn triggers learning in its rivals—consequently making them stronger competitors and so again triggering learning in the first organization. We elaborate the conditions under which this self-reinforcing process, known in evolutionary theory as the ‘Red Queen,’ is likely to be adaptive or maladaptive. Adaptive consequences are predicted only for recently experienced learning. Experience in the more distant past of an organization's life, by contrast, is predicted to backfire into a ‘competency trap.’ We predict maladaptive consequences when organizations face many, varied cohorts of rivals. We empirically distinguish these effects using ecological models of competition. Estimates of organizational failure rales reveal a Red Queen among Illinois banks, and support our predictions.
    Strategic Management Journal 06/2007; 17(S1):139 - 157. DOI:10.1002/smj.4250171010 · 3.78 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Resource-oriented perspectives of strategic management are on the way to discovering a topic to which little attention has been paid so far within their own ranks: inter-firm networks. In this article, it is argued that the resource- and competence-based view ? despite its new facet of analysis ? falls back on a traditional firm-focused explanation. Conversely, the relational view, the youngest branch of strategic management, follows completely new explanatory paths. Here, an inter-firm focus is established. Overall, there are two related, but diametrically opposed strategic management approaches, each assigning a different kind of importance to the meaning of competition in the context of analysing cooperative inter-firm relations.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 2, 2014