The Asset Growth Effect: Insights from International Equity Markets

Journal of Financial Economics (Impact Factor: 3.72). 07/2012; 108(2). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1787237


Firms with higher asset growth rates subsequently experience lower stock returns in international equity markets, consistent with the U.S. evidence. This negative effect of asset growth on returns is stronger in more developed capital markets and markets where stocks are more efficiently priced, but is unrelated to country characteristics representing limits to arbitrage, investor protection, and accounting quality. The evidence suggests that the cross-sectional relation between asset growth and stock return is more likely due to an optimal investment effect than due to over-investment, market timing, or other forms of mispricing.

23 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We investigate the performance of the alternative three-factor model across markets. The important U.S. evidence of Chen, Novy-Marx, and Zhang (2010) in favor of the alternative model does not translate to a test setting using data from 40 non-U.S. stock markets. The three-factor model of Fama and French provides persistently a better description of average returns. Our analysis is robust across developed and emerging markets, robust to alternative measures of investment and profitability, to seasonality effects, to size-segmented subsamples and subperiods, to various test assets, and to the two-stage cross-section regression approach to test for priced factors.
    European Financial Management 10/2011; 20(1). DOI:10.1111/j.1468-036X.2011.00628.x · 1.03 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Motivated from Fama’s (1991) conjecture of an explicit link between the cross-sectional and time-series stock return predictability, we investigate whether the investment factor constructed from the cross-section of stocks also has time-series predictive power for stock returns within Merton’s (1973) ICAPM framework. The evidence from both U.S. and other G-7 countries (except Japan) suggests that the investment factor is a proxy for time-varying investment opportunities. We also find that the risk-return relation is positive and statistically significant after controlling for the covariance between the market factor and the investment factor.
    Journal of Banking & Finance 07/2014; 44(1). DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.04.016 · 1.29 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several studies document a robust negative association between net external financing and average stock returns, which is referred to as the external financing effect. Using total asset growth as a comprehensive measure of overall corporate investment and total profitability gross of R&D expenditures as a measure of true economic profitability, we provide new evidence in support of the q-theory explanation for the external financing effect. We also test the market timing explanation for the external financing effect but fail to document supportive evidence.
    Journal of Banking & Finance 08/2014; 49:69–81. DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.08.010 · 1.29 Impact Factor
Show more


23 Reads
Available from