Article

The Indian Bt Brinjal Controversy: Genetically Modified Food, Legal & Regulatory Framework

09/2010; DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1682914

ABSTRACT Bacillus thuringiensis Brinjal, popularly known as Bt brinjal, was at the centre of a major controversy in India recently. Bt brinjal, a genetically modified strain created by India's number one seeds company Mahyco in collaboration with American multinational Monsanto, claims to improve yields and help the agriculture sector. However, the debate over the safety of Bt brinjal continues with mixed views from scientists working for the government, farmers and environment activists. It is also said that Bt Brinjal will harm the environment along with other unforeseen effects including safety of the consumers. The paper focuses on a complete overview of Bt Brinjal and the environmental effects of genetically modified crops in light of the Bt Brinjal controversy. There is evidence that GM crops pose legal and economic risks. It could, for example, result in many, many farmers growing the same crop, which could result in vast amounts of food being lost to one overlooked disease or natural disaster. Also, huge bioengineering companies like Monsanto are suing small farmers because they were supposedly using GM corn that was resistant to the herbicide Roundup without a license from Monsanto. The result is a huge legal mess. Clearly GM crops have a lot of problems and kinks that need to be sorted out. Countries may promote GM crops or ban them. There are reasons justifying each action. This paper focuses on the GM food legal and regulatory framework and the developments on the issue in India.

2 Bookmarks
 · 
289 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Discussions of the environmental risks and benefits of adopting genetically engineered organisms are highly polarized between pro- and anti-biotechnology groups, but the current state of our knowledge is frequently overlooked in this debate. A review of existing scientific literature reveals that key experiments on both the environmental risks and benefits are lacking. The complexity of ecological systems presents considerable challenges for experiments to assess the risks and benefits and inevitable uncertainties of genetically engineered plants. Collectively, existing studies emphasize that these can vary spatially, temporally, and according to the trait and cultivar modified.
    Science 01/2001; 290(5499):2088-93. · 31.03 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Precautionary principles have been proposed as a fundamental element of sound risk management. Their advocates see them as guiding action in the face of uncertainty, encouraging the adoption of measures that reduce serious risks to health, safety, and the environment. Their opponents may reject the very idea of precautionary principles, find specific principles unacceptably vague or see them as clearly doing economic damage-either to society as a whole or to their own interests. This article traces the development of alternative precautionary principles, primarily in Europe. Their adequacy is considered in one context where such principles have often been invoked, using genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture. Although some precautionary principles can be given analytical rigor, the concerns that they express strain the intellectual and institutional structure of conventional policy analysis. © 2002 by the Association for Policy Analysis and Management.
    Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 01/2002; 21(3):381-407. · 0.93 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Genetically modified crops have been an object of debate since their introduction in India. This paper therefore gives an overall picture of India’s legal stand on genetically modified crops, how they are regulated and what is the government’s role in the process. It also presents the global position of India followed by listing of public and private institutes involved in R & D. It also apprises us of the major points of contention regarding GM crops.
    09/2009;

Full-text

View
12 Downloads
Available from