Article

An Empirical Analysis of Fund Regulation and Scope of Distribution of European Investment Funds

SSRN Electronic Journal 10/2009; DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1494304

ABSTRACT This paper examines the impact of the 2001 UCITS III Directive on international distributions of European investment funds from 2002-2008. We analyze several dimensions of the notification decision: (1) whether the fund is distributed cross-border; (2) the number of countries where funds are notified for distribution; and (3) the population size implied by the notification list. Although UCITS III facilitated international distributions, it did so with costs that disadvantaged smaller funds, and did not have effective procedures to facilitate fund mergers. Consistent with these regulatory impediments, our comprehensive dataset on European investment funds shows that larger fund promoters and funds domiciled in smaller countries have much wider distributions, but merged funds have a narrower scope of international notifications. Also, we document that the international scope of notifications is concave in that fewer new countries are notified over time. As well, we empirically show an increase in the number of fund promoters that distribute UCITS funds outside the European Union, notably in Asia, which can be attributable to the superior investor protection of UCITS regulation. We find that notifications in Asian countries are mostly done by non-European promoters (primarily US promoters).

0 Bookmarks
 · 
70 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper introduces a new dataset from 100 Dutch institutional investors’ domestic and international asset private equity allocations. The data indicate that the perceived comparative dearth of regulations of private equity funds impedes institutional investor participation in private equity funds, particularly in relation to the lack of transparency. The data further indicate that the perceived importance of regulatory harmonization of institutional investors has increased Dutch institutional investor allocations to domestic and international private equity funds. The Financieel Toetsingskader (regulation of portfolio management standards such as matching of assets and liabilities) has had the most pronounced and robust effect, followed by Basel II (regulation of risk management and disclosure standards) and the International Financial Reporting Standards (regulation of reporting standards and transparency).
    Journal of Banking & Finance. 10/2007;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The fast growing EU market for investment funds is still characterised by a continuing relevance of national borders. This papers assesses this market?s degree of integration, the potential benefits from more integration and the obstacles to cross-border sales of funds. The analysis shows that markets of small member countries are particularly isolated since for suppliers of funds the market potential is too small to compensate for the fixed costs of market entry. But also in the big markets foreign funds lack market success. A better integrated European market for investment funds would provide three kinds of benefits: It increases choice of products, it allows to realise economies of scale and it intensifies competition for the benefit of private investors. It is argued that the present characteristics of fund distribution channels are mainly responsible for fragmentation besides regulatory and tax issues. --
    ZEW - Zentrum f�r Europ�ische Wirtschaftsforschung / Center for European Economic Research, ZEW Discussion Papers. 01/2002;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper studies the mutual fund industry in 56 countries and examines where this financial innovation has flourished. The fund industry is larger in countries with stronger rules, laws, and regulations, and specifically where mutual fund investors’ rights are better protected. The industry is also larger in countries with wealthier and more educated populations, where the industry is older, trading costs are lower and in which defined contribution pension plans are more prevalent. The industry is smaller in countries where barriers to entry are higher. These results indicate that laws and regulations, supply-side and demand-side factors simultaneously affect the size of the fund industry.
    SSRN Electronic Journal 01/2004;

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
55 Downloads
Available from
Jun 5, 2014