Article

Do Technology and Efficiency Differences Determine Productivity?

07/2007; DOI:10.2139/ssrn.998107
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT This paper investigates the forces driving output growth, namely technological, efficiency, and input changes, in 80 countries over the period 1970-2000. Relevant past studies typically assume that: (i) countries use resources efficiently, and (ii) the underlying production technology is the same for all countries. We address these issues by estimating a stochastic frontier model, which explicitly accounts for inefficiency, augmented with a latent class structure, which allows for production technologies to differ across groups of countries. Membership of these groups is estimated, rather than determined ex ante. Our results indicate the existence of three groups of countries. These groups differ significantly in terms of efficiency levels, technological change, and the development of capital and labor elasticities. However, a consistent finding across groups is that growth is driven mainly by factor accumulation (capital deepening).

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
67 Views
  • Source
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The main objective of this study is to investigate the impact of corporate R&D activities on firms' performance, measured by labour productivity. To this end, the stochastic frontier technique is applied, basing the analysis on a unique unbalanced longitudinal dataset consisting of 532 top European R&D investors over the period 2000–2005. R&D stocks are considered as pivotal input in order to control for their particular contribution to firm-level efficiency. Conceptually, the study quantifies the technical inefficiency of a given company and tests empirically whether R&D activities could explain the distance from the efficient boundary of the production possibility set, i.e. the production frontier. From a policy perspective, the results of this study suggest that – if the aim is to leverage companies' productivity – emphasis should be put on supporting corporate R&D in high-tech sectors and, to some extent, in medium-tech sectors. By contrast, supporting corporate R&D in the low-tech sector turns out to have a minor effect. Instead, encouraging investment in fixed assets appears vital for the productivity of low-tech industries. However, with regard to firms' technical efficiency, R&D matters for all industries (unlike capital intensity). Hence, the allocation of support for corporate R&D seems to be as important as its overall increase and an 'erga omnes' approach across all sectors appears inappropriate.
    Journal of Productivity Analysis 12/2009; 37(2):125-140. · 0.87 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) models have gained continuously in popularity as an empirical tool for assessing the impact of trade liberalization on growth, poverty and equity. In recent years, there have been attempts to extend the scope of CGE trade models to the analysis of the interaction of agricultural growth, poverty and income distribution. Conventional models ignore however the channels linking technical change in agriculture, trade openness and poverty. This study seeks to incorporate econometric evidence of these linkages into a dynamic sequential CGE model, to estimate the impact of alternative trade liberalization scenarios on welfare, poverty and equity. The analysis uses the latent class stochastic frontier model in investigating the influence of international trade on agricultural technological change and productivity. The estimated productivity gains induced from a more opened trade regime are combined with a general equilibrium analysis of trade liberalization to evaluate the direct welfare benefits of poor farmers and the indirect income and prices outcomes. These effects are then used to infer the impact on poverty using the traditional top-down approach and the Tunisian household

Full-text (3 Sources)

View
23 Downloads
Available from
Jan 4, 2013