Managing Value in Supply Chain – Case Studies on the Sourcing Hub Concept

California management review (Impact Factor: 1.67). 02/2014; 56(2). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1888756

ABSTRACT In this paper, we postulate that a firm's sourcing knowledge can be a strategic resource for the firm, and explore how firms can capture and build on their sourcing knowledge. We examine the sourcing experiences of four firms in four different countries in the automotive industry, who are in the process of improving their supply-chain partnerships. We study upstream sourcing of these firms: their suppliers and their suppliers' suppliers, and focus on identifying the sourcing knowledge and sourcing cost related parameters with appropriate theoretical explanations. Synthesizing the learnings from these case studies, we propose the concept of the Sourcing Hub, a collaborative center involving the firm, its suppliers and raw material suppliers, as the principal alignment mechanism for managing value in upstream sourcing. Our research shows that deploying a sourcing hub can help firms create value by better management of upstream sourcing related knowledge and costs.

1 Follower
  • Quarterly Journal of Economics 02/1981; 96(2):243-70. DOI:10.2307/1882390 · 5.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Though there is a wide acceptance of the strategic importance of integrating operations with suppliers and customers in supply chains, many questions remain unanswered about how best to characterize supply chain strategies. Is it more important to link with suppliers, customers, or both? Similarly, we know little about the connections between supplier and customer integration and improved operations performance. This paper investigated supplier and customer integration strategies in a global sample of 322 manufacturers. Scales were developed for measuring supply chain integration and five different strategies were identified in the sample. Each of these strategies is characterized by a different “arc of integration”, representing the direction (towards suppliers and/or customers) and degree of integration activity. There was consistent evidence that the widest degree of arc of integration with both suppliers and customers had the strongest association with performance improvement. The implications for our findings on future research and practice in the new millennium are considered.
    Journal of Operations Management 02/2001; DOI:10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00055-3 · 4.48 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is often claimed that the distinctive feature of Japanese industrial organization is the presence of horizontal and vertical firm groupings (business groups and >i>keiretsu>/i>) and the prevalence of the "subcontractor relationship" between a firm and its suppliers. The following will examine the "subcontractor" typology, but as these three forms of organization tend partially to overlap in the real world, the study should also help to deepen our understanding of corporate groups.
    Japanese Economy 07/1985; 13(4):32-53. DOI:10.2753/JES1097-203X130432


Available from
Jun 1, 2014