Impacts and Consequences of the New Regime of Autonomies in Bolivia: Elements for a Discussion

SSRN Electronic Journal 07/2011; DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1892011


Bolivia’s 1994 Popular Participation reforms devolved political powers and resources to hundreds of municipal governments throughout the land. The country is currently implementing a further round of reforms that would grant a degree of autonomy to departmental, regional, municipal, and indigenous and rural governments. What effects might this have on public investment patterns, government responsiveness, government fiscal relations, the sustainability of public finances, and political accountability? Acknowledging from the outset that it is too soon to analyze the effects of this reform, I instead examine its main provisions in light of the insights provided by the international fiscal federalism literature, and extensive evidence on the effects of Bolivia’s 1994 reforms. By submitting the law to the dual rigors of theory and evidence, we can try to arrive at contingent predictions of its likely effects which, if not precise, are at least reasonable baselines. These in turn allow us to make recommendations for amendments and adjustments, not so much to the legal text as to the more complicated question of the implementation of reform. The deeper aim of this paper is to enrich the current debate on how decentralization can be implemented in ways that strengthen democracy and give voice to the poor.

Download full-text


Available from: Jean-Paul Faguet, Oct 07, 2015
1 Follower
296 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Poverty reduction efforts in Malawi are currently based on the twin strategies of the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) and decentralization of government. This paper seeks to provide a critical viewpoint on these macro-level processes based in micro-level investigations of rural livelihoods. The truly desperate livelihood circumstances of most rural Malawians are emphasized by qualitative and quantitative information on assets, activities and outcomes in eight villages in Dedza and Zomba districts. Poor rural Malawians confront multiple severe constraints that can only be addressed by some combination of raising agricultural productivity, diversifying farm output to reduce risk and shift toward higher value outputs, and diversifying livelihoods toward nonfarm enterprises. The paper pays particular attention to the public sector institutional environment required to facilitate and encourage the latter option, and finds that the PRSP offers little guidance in this regard. Given already existing tendencies for monetized farm and nonfarm activities to be seen more as sources of potential revenue than as engines of growth and poverty reduction, there is a real threat that fiscal decentralization to 27 new rural district assemblies will create new barriers to trade and enterprise by multiplying business licenses and commodity taxes. A hitherto little explored but potentially important contradiction between the objectives of the PRSP and the funding needs of local government is brought to the surface.
    World Development 08/2003; 31(9):1495-1510. DOI:10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00111-6 · 1.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The paper analyzes the process of capacity development in a sample of Colombian local governments which resulted from a strategy of state decentralization initiated in the mid-1980s. The central message of the study is that competition for political office opened the door to responsible and innovative leadership that, in turn, became the driving force behind capacity building efforts. More widespread community participation expanded the range of possibilities open to local governments and provided the basis to sustain capacity over time. The experience of these municipios suggests that capacity can be enhanced through skillful innovations even under difficult circumstances.
    World Development 07/1997; 25(7-25):1029-1043. DOI:10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00020-X · 1.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Like other sub-Saharan African countries, Tanzania is caught up in a process by which previous structural adjustment conditionalities have been replaced by the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP). This paper utilizes research on rural livelihoods in 10 subvillages in the country’s Morogoro region to derive policy inferences relevant to the capacity of the PRSP to deliver its promises for poverty reduction in rural areas. Research findings show that rural poverty is strongly associated with lack of land and livestock, as well as inability to secure nonfarm alternatives to diminishing farm opportunities. The rural poor encounter a public sector institutional context that is neutral or blocking rather than enabling for them to construct their own pathways out of poverty. The PRSP process needs to address disjunctures between its macro-level goals and debilitating local-level institutional contexts, if real gains in rural poverty reduction are to be realized.
    World Development 08/2003; 31(8-31):1367-1384. DOI:10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00100-1 · 1.73 Impact Factor
Show more