Are Patients Whose Study Partners Are Spouses More Likely to be Eligible for Alzheimer's Disease Clinical Trials?

Mary Easton Center for Alzheimer's Disease Research, Department of Neurology, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders (Impact Factor: 3.55). 07/2012; 33(5):334-40. DOI: 10.1159/000339361
Source: PubMed


Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials enroll two participants: a patient and a study partner. The primary caregiver most often fills the role of study partner and most trial study partners are spousal caregivers.
AD trial inclusion criteria were applied to baseline data from 5,674 probable AD dementia research participants in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set. Eligibility was compared among patients with spousal, adult child, and other types of study partners.
Patients with spousal study partners were more frequently eligible than patients with adult child study partners. Compared to patients with spousal study partners, patients with adult child study partners were more frequently ineligible because of age, residence in skilled nursing facility, low scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination, highscores on the Hachinski Ischemia Scale, and failure to fulfill a minimum number of weekly visits with the study partner.
In this sample, patients with adult child study partners were less likely to qualify for AD clinical trials than were patients with spousal study partners. This may contribute to the lower representation of patients with adult child caregivers in these studies.

12 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Alzheimer disease (AD) dementia clinical trials require 2 participants: a patient and a study partner. We assessed the prevalence of study partner types and how these types associate with patient-related outcome measures. Methods: Retrospective analyses of 6 Alzheimer's disease cooperative study (ADCS) randomized clinical trials were conducted. Study partners were categorized as spouse, adult child, or other. Prevalence of study partner type and associations between study partner type and trial outcomes including study completion and placebo decline on the mini-mental state examination, the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale, the clinical dementia rating scale sum of the boxes score, and the ADCS-activities of daily living were examined. Results: More participants (67%) enrolled with spouses than adult children (26%) or other study partners (7%). Participants with spouse partners had a lower dropout rate (25%) than those with adult child (32%) or other study partners (34%); only the difference vs. others was statistically significant. Participants with adult child and other partners randomized to placebo performed worse at baseline than those with spouse partners on the ADCS-activities of daily living (p = 0.04), but were not different at 18 months. There were no differences at baseline for the mini-mental state examination, clinical dementia rating scale sum of the boxes score, or Alzheimer's disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale. In multivariate models of the rates of change over time among placebo participants, no differences among study partner groups reached statistical significance. Conclusions: Patients with nonspouse caregivers less frequently participate in AD dementia trials. Increased enrollment of AD patients with nonspouse caregivers may require additional recruitment and retention strategies.
    Neurology 12/2012; 80(3). DOI:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827debfe · 8.29 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Alzheimer disease (AD) research faces challenges to successful enrollment, especially to clinical trials and biomarker studies. Failure to recruit the planned number of participants in a timely manner threatens the internal validity and success of clinical research, raising concerns about external validity and generalizability of results, and possibly leading to disparities in disease treatment. Methods to improve recruitment exist, but require varying levels of staff effort and financial resources, and evidence of effectiveness is often lacking or inconsistent. In this review, we summarize some of the available methods to improve AD research recruitment, the available literature to support or refute these strategies, and some of the experiences at the authors' AD Research Centers. We discuss the use of community-based participatory research principles and participant registries as a means to enhance research enrollment and increase diversity of research samples.
    Alzheimer disease and associated disorders 12/2013; 28(1). DOI:10.1097/WAD.0000000000000016 · 2.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective We investigated the proportion of people with dementia who are eligible for and willing to participate in intervention studies.Methods We systematically reviewed 12 studies fitting predetermined criteria, reporting eligibility or participation rates for dementia intervention trials or intervention studies that sought to increase recruitment. We assessed the study validity using a checklist, reported trial eligibility and participation rates and meta-analysed these where appropriate.ResultsIn higher quality studies, 26% [95% confidence interval 19–35%] of people with Alzheimer's disease (AD) attending memory clinics or receiving antidementia medication were eligible for industry drug trials, and 43% of eligible people agreed to participate in one study, suggesting 11% of these populations would take part in drug trials if approached. There was replicated, higher quality evidence that younger people, men and those with more education were more likely to be eligible for AD drug trials. No randomised controlled trials have investigated how to increase recruitment to dementia intervention studies.Conclusion One in 10 people with AD or taking donepezil would, according to best available evidence, take part in industry drug trials if approached. We found no data regarding non-pharmacological intervention or pragmatic drug trial recruitment, but eligibility and participation rates for these studies are probably higher. If international studies are extrapolated to the UK, they suggest the national target of recruiting 10% of people with dementia diagnoses to research may be achieved through a nationwide policy of asking all people with dementia and their carers for consent to be approached for research participation. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 05/2014; 29(5). DOI:10.1002/gps.4034 · 2.87 Impact Factor
Show more