Article

Extended biopsy based criteria incorporating cumulative cancer length for predicting clinically insignificant prostate cancer

Departments of Urology Pathology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate SchoolDepartments of Urology Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
BJU International (Impact Factor: 3.13). 07/2012; 110(11B). DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11272.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To develop extended biopsy based criteria for predicting insignificant cancer (IC) using extended biopsy findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 2000 to 2009, 1575 patients with prostate cancer were primarily treated by radical prostatectomy in two referral hospitals. Of these, the study cohort comprised 499 patients with extended biopsy confirmed, clinically organ-confined (cT1-2N0M0) prostate cancer with PSA levels of <20 ng/mL. Cancer information obtained through extended biopsy included cumulative cancer length (CCL) divided by the number of biopsy cores (CCL/core). RESULTS Pathological examination revealed 39 ICs (7.8%). All these ICs fell in a category of prostate cancer with clinical stage <= T2a and 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference (ISUP) modified biopsy Gleason score <= 7. Accordingly, we analysed predictors of IC in a subset cohort of 370 patients in this category. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that 2005 ISUP modified biopsy Gleason score and CCL/core were independently significant predictors of IC. We determined a threshold value of CCL/core of 0.20 mm for predicting IC using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Based on these findings, we developed simple extended biopsy based criteria for predicting IC as follows: (i) PSA level of <20 ng/mL; (ii) Clinical stage <= T2a; (iii) 2005 ISUP modified biopsy Gleason score <= 6; (iv) CCL/core of <0.20 mm. The specificity of the criteria was 91%, which was significantly higher than the value from a subset of criteria without item iv (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION We have developed extended biopsy based criteria for predicting IC incorporating the 2005 ISUP modified biopsy Gleason score and CCL/core.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Iwao Fukui, Sep 18, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
98 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To find out which factors could predict the diagnosis of insignificant prostate cancer (ins-PCa) according to a recently updated definition (overall tumor volume up to 2.5 cm(3); final Gleason score ≤6; organ-confined disease) on a prostatic biopsy specimen. This was a retrospective analysis of 210 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for a cT1c prostate neoplasm with a biopsy specimen Gleason score of ≤6. A logistic regression model was used to assess the differences in the distribution of some possibly predictive factors between the ins-PCa patients, according to the updated definition, and the remaining patients. By applying an updated definition of ins-PCa, the prevalence of this condition increased from 13.3% to 49.5% (104 of 210 patients). The univariate analysis showed a statistically different distribution of the following factors: prostate-specific antigen density, prostate volume, number of cancer-involved cores, and maximum percentage of core involvement by cancer. At the multivariable analysis, the maximum percentage of involvement of the core retained its relevance (27.0% in ins-PCa patients and 43.8% in the remaining patients; hazard ratio, 0.972; P = .046), and a 20% cutoff was detected. In a cohort of patients with PCa cT1c and a biopsy specimen Gleason score of ≤6, the ins-PCa rate, according to the updated definition, is close to 50%, and the percentage of cancer involvement of the core is the single factor that best predicts this diagnosis.
    Urology 10/2013; 83(1). DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.056 · 2.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To identify predictive factors of unfavorable disease and of biochemical failure in patients treated with radical prostatectomy but eligible for active surveillance (AS) according to Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance (PRIAS) criteria. We aimed to introduce and validate the percentage of cancer involvement in positive cores (CIPC) as potential worse predictive factor. From January 2002 to December 2007, 750 consecutive subjects underwent radical prostatectomy at a single institution. We identified 147 (19.05%) patients who were eligible for AS based on PRIAS criteria: clinical stage T1c or T2 disease, prostate-specific antigen level of≤10ng/ml, Gleason score≤6, prostate-specific antigen-D of<0.2ng/ml(2), and fewer than 3 positive biopsy cores. CIPC was included in the analysis. Of the 147 patients, 95 (66.43%) patients had favorable disease, whereas 48 (33.57%) had unfavorable disease. In multivariate logistic regression, maximum cancer length (odds ratio 12.52, P<0.01) and CIPC (odds ratio 1.70, P<0.01) represented independent predictors of unfavorable prostate cancer. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis revealed significantly higher performance after including CIPC to the PRIAS criteria (0.61 vs. 0.94, P<0.01). A cutoff of 0.4mm of CIPC was set to predict unfavorable disease with 93% specificity, 76% sensibility, and 87% accuracy based on the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. Finally, the 3- and 5-years biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival were significantly lower in subjects with CIPC≥0.4mm, 88.4 % and 81.0% vs. 97.8% and 95.7%, respectively (P< 0.01). Our findings suggest that the inclusion of CIPC to the prostate biopsy features could be helpful to avoid misclassification in patients eligible for AS according to the PRIAS criteria.
    Urologic Oncology 10/2013; 191(4). DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.07.004 · 3.36 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assess whether the addition of clinical Gleason score (Gs) 3+4 to the Prostate Cancer Research International: Active Surveillance (PRIAS) criteria affects pathologic results in patients who are potentially suitable for active surveillance (AS) and to identify possible clinical predictors of unfavourable outcome. Three hundred and twenty-nine men who underwent radical prostatectomy with complete clinical and follow-up data and who would have fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the PRIAS protocol at the time of biopsy except for the addition of biopsy Gs=3+4 and with at least 10 cores taken have been evaluated. One experienced genitourinary pathologist selected those with real Gs=3+3 and 3+4 in only one core according to the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology criteria. The primary end point was the proportion of unfavourable outcome (nonorgan confined disease or Gs⩾4+3). Logistic regressions explored the association between preoperative characteristics and the primary end point. Two hundred and four patients were evaluated and 46 (22.5%) patients harboured unfavourable disease at final pathology. After a median follow-up of 73.5 months, there was no cancer-specific death, and 4 (2.0%) patients had biochemical relapse. There were no significant differences in terms of high Gs, locally advanced disease, unfavourable disease and biochemical relapse-free survival among patients with clinical Gs=3+3 vs Gs=3+4. At multivariable analysis, the presence of atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) and lower number of core taken were independently associated with a higher risk of unfavourable disease. The inclusion of Gs=3+4 in patients suitable to AS does not enhance the risk of unfavourable disease after radical prostatectomy. Additional factors such as number of cores taken and the presence of ASAP should be considered in patients suitable for AS.Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Disease advance online publication, 9 June 2015; doi:10.1038/pcan.2015.21.
    Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases 06/2015; DOI:10.1038/pcan.2015.21 · 2.83 Impact Factor